v AB'S - Second Test
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
The NZ herald have given Itoje a 4/10.
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
That was pretty much the perfect scenario for the Lions. And it still almost went wrong.
Read showed a huge amount of dignity in the face of awful questioning.
Not sure all on this board are doing likewise.
SBW call spot on. Didn't see the SOB one (kid acting up). Mako ones looked about right to me. Ref did seem a tad inept overall thought.
Next week could get ugly.
Read showed a huge amount of dignity in the face of awful questioning.
Not sure all on this board are doing likewise.
SBW call spot on. Didn't see the SOB one (kid acting up). Mako ones looked about right to me. Ref did seem a tad inept overall thought.
Next week could get ugly.
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Does anyone know what happened during the All Blacks 'line of honour'? Just seen the press conferences and Hansen is asked about the incident and whether he is disappointed with it.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 11:04 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
These guys do some great reviews: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvv-9n ... FKg/videos
One irish, one kiwi.
Not always in line with this board, but some very nice insight.
Worth a watch
One irish, one kiwi.
Not always in line with this board, but some very nice insight.
Worth a watch
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Graham bloody Simmons. Makes Sonia on the beeb look professional.
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
absolute c*nt. I hate interviews w players and coaches straight after a game anyway, but he makes it tortureskidger wrote:Graham bloody Simmons. Makes Sonia on the beeb look professional.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
So much this. Has any single one of these "interviews" ever yielded a single worthwhile insight?Banquo wrote:absolute c*nt. I hate interviews w players and coaches straight after a game anyway, but he makes it tortureskidger wrote:Graham bloody Simmons. Makes Sonia on the beeb look professional.
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
16th man wrote:So much this. Has any single one of these "interviews" ever yielded a single worthwhile insight?Banquo wrote:absolute c*nt. I hate interviews w players and coaches straight after a game anyway, but he makes it tortureskidger wrote:Graham bloody Simmons. Makes Sonia on the beeb look professional.
Just the two. They are shite. And that Graham Simmons has a huge ego.
- oldbackrow
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
- Location: Darkest Rotherham
- Contact:
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
No Vunipola got yellow for clearing out the man away from the ball! I know its unusual for a NZ forward to do that sort of clearout (and not come in like an exocet missile) but it does happen on occasions! Also would need to see it again but it looked to me as if it caught his shoulder first. Barrett certainly milked both that and the previous contact (given that Vunipola went in front of him and not into him)cashead wrote: No, Vunipola got a yellow for striking Barrett's head - which, if going by the precedent set by Garces himself earlier in the game, should've been a red.
Yes Garces wasn't the best ref but not as bad as I think you are trying to make out. Many of the Lions penalties were around half way, which is then very difficult for a ref to yellow card for repeated infringements. That tends to kept for 'red zone' penalties.
Should be an interesting and tense game next week.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Maro 4/10 Itoje?Banquo wrote:who was the motm?
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
From the replay I saw it seemed that Sinckler was still celebrating (doing his best Ric Flair impression) and Farrell told him to shut up.skidger wrote:Does anyone know what happened during the All Blacks 'line of honour'? Just seen the press conferences and Hansen is asked about the incident and whether he is disappointed with it.
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Oh dear. A very good prospect but has a lot of growing up to do.Freddo wrote:From the replay I saw it seemed that Sinckler was still celebrating (doing his best Ric Flair impression) and Farrell told him to shut up.skidger wrote:Does anyone know what happened during the All Blacks 'line of honour'? Just seen the press conferences and Hansen is asked about the incident and whether he is disappointed with it.
- Puja
- Posts: 17466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Indeed. When the match-winning penalty was conceded (from a frankly appalling decision, considering Sinckler caused it by jumping into a tackle, which is against the laws), Sinckler actually sprang up from the floor looking for a fight after having been "fouled". Showed good pre-emptive management from the Lions leaders that SOB and Farrell were watching for it and were on his shoulder instantly to lead him away and tell him not to be a twat and get the penalty reversed.skidger wrote:Oh dear. A very good prospect but has a lot of growing up to do.Freddo wrote:From the replay I saw it seemed that Sinckler was still celebrating (doing his best Ric Flair impression) and Farrell told him to shut up.skidger wrote:Does anyone know what happened during the All Blacks 'line of honour'? Just seen the press conferences and Hansen is asked about the incident and whether he is disappointed with it.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Just seen the Mako yellow, only from one camera angle, barely even a penalty in the modern game and certainly not commensurate with the actions of Williams
- oldbackrow
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
- Location: Darkest Rotherham
- Contact:
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Don't often disagree with you, but in this case afraid I must! Sinkler 'jumped' for the high pass off Murray and was hit before he hit the ground, how many times does it happen but Law 10.4 (e) makes it clear and therefore a penalty. There is no direct law about "jumping into a tackle" although the ref could consider it dangerous play (like they enforce that when someone dives over a ruck to score!)Puja wrote:Indeed. When the match-winning penalty was conceded (from a frankly appalling decision, considering Sinckler caused it by jumping into a tackle, which is against the laws), Sinckler actually sprang up from the floor looking for a fight after having been "fouled". Showed good pre-emptive management from the Lions leaders that SOB and Farrell were watching for it and were on his shoulder instantly to lead him away and tell him not to be a twat and get the penalty reversed.skidger wrote:Oh dear. A very good prospect but has a lot of growing up to do.Freddo wrote: From the replay I saw it seemed that Sinckler was still celebrating (doing his best Ric Flair impression) and Farrell told him to shut up.
Puja
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I reckon we got that penalty as he was looking for the next possible opportunity. having let the AB front row off with collapsing the last scrum.Puja wrote:Indeed. When the match-winning penalty was conceded (from a frankly appalling decision, considering Sinckler caused it by jumping into a tackle, which is against the laws), Sinckler actually sprang up from the floor looking for a fight after having been "fouled". Showed good pre-emptive management from the Lions leaders that SOB and Farrell were watching for it and were on his shoulder instantly to lead him away and tell him not to be a twat and get the penalty reversed.skidger wrote:Oh dear. A very good prospect but has a lot of growing up to do.Freddo wrote: From the replay I saw it seemed that Sinckler was still celebrating (doing his best Ric Flair impression) and Farrell told him to shut up.
Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I don't much like the penalty Sinkler won by jumping into the tackle, even if for a pass, but I don't know that's the match winning play. There are thousands of incidents in a game, if you're that bothered a late incident doesn't give you a chance to respond do better in the earlier incidents.
- morepork
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Digby wrote:I don't much like the penalty Sinkler won by jumping into the tackle, even if for a pass, but I don't know that's the match winning play. There are thousands of incidents in a game, if you're that bothered a late incident doesn't give you a chance to respond do better in the earlier incidents.
The broader point is that they scraped through against 14 men by looking for penalties. Again, see you next week sir. Next week I say.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I don't disagree. Though I suspect many wouldn't agree that ideally next week finishes in a draw so neither side wins.morepork wrote:Digby wrote:I don't much like the penalty Sinkler won by jumping into the tackle, even if for a pass, but I don't know that's the match winning play. There are thousands of incidents in a game, if you're that bothered a late incident doesn't give you a chance to respond do better in the earlier incidents.
The broader point is that they scraped through against 14 men by looking for penalties. Again, see you next week sir. Next week I say.
- Puja
- Posts: 17466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Heh - we're not the side that's just shown themselves to be boring, constantly kicking for goal, and incapable of try scoring. Reduce penalties down to 2 points, in my opinion, to combat this drear New Zealand style!morepork wrote:Digby wrote:I don't much like the penalty Sinkler won by jumping into the tackle, even if for a pass, but I don't know that's the match winning play. There are thousands of incidents in a game, if you're that bothered a late incident doesn't give you a chance to respond do better in the earlier incidents.
The broader point is that they scraped through against 14 men by looking for penalties. Again, see you next week sir. Next week I say.
Puja
Backist Monk
- oldbackrow
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
- Location: Darkest Rotherham
- Contact:
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Puja wrote:
Heh - we're not the side that's just shown themselves to be boring, constantly kicking for goal, and incapable of try scoring. Reduce penalties down to 2 points, in my opinion, to combat this drear New Zealand style!
Puja

- morepork
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
ooooh you will eat those words.
Maybe.
Maybe.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:35 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
The Lions did their best to throw this game away, we were doing better before Williams got sent off, but they did what was needed and won, should be some game next week.
Nice to see an All Black get the same treatment as everyone else for a change, getting justice for their skulduggery.
Nice to see an All Black get the same treatment as everyone else for a change, getting justice for their skulduggery.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Two tries to nil, mate, 2-0.morepork wrote:Digby wrote:I don't much like the penalty Sinkler won by jumping into the tackle, even if for a pass, but I don't know that's the match winning play. There are thousands of incidents in a game, if you're that bothered a late incident doesn't give you a chance to respond do better in the earlier incidents.
The broader point is that they scraped through against 14 men by looking for penalties. Again, see you next week sir. Next week I say.
Makes next week far more interesting.