Cricket fred
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Oh well.
Another innings where Root and Bairstow didn’t turn up
Another innings where Root and Bairstow didn’t turn up
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
yep. Unfortunately the pair of them tend to have runs of poor form- Root obviously has a load of credit in the bank, but a bit frustrating.
Difference is that none of our batsmen have scored more than 76 (Crawley 76 and 73, only one to top 50) but the indians have a double and single century.
Hartley is a good un, battler.
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
-
- Posts: 5579
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Good knock by Duckett.
High praised for Foakes from Gilchrist:
High praised for Foakes from Gilchrist:
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
soft middle order again, Root and YJB very poor this series so far. YJB maybe needs pensioning out of test cricket.
-
- Posts: 5817
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Shocking day for England. Utterly brainless at times with a complete inability to play sensibly given the circumstances.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Wasteful.
..& more sad news
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/68292770
so many true-greats passing on now it seems;
'Proctorshire' were formidable when he was firing - genuine all rounder too. RiP.
..& more sad news
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/68292770
so many true-greats passing on now it seems;
'Proctorshire' were formidable when he was firing - genuine all rounder too. RiP.
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
he was a great great playerGalfon wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 9:12 pm Wasteful.
..& more sad news
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/68292770
so many true-greats passing on now it seems;
'Proctorshire' were formidable when he was firing - genuine all rounder too. RiP.
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
This might be fun, if not short lived.
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Chasing a quick single. That’s the way!!
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
When you know one of you has to hit at least a double century you can’t go fishing.
So Root and Bairstow to show why they were selected
So Root and Bairstow to show why they were selected
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
sh*t or bust. The former, sadly. Terrible two days from England, hope they don't change philosophy, just shot selection and catching practice. YJB might want to go before he's pushed.
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
But isn't poor shot choice part of the philosophy?
I mean the best we could have expected when our openers took guard was a draw. And yet…
I mean the best we could have expected when our openers took guard was a draw. And yet…
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Hartley returns best bowling figures and now our top scorer
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Not at all. The philosophy - which has been brilliant- is to play attacking cricket. That doesn't equal stupid shots- people have been having a go at Root for playing ramp shots, but with his skill and expertise its always been a productive shot in his test locker-- his strike rate has always been high, so all the folks saying 'bazball doesn't fit with his game' are talking bs frankly- he's just in bad nick, he's had these often before.
and the 'best we could have expected' has been turned on its head, that's exactly the point of it (in this case had we batted to the end of tomorrow, we'd have faced c 140 overs ish...4 an over gives you a win).
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
cue panic ....mind, 8th worst defeat in test history needs some thought!
-
- Posts: 5817
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Horrible capitulation.
I'm all for attacking intent but you have to mix aggression with a degree of pragmatic game management. We were in a good position starting the 3rd day and have just been blown away.
I'm all for attacking intent but you have to mix aggression with a degree of pragmatic game management. We were in a good position starting the 3rd day and have just been blown away.
-
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Cricket fred
I get what you are saying but I personally think one leads to the other. Root is an example yes but if only it was him we were talking about.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 11:07 amNot at all. The philosophy - which has been brilliant- is to play attacking cricket. That doesn't equal stupid shots- people have been having a go at Root for playing ramp shots, but with his skill and expertise its always been a productive shot in his test locker-- his strike rate has always been high, so all the folks saying 'bazball doesn't fit with his game' are talking bs frankly- he's just in bad nick, he's had these often before.
and the 'best we could have expected' has been turned on its head, that's exactly the point of it (in this case had we batted to the end of tomorrow, we'd have faced c 140 overs ish...4 an over gives you a win).
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Not necessarily, just good decision making.p/d wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 11:49 amI get what you are saying but I personally think one leads to the other. Root is an example yes but if only it was him we were talking about.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 11:07 amNot at all. The philosophy - which has been brilliant- is to play attacking cricket. That doesn't equal stupid shots- people have been having a go at Root for playing ramp shots, but with his skill and expertise its always been a productive shot in his test locker-- his strike rate has always been high, so all the folks saying 'bazball doesn't fit with his game' are talking bs frankly- he's just in bad nick, he's had these often before.
and the 'best we could have expected' has been turned on its head, that's exactly the point of it (in this case had we batted to the end of tomorrow, we'd have faced c 140 overs ish...4 an over gives you a win).
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
yeah, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Stokes is (usually) the best example of playing to the situation...he nearly always plays himself in for example.fivepointer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 11:37 am Horrible capitulation.
I'm all for attacking intent but you have to mix aggression with a degree of pragmatic game management. We were in a good position starting the 3rd day and have just been blown away.
-
- Posts: 5579
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Cricket fred
He has been needing pensioned off since his injury. Playing him v West Indies and Sri Lanka would be detrimental as he'll score well in the odd innings then keep his place for NZ where he'll be crap again.
With Root, he is having to bowl an awful lot of overs. that is very slight mitigation that YJB doesn't have.
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Big D wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2024 11:24 amHe has been needing pensioned off since his injury. Playing him v West Indies and Sri Lanka would be detrimental as he'll score well in the odd innings then keep his place for NZ where he'll be crap again.
With Root, he is having to bowl an awful lot of overs. that is very slight mitigation that YJB doesn't have.