Snap General Election called

Post Reply
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stones of granite »

Son of Mathonwy wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
Son of Mathonwy wrote: It doesn't matter if it's officially down to Rees-Mogg. Johnson wants this, so it's happening. If he didn't want it, it wouldn't be happening. De facto, it is down to Johnson.
We're back to the discussion on accountability vs responsibility. How far has Boris looked into this in detail or just told JRM to make it happen? I doubt seriously that this is Boris' plan, nothing about him suggests he has that much grasp of the detail and at the moment he has plenty of other things to consider. The general concept is probably Boris', but the clownish detail is JRMs for sure.

He could have achieved the same with a number of MPs in the house and the rest online with equal voting for all via technology. It could have been the start of a revolution in how the Commons operates with electronic voting instead of this ludicrous filing out to be counted in various lobbies. Instead we get this.
Agreed, the general concept, the ultimate responsibility is Boris's, the detail is presumably delegated to Rees-Mogg.
They should do it the other way round - just for the comedy value.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

I've no idea why when we're discussing this they even need to file into lobbies to assent or disagree with a proposal, even the system working as it's meant to seems anachronistic at best. I can see why Mogg is a fan of pretending we're not even into the 20th century yet, but for the rest of them it's just weird and surely they should have better uses of their time!
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stones of granite »

Digby wrote:I've no idea why when we're discussing this they even need to file into lobbies to assent or disagree with a proposal, even the system working as it's meant to seems anachronistic at best. I can see why Mogg is a fan of pretending we're not even into the 20th century yet, but for the rest of them it's just weird and surely they should have better uses of their time!
There's a rumour of a disagreement between Rees Mogg and Johnson. Apparently Rees Mogg thinks that formal parliamentary business should be undertaken in Latin, but Johnson disagrees and is insistent on Ancient Greek.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14580
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mellsblue »

Stones of granite wrote:
Digby wrote:I've no idea why when we're discussing this they even need to file into lobbies to assent or disagree with a proposal, even the system working as it's meant to seems anachronistic at best. I can see why Mogg is a fan of pretending we're not even into the 20th century yet, but for the rest of them it's just weird and surely they should have better uses of their time!
There's a rumour of a disagreement between Rees Mogg and Johnson. Apparently Rees Mogg thinks that formal parliamentary business should be undertaken in Latin, but Johnson disagrees and is insistent on Ancient Greek.
And there I was assuming it was the old double-breasted suit or single breasted suit debate rearing its ugly head again.
Let’s not get started on the six kids with one woman or three.
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stones of granite »

Mellsblue wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
Digby wrote:I've no idea why when we're discussing this they even need to file into lobbies to assent or disagree with a proposal, even the system working as it's meant to seems anachronistic at best. I can see why Mogg is a fan of pretending we're not even into the 20th century yet, but for the rest of them it's just weird and surely they should have better uses of their time!
There's a rumour of a disagreement between Rees Mogg and Johnson. Apparently Rees Mogg thinks that formal parliamentary business should be undertaken in Latin, but Johnson disagrees and is insistent on Ancient Greek.
And there I was assuming it was the old double-breasted suit or single breasted suit debate rearing its ugly head again.
Let’s not get started on the six kids with one woman or three.
Johnson always looks like he's grabbed someone else's jacket in the rush to get out of someone else's bedroom.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

Stones of granite wrote:
Digby wrote:I've no idea why when we're discussing this they even need to file into lobbies to assent or disagree with a proposal, even the system working as it's meant to seems anachronistic at best. I can see why Mogg is a fan of pretending we're not even into the 20th century yet, but for the rest of them it's just weird and surely they should have better uses of their time!
There's a rumour of a disagreement between Rees Mogg and Johnson. Apparently Rees Mogg thinks that formal parliamentary business should be undertaken in Latin, but Johnson disagrees and is insistent on Ancient Greek.
Classic
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17875
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

cashead wrote:So, uh, how about that Covid-19, huh?
Very nice.

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12273
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mikey Brown »

Stones of granite wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Stones of granite wrote: There's a rumour of a disagreement between Rees Mogg and Johnson. Apparently Rees Mogg thinks that formal parliamentary business should be undertaken in Latin, but Johnson disagrees and is insistent on Ancient Greek.
And there I was assuming it was the old double-breasted suit or single breasted suit debate rearing its ugly head again.
Let’s not get started on the six kids with one woman or three.
Johnson always looks like he's grabbed someone else's jacket in the rush to get out of someone else's bedroom.
Someone I know worked on an event where they got to watch Johnson rehearse his ‘just-rolled-out-of-bed, oh shit, sorry I’m late folks, forgot I was speaking at this event today’ routine ahead of time. It must have been strange to watch in an empty room.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10568
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

In other news Farage will no longer be hosting a show on LBC. I know that will truly upset everyone.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12273
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mikey Brown »

Ha. Old now but I hadn't ever seen this before. The inner workings of politics huh.

User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10568
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

I do wonder if a dog would actually win in some constituencies if they wore the right colour of rosette?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17875
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Sandydragon wrote:I do wonder if a dog would actually win in some constituencies if they wore the right colour of rosette?
Ooh, I can answer that one! Yes they would.

Meanwhile, Boris Johnson has set up "a cross-governmental commission to look at all aspects of racial inequality in the UK" and has decided the best person to lead it is someone who has been loud about institutional racism being a myth and that "the current accusations of institutional racism by lobbyists and activists" are "a perception more than a reality".

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 1592315368

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

Why did they slow down for a protestor running in front of the PMs car? That doesn't feel like the right thing to do
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9389
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Which Tyler »



Since when was pemission required to expose corruption?
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 5128
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Which Tyler wrote:

Since when was pemission required to expose corruption?
That Jenrick isn't under investigation (and at risk of automatic removal from office) shows how weak our controls are. If this happened in Russia, or Africa, or Latin America it would be taken as an indication of a corrupt regime.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

So Boris unveils his great plan, we're going to borrow and build, borrow and build, and then for the variation borrow and build.

Maybe the plans will be for infrastructure that creates future growth and really gets a bang for the buck, and maybe the plans will take account of climate change, but in advance I'm not anticipating competency
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10568
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Its only a £5billion pot, it won't go that far.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

And most of that was already announced, turns out he was just expelling some hot air
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17875
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:And most of that was already announced, turns out he was just expelling some hot air
This my shocked face.

Mind, he has really surprised me with his offer of residence to the Hong Kongers owed a British Overseas Passport. It's the morally right thing to do, a strong censure to China, and a very sensible bit of foreign policy and diplomacy, which still leaves me baffled as to how it's come from the mouth of Boris Johnson.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

I'm pleased about the offer of sanctuary to holders of BOP in HK too. I'm not sure it's sensible, but it seems the right thing to do
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

I'm not really sure if this deserves to be in this thread or the Brexit one, either way it's a lot of money being used to get something at best comparable to Galileo

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-53279783

And it's only a lot of money to buy into an American company that we'd joint own with an Indian communications company, we could still face hurdles with the US dependent on what we want to do with the technology, especially when it comes to any Chinese involvements. It's certainly not the UK alternative we were told we'd have, and it's only a few hundred million to buy in, it's going to take billions more for an idea that might not work out.

Yet another giant fuck up courtesy of Brexit, but with Boris in charge debt is a problem for the future and providing that's not his future he doesn't seem to care
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

OneWeb as a construct wasn't intended to be used for a navigational system payload, so we're going to have to see if as a concept it can be converted despite it operating at an orbit height around 1/17th of other navigational systems proven to work. I'm sure OneWeb did a terrific job selling the UK government this wouldn't be a problem, but they were failing and looking for any path out of bankruptcy having laid off more than 80% if their workforce and simply keeping enough people in place to keep current satellites (or their capital spend to date) in orbit whilst desperately seeking new investment, but this isn't proven and the UK government has a miserably bad record on technology projects.

I presume we're buying into OneWeb rather than starting our own UK company because of the hope it'll be cheaper to try and piggy back a system that was meant for something else, though Galileo was better and cheaper than either of those options, so again hearty congratulations to team Brexit you useless lying wankers
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

Having just posted the above 2 comments I've just now read an article on a website which seems to be more about technology updates than any particular bias, but others might know as left/right or perhaps more importantly remain/batshit crazy in bias

https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/30/oneweb_bs/
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Digby »

Another update (and he does concede this might not be a stupid move by the UK government and it might even pay off, but there are some concerns raised)




I can say chatting to some maths gurus at a well known tech company named after a river not quite as long as the Nile they're pissing themselves with laughter, even the British one who's pro Brexit and pro Trump (and in a really bad mood he can't get back out to New York from Sutton Coldfield) is between laughter and pain from his chin hitting the floor
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stones of granite »

I've no idea what the rationale is behind this investment, but one thing seems clear to me - it can't be about creating yet another GNSS system. It just doesn't make any sense from either a technical or commercial perspective (who wants to be 5th to the market..?).

There must be some reason for it that hasn't been disclosed yet, and so far I have been unable to come up with a convincing guess.
Post Reply