Page 137 of 162
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:03 pm
by Puja
Piss.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:06 pm
by Stom
Typical. Last ball before lunch and all...
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:19 pm
by Mellsblue
Stom wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:06 pm
Typical. Last ball before lunch and all...
Tell me he’s a batsman for England without telling me he’s a batsman for England.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:38 pm
by Banquo
Stom wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:06 pm
Typical. Last ball before lunch and all...
was a ripper
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:46 pm
by Puja
Crucial partnership this. England need to get 400 to be par on this pitch, which requires a hundred from one of these.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 2:38 pm
by Banquo
throwin' it all away. Lorra pressure on YJB.
Bar Crawley all soft outs.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 2:40 pm
by Puja
This is turning into a mini-collapse - from 92-1 to 176-5. You felt that, before Pope went, Australia were starting to lose faith and were starting to wilt under the relentless run-rate. As soon as he fell, they've felt back in the game and we've just been leaking wickets.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 2:54 pm
by Puja
Just seen the replay for Brook's dismissal - utterly ridiculous luck. Very sensibly leaves a Lyon ball on line and length that was bouncing over and spinning down leg, only for the ball to richochet off his thigh pad, fly high into the air, land on his back, hit the pitch and then spin backwards into his stumps. Absolutely nothing you can do with that, except what he did, which was shake your head and walk off laughing.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 3:18 pm
by Banquo
i suppose the bright side is that under previous regimes we'd be 120-5 rather than 210-5 (possibly).
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:21 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 3:18 pm
i suppose the bright side is that under previous regimes we'd be 120-5 rather than 210-5 (possibly).
That's the thing, isn't it? May as well make hay for a quick 35-40 rather than be boxed into a corner and get out for a scratchy 17-18.
Root and Bairstow wrenching the game back - 262-5 with Root starting to reverse scoop Boland for 6. A wicket will still make the outlook very different, but looking better now and we're batting deeper than usual with Moeen still to come.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:24 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:21 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 3:18 pm
i suppose the bright side is that under previous regimes we'd be 120-5 rather than 210-5 (possibly).
That's the thing, isn't it? May as well make hay for a quick 35-40 rather than be boxed into a corner and get out for a scratchy 17-18.
Root and Bairstow wrenching the game back - 262-5 with Root starting to reverse scoop Boland for 6. A wicket will still make the outlook very different, but looking better now and we're batting deeper than usual with Moeen still to come.
Puja
Yjb remarkable after so long out and under a lot of pressure. Pleased to be wrong about him a couple of years back.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:43 pm
by Stom
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:24 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:21 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 3:18 pm
i suppose the bright side is that under previous regimes we'd be 120-5 rather than 210-5 (possibly).
That's the thing, isn't it? May as well make hay for a quick 35-40 rather than be boxed into a corner and get out for a scratchy 17-18.
Root and Bairstow wrenching the game back - 262-5 with Root starting to reverse scoop Boland for 6. A wicket will still make the outlook very different, but looking better now and we're batting deeper than usual with Moeen still to come.
Puja
Yjb remarkable after so long out and under a lot of pressure. Pleased to be wrong about him a couple of years back.
Why did you say that?
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:52 pm
by Banquo
Stom wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:43 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:24 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:21 pm
That's the thing, isn't it? May as well make hay for a quick 35-40 rather than be boxed into a corner and get out for a scratchy 17-18.
Root and Bairstow wrenching the game back - 262-5 with Root starting to reverse scoop Boland for 6. A wicket will still make the outlook very different, but looking better now and we're batting deeper than usual with Moeen still to come.
Puja
Yjb remarkable after so long out and under a lot of pressure. Pleased to be wrong about him a couple of years back.
Why did you say that?
Cos he had another run of bad scores after being recalled for the third time and had a major technical fault on the off stump and his overall average was 34, and we had plenty of lower middle order options. He then promptly got into a mega rich vein of form
Played well here, but like Stokes got himself out.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:54 pm
by Stom
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:52 pm
Stom wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:43 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:24 pm
Yjb remarkable after so long out and under a lot of pressure. Pleased to be wrong about him a couple of years back.
Why did you say that?
Cos he had another run of bad scores after being recalled for the third time and had a major technical fault on the off stump and his overall average was 34, and we had plenty of lower middle order options. He then promptly got into a mega rich vein of form
Played well here, but like Stokes got himself out.
Literally read your comment as he got out, lol.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 5:03 pm
by Puja
Moeen's clearly understood the assignment - 18 off 15 balls so far, including a 6 and a 4 off a Cummins over.
ETA. And stumped. Bugger.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 5:04 pm
by Banquo
Suppose you have to take the rough with the smooth with Bazball but Ali and YJB were very rash and have let Aus right back.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 5:06 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 5:03 pm
Moeen's clearly understood the assignment - 18 off 15 balls so far, including a 6 and a 4 off a Cummins over.
ETA. And stumped. Bugger.
Puja
As above, I think that was daft. There were men out for it as well had he connected. The earlier batsmen were scoring at 5 an over knocking into gaps.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 5:53 pm
by Banquo
Root you legend.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 5:57 pm
by Banquo
Robinson been excellent supporting him to his ton
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 6:01 pm
by Banquo
wow.....declaration.....not sure. we shall see
Lyon....bowled well, but conceded near 150 ....must be some sort of near record in one day?
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 6:18 pm
by Puja
Declaration. Bloody hell, no-one can ever question whether Stokes has minerals. Wouldn't've been what I'd do - could've been another 50-60 runs left with Root still in and Robinson hardly looking shaky, but it's knocking the Aussies off-balance and far better than if we lost the last two wickets cheaply and gave them the upper hand. If we get a wicket tonight, it was the right call. Otherwise, I'm really not sure.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 6:33 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 6:18 pm
Declaration. Bloody hell, no-one can ever question whether Stokes has minerals. Wouldn't've been what I'd do - could've been another 50-60 runs left with Root still in and Robinson hardly looking shaky, but it's knocking the Aussies off-balance and far better than if we lost the last two wickets cheaply and gave them the upper hand. If we get a wicket tonight, it was the right call. Otherwise, I'm really not sure.
Puja
Yep as I thought too. And no wicket….so let’s see. Fair play, unconventional- no Jimmy to open too.
Great days cricket. What a great game test cricket is.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 11:39 am
by Banquo
yeah...that yjb

Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 2:53 pm
by Banquo
Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2023 11:39 am
yeah...that yjb
yeah but...shame about missed stumping, easy one
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 5:47 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2023 2:53 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2023 11:39 am
yeah...that yjb
yeah but...shame about missed stumping, easy one
And now a dropped catch. He's just not a Test quality wicketkeeper and, when chances are as rare as they have been on this track, he'll cost more runs than the batting difference between him and Foakes. I think we need him as a batter or not at all.
Not a clue who we'd drop for him though. Possibly Pope, although that requires pushing Root to 3 where he doesn't want to go.
Puja