Ha. That is good work.kk67 wrote:
'Guns have more rights than my vagina'. Quality work there, Sister.
Trump
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
The Manafort trial commences this week with the man himself now having dropped his civil action against Mueller, Iran doesn't perhaps want talks without preconditions having observed Trump's declarations of a win in previous talks, North Korea is perhaps getting back into the nuclear programme, Trump has a plan to save the elites billions in tax that circumvents congress, the good fight is still being taken to sports and the environment, the media are breaking confidences on private conversations where Trump has already gone public with a selective interpretation of reality, there's a possible government shutdown in the offing over funding of the wall, there's plenty more but don't worry because Jared is all over peace in the middle east and the opioid crisis, and somehow it's a normal week in Washington
- Puja
- Posts: 17734
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Trump
It's Manafort that baffles me. He is absolutely dead to rights on tax evasion and will spend the rest of his life in jail unless he makes a deal with Mueller and yet he's determined to go to trial. And why? Out of loyalty to Trump? Surely if the last two years has shown anything, it's that Trump's only loyalty is to himself and he cares nothing for anyone who doesn't directly benefit him.
Can Trump outright pardon him, despite him being clearly and definitively guilty?
Puja
Can Trump outright pardon him, despite him being clearly and definitively guilty?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
Trump can pardon any federal crime he wants. though whether such executive privilege sits alongside any notion of draining the swamp is more than open to question
Mind given he's busy undermining the mmc and staffing it with friends and supporters to the cost of US taxpayers whilst undermining the quality of projects might draw some to conclude he's full of McDonald's, which is to say shit
Mind given he's busy undermining the mmc and staffing it with friends and supporters to the cost of US taxpayers whilst undermining the quality of projects might draw some to conclude he's full of McDonald's, which is to say shit
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9249
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Trump
My understanding* is that pardoning himself (or anyone else) for a federal crime not only still leaves him (or whoever) open to prosecution at the state level; whilst also removing the right to take the 5th - a right that no mobster gives up willingly.Digby wrote:Trump can pardon any federal crime he wants. though whether such executive privilege sits alongside any notion of draining the swamp is more than open to question
Of course, double jeopardy laws may apply, but the separation between federal and state law should see to that; but tinkering with wording almost certainly will.
If he pardons himself, the New York DA will be sniffing blood.
* NB, I have no expertise here - but I do chat to people who seem to know what they're talking about, and can reference their opinions extensively
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
It also depends what the pardon is for
Trump in my view is much more likely to issue very specific pardons he thinks he can get away with and not a blanket pardon to all possible criminal acts, say for unpaid tax which he can probably sell, especially if he was able to claim some tax would be repaid. If that did happen you could of course still take the 5th on issues pertaining to non tax matters
What I don’t know is suppose you're asked in a federal court about a matter you've received a pardon for can you really lose 5th amendment protection if you may face non federal charges? That seems unlikely but the law often surprises
Trump in my view is much more likely to issue very specific pardons he thinks he can get away with and not a blanket pardon to all possible criminal acts, say for unpaid tax which he can probably sell, especially if he was able to claim some tax would be repaid. If that did happen you could of course still take the 5th on issues pertaining to non tax matters
What I don’t know is suppose you're asked in a federal court about a matter you've received a pardon for can you really lose 5th amendment protection if you may face non federal charges? That seems unlikely but the law often surprises
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9249
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Trump
Again, the following is my understanding from listening to people who (seem to) know what they're talking about...
Accepting a pardon is seen as an admission of guilt; and if you've been pardoned, then you cannot incriminate yourself, as that's already happened - so you'd lose the 5th for matters pertaining to that pardon.
And somewhere in there, is enough wriggle-room to keep a lot of lawyers busy and paid for a long time.
Accepting a pardon is seen as an admission of guilt; and if you've been pardoned, then you cannot incriminate yourself, as that's already happened - so you'd lose the 5th for matters pertaining to that pardon.
And somewhere in there, is enough wriggle-room to keep a lot of lawyers busy and paid for a long time.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
Which Tyler wrote:Again, the following is my understanding from listening to people who (seem to) know what they're talking about...
Accepting a pardon is seen as an admission of guilt; and if you've been pardoned, then you cannot incriminate yourself, as that's already happened - so you'd lose the 5th for matters pertaining to that pardon.
And somewhere in there, is enough wriggle-room to keep a lot of lawyers busy and paid for a long time.
Syphoning the inherited wealth off stupid cunts that don't understand the legal system is the national sport in 'Murrica.
- cashead
- Posts: 4015
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am
Re: Trump
A pardon to himself is still tantamount to an admission of guilt since legally, I’ve been told it’s basically “yep, you’re guilty but that’s OK with us.”Which Tyler wrote:My understanding* is that pardoning himself (or anyone else) for a federal crime not only still leaves him (or whoever) open to prosecution at the state level; whilst also removing the right to take the 5th - a right that no mobster gives up willingly.Digby wrote:Trump can pardon any federal crime he wants. though whether such executive privilege sits alongside any notion of draining the swamp is more than open to question
Of course, double jeopardy laws may apply, but the separation between federal and state law should see to that; but tinkering with wording almost certainly will.
If he pardons himself, the New York DA will be sniffing blood.
* NB, I have no expertise here - but I do chat to people who seem to know what they're talking about, and can reference their opinions extensively
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10517
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
In any other time this would be a huge revelation. With Trump it somehow seems normal.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
He really isn't stupid enough to force Sessions to can Mueller's investigation?
Surely not?!?
I'm sure some of his core support will lap it up, but I reckon many will begin to question their support.
Does anyone know if that could lead to a likelihood of impeachment?
Surely not?!?
I'm sure some of his core support will lap it up, but I reckon many will begin to question their support.
Does anyone know if that could lead to a likelihood of impeachment?
- Puja
- Posts: 17734
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Trump
We may as well shut the board down here; I think we've achieved complete entelechy.kk67 wrote:I'll go too far, you'll initially disagree and then we'll find a happy medium whereby we agree they're all a bunch of wankers...?.morepork wrote:Do you want to chat about IP and pharma?
Trump's started hacking away at the Manafort case on Twitter claiming that he's being treated worse than Capone and it's all rigged and biased. Clearly setting it up to be discredited as anti-Trump politics in the eyes of his supporters so that when he pardons him, it can be spun as righting a wrong, rather than cheating the legal system.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
It might lead to impeachment but what it wouldn’t do is end the investigation, it'd only send ownership of the process back to the FBIWaspInWales wrote:He really isn't stupid enough to force Sessions to can Mueller's investigation?
Surely not?!?
I'm sure some of his core support will lap it up, but I reckon many will begin to question their support.
Does anyone know if that could lead to a likelihood of impeachment?
-
- Posts: 12173
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Trump
Meant to say alcohol apparently. What’s the point in even allowing him to speak if he is this error prone?
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Trump
It's reaching a stage where even impeachment won't change anything.Digby wrote:It might lead to impeachment but what it wouldn’t do is end the investigation, it'd only send ownership of the process back to the FBIWaspInWales wrote:He really isn't stupid enough to force Sessions to can Mueller's investigation?
Surely not?!?
I'm sure some of his core support will lap it up, but I reckon many will begin to question their support.
Does anyone know if that could lead to a likelihood of impeachment?
Ken Livingstone is notorious for claiming that 'if voting changed anything, they'd ban it'.
Cunty McCunt Trump is rewriting the political lexicon.