Cricket fred

Post Reply
Big D
Posts: 5592
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Banquo wrote:England doubling down on dropping Broad'n'Jimmy - Robinson crocked.... next man in line....Liam Norwell (nope...no clue)
Dropping your two best then playing Woakes and Overton rather than having a look at AN Other is a bit questionable,
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Down to 17-2 already. Brave new England.

Puja
Backist Monk
p/d
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by p/d »

Puja wrote:Down to 17-2 already. Brave new England.

Puja
Made 27-3 look like a strong position
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

p/d wrote:
Puja wrote:Down to 17-2 already. Brave new England.

Puja
Made 27-3 look like a strong position
48-4 is practically a recovery.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14553
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

It’s getting to the point where I’d support us invading the Canaries so I don’t have to watch our national sports teams being shit.
p/d
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by p/d »

I blame Tavare
p/d
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by p/d »

Puja wrote:
p/d wrote:
Puja wrote:Down to 17-2 already. Brave new England.

Puja
Made 27-3 look like a strong position
48-4 is practically a recovery.

Puja
:D
fivepointer
Posts: 5878
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

p/d wrote:I blame Tavare
I'd take him in a heartbeat right now.

Still, we managed to crawl to lunch without losing another wicket. Small steps and all that....
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14553
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote:I blame Tavare
Jim?
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Big D wrote:
Banquo wrote:England doubling down on dropping Broad'n'Jimmy - Robinson crocked.... next man in line....Liam Norwell (nope...no clue)
Dropping your two best then playing Woakes and Overton rather than having a look at AN Other is a bit questionable,
a tad
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4290
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

nosebleed territory now..
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

well done yjb
fivepointer
Posts: 5878
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Very good recovery. We could have subsided to 120 all out but Bairstow played a great hand.
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Very good recovery. We could have subsided to 120 all out but Bairstow played a great hand.
but then a bit of a collapse again today. YJB done good tho
Big D
Posts: 5592
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Big D wrote:Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
well yes. Whoever thought Woakes and Overton would be a better opening pair than A and B is mad, Andrew Strauss. Woakes is historically hopeless outside the UK (and maybe Durban).
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

seriously shyte bowling. But you can't be surprised I suppose. No sign of Stokes bowling either.

Woakes and Leach are at the wrong ends...Joe. And Leach's field is wrong....Joe. He really isn't a great skipper.
Big D
Posts: 5592
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Banquo wrote:seriously shyte bowling. But you can't be surprised I suppose. No sign of Stokes bowling either.

Woakes and Leach are at the wrong ends...Joe. And Leach's field is wrong....Joe. He really isn't a great skipper.
Leach is on the wrong continent. Shouldn't have been playing.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Banquo wrote:
Big D wrote:Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
well yes. Whoever thought Woakes and Overton would be a better opening pair than A and B is mad, Andrew Strauss. Woakes is historically hopeless outside the UK (and maybe Durban).
I can absolutely understand dropping Anderson and Broad for this series, as they're not going to last forever and it gives them a break and a chance to see fresh faces to see who can cut it at this level. We've chucked enough chances at county batsmen over the last few years, so we may as well see if we can rustle up a bowler.

Doing that and then picking Overton and Woakes though defies belief. It's like there were two independent selection panels that didn't talk to one another - one that dropped A & B to see who else there was and then one that picked the most experienced team from the players on tour anyway.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Big D wrote:Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
well yes. Whoever thought Woakes and Overton would be a better opening pair than A and B is mad, Andrew Strauss. Woakes is historically hopeless outside the UK (and maybe Durban).
I can absolutely understand dropping Anderson and Broad for this series, as they're not going to last forever and it gives them a break and a chance to see fresh faces to see who can cut it at this level. We've chucked enough chances at county batsmen over the last few years, so we may as well see if we can rustle up a bowler.

Doing that and then picking Overton and Woakes though defies belief. It's like there were two independent selection panels that didn't talk to one another - one that dropped A & B to see who else there was and then one that picked the most experienced team from the players on tour anyway.

Puja
well quite. And why drop both anyway.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4290
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Wo-verton not pulling up trees ..if there's little help from the pitch the basics need to be spot on.
Looks like WI may sneak a first inns. lead :|
fivepointer
Posts: 5878
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Its very flat. Not sure any quick would be thrilled to bowl on this.
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Its very flat. Not sure any quick would be thrilled to bowl on this.
...maybe, but you'd expect test opening bowlers with a new ball to trouble the two currently batting, surely? Both of them average less than 30 in FC cricket.
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

breakthrough, lets hope they can get rid of the tailsharpish. Hmm..
Banquo
Posts: 19070
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Wood crocked. FFS.
Post Reply