RugbyRebels

Mike Pence looks like he would enjoy getting wanked off by a young farm labourer whilst being choked with a silk tie.

morepork wrote:Mike Pence looks like he would enjoy getting wanked off by a young farm labourer whilst being choked with a silk tie.

That's a pretty specific theoretical MP

WaspInWales wrote:

morepork wrote:Mike Pence looks like he would enjoy getting wanked off by a young farm labourer whilst being choked with a silk tie.

That's a pretty specific theoretical MP

I guess it's the colonial equivalent of hanging from the ceiling with an orange in your mouth...

I believe Pence refers to it as tickling the tabernackle

As America hurtles toward outright white supremism, the President deflects by going full retard and announces an intent to create a "Space Force" as a distinct arm of the military. I quote, “We are going to have a space force,” Trump said in Washington D.C. “An Air Force and a Space Force. Separate, but equal.”

I shit you not.

morepork wrote:As America hurtles toward outright white supremism, the President deflects by going full retard and announces an intent to create a "Space Force" as a distinct arm of the military. I quote, “We are going to have a space force,” Trump said in Washington D.C. “An Air Force and a Space Force. Separate, but equal.”

I shit you not.

I bet he assigns a certain Commander B. Lightyear as the man in charge of the operation as he's heard great things about him, great, great things and he will do a good job for us.

Donald Lightyear

Has he spoken on whether it locks in the USA as the #1 military nation or will simply hasten a space arms race?

Digby wrote:Has he spoken on whether it locks in the USA as the #1 military nation or will simply hasten a space arms race?

I think an industry lobbyist showed him some stills from Thunderbirds, and he was all too willing to hand over squillions in taxpayer money. If he looks like getting cold feet they have some actual props from the second Terminator movie. Donel has a real good handle of stuff to do with space, as he demonstrated last year:

“At some point in the future, we’re going to look back and say how did we do it without space?”

A government "Space Counsel" is chaired by renowned astrophysicist and intelligent design sexual deviant, Mike Pence, who Donel has previously said is "really into space".


What a champion.

Has anyone told him he'd get a much bigger return if he spent just 20% of the money and gave it to NASA not the military?

To be fair a very wise man did once say it's about the future because that's where we're going

morepork wrote:A government "Space Counsel" is chaired by renowned astrophysicist and intelligent design sexual deviant, Mike Pence, who Donel has previously said is "really into space".

Probably got his words mixed up again...he meant cavities.

morepork wrote:As America hurtles toward outright white supremism, the President deflects by going full retard and announces an intent to create a "Space Force" as a distinct arm of the military. I quote, “We are going to have a space force,” Trump said in Washington D.C. “An Air Force and a Space Force. Separate, but equal.”

I shit you not.

I take it that Fox ran an advert for Solo approximatley 3 minutes before the tweet?

Digby wrote:Has anyone told him he'd get a much bigger return if he spent just 20% of the money and gave it to NASA not the military?

Nah, don't be silly.
A] NASA don't like guns
B} Actually, NASA doesn't really like anyting that explodes.
C] Nasa keep trying to tell his the world is the wrong shape; but he's never falled off the planet, so it must be flat!

Do not watch that shit man. It's just offensive.You know the Terry's Chocolate Orange is taking cues from it.

"It is not enough to merely have an American presence in space. We must have American dominance in space"

Umm.....yeah.

Coco wrote:

Digby wrote:

Coco wrote:Well I hope he can do/initiate/negotiate something everyone can get behind.

Having to say nice things about Trump Vs dying in a nuclear war..., I think a lot of people might be on the fence about that one. At the very least any praise will be highly qualified that he remains a fat, ignorant, odious piece of shit, and an incredibly stupid piece of shit at that, I would allow he's very orange as far as shit goes.

Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.

Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Mellsblue wrote:

Splitting up families like they have is a fucking disgrace. It sounds very much like the authorities are failing in their duty of care to those children.

Donny osmond wrote:

Coco wrote:

Digby wrote:
Having to say nice things about Trump Vs dying in a nuclear war..., I think a lot of people might be on the fence about that one. At the very least any praise will be highly qualified that he remains a fat, ignorant, odious piece of shit, and an incredibly stupid piece of shit at that, I would allow he's very orange as far as shit goes.

Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.

Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

I'm sure some of his core supporting group are well up for it.

Ann Coulter is a real piece of work though.

However, it seems to have caused quite a stir and backlash with some Republicans too.

As if sticking kids in cages wasn't enough to win the hearts and minds of everyone, Trump has withdrawn the US from the UN Human Rights Council on account of it being biased:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372

Irony much?

Yet again, it seems Trump is doing Bibi's bidding.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372

Sandydragon wrote:

Mellsblue wrote:

Splitting up families like they have is a fucking disgrace. It sounds very much like the authorities are failing in their duty of care to those children.

oh no, they're duty, as coming from above, is to make life as miserable as possible. IIRC some of the "regimes" children have been placed with known human traffickers (AKA "slavers")

Oh, and hidden amongst this message https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
US have quite the UN Council on Human Rights... due to their "chronic anti-Isreal bias" (AKA literally letting Israel get away with murder)


ETA: Ninja.d "another post has been made..."

WaspInWales wrote:As if sticking kids in cages wasn't enough to win the hearts and minds of everyone, Trump has withdrawn the US from the UN Human Rights Council on account of it being biased:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372

Irony much?

Yet again, it seems Trump is doing Bibi's bidding.

Fucking hell. 'Murrica is going to have to dig hard to clear this smear. As will these complicit genital warts that promote it. Military contracts seem a common point of focus. As does the dogma of white people. The narrative is fucking grim here and I'm not proud to be involved by virtue of residence.

Donny osmond wrote:

Coco wrote:

Digby wrote:
Having to say nice things about Trump Vs dying in a nuclear war..., I think a lot of people might be on the fence about that one. At the very least any praise will be highly qualified that he remains a fat, ignorant, odious piece of shit, and an incredibly stupid piece of shit at that, I would allow he's very orange as far as shit goes.

Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.

Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Very much so. What most people dont understand is that families that cross at a port of entry and claim asylum are not separated, as the parents have not crossed illegally or put their child/children in danger by doing so. There are at least 25 (i think?) ports of entry along our southern border. If you truly and legitimately want asylum for your family, there is no reason not to cross legally and get it done.

You understand that there are quite a few trafficked children that need protection, too. If it cannot be determined that a child belongs to or with the adults they crossed with, they take the child to a safer facility until it can be determined that the child belongs to the adult, and will be safe with them. Quite a few other factors are at play that get conveniently overlooked by main stream on both sides. Tossing your child in the trunk of a coyotes car to travel across the 118 degree desert with no water or guarantee they will be safe seems pretty dangerous and irresponsible.

It is not as simple as "they are ripping children out of their loving parents arms" Some of the so-called parents arent even related or known to the children...it is a very heartbreaking situation. Would you rather these adults just be allowed to take off with children they cannot prove are theirs? Would that make everyone feel better? Do you think it's safe for a lot of these children???

This narrative really pisses me off because 99% of people do not comprehend what is actually going on down here and cannot wrap their head around the possibility that while yes it is not ideal, and yes some legitimate families get temporarily separated, it is probably in the best interest of the children.

Coco wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:

Coco wrote:
Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.

Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Very much so. What most people dont understand is that families that cross at a port of entry and claim asylum are not separated, as the parents have not crossed illegally or put their child/children in danger by doing so. There are at least 25 (i think?) ports of entry along our southern border. If you truly and legitimately want asylum for your family, there is no reason not to cross legally and get it done.

You understand that there are quite a few trafficked children that need protection, too. If it cannot be determined that a child belongs to or with the adults they crossed with, they take the child to a safer facility until it can be determined that the child belongs to the adult, and will be safe with them. Quite a few other factors are at play that get conveniently overlooked by main stream on both sides. Tossing your child in the trunk of a coyotes car to travel across the 118 degree desert with no water or guarantee they will be safe seems pretty dangerous and irresponsible.

It is not as simple as "they are ripping children out of their loving parents arms" Some of the so-called parents arent even related or known to the children...it is a very heartbreaking situation. Would you rather these adults just be allowed to take off with children they cannot prove are theirs? Would that make everyone feel better? Do you think it's safe for a lot of these children???

This narrative really pisses me off because 99% of people do not comprehend what is actually going on down here and cannot wrap their head around the possibility that while yes it is not ideal, and yes some legitimate families get temporarily separated, it is probably in the best interest of the children.

Ok so images and videos of children being kept in cages is being beamed around the world, and your answer is to speculate that it is stopping *some* illegal immigrants *some* of whom may or may not be the parents of those children. How many illegals is it stopping and is that pitifully small number really a justification for the actual mental torture being inflicted on those kids? For the record, the fact that some people may not be treating their kids right wouldnt usually count as justification for the fucking american government to also, deliberately, engage in equally abhorrent practise.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk