Boxing

Post Reply
User avatar
Parsifal
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:30 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Boxing

Post by Parsifal »

Watched it here in Oz. What a fight.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Showed a bit of bottle and also inexperience that only having 19 fights brings.

Felt he needed a knock down and win the last 2 rounds to win but a stoppage does the job :-)

American and Puerto Rican judge had AJ up by 2 and 3 rounds.

I watched a Showtime stream and they had klitschko up by 1.
User avatar
bruce
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by bruce »

The 5 live boys had Klit up by 3 going into the 11th. Worries about AJs stamina apparently he was gassed by the end of the 4th.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Biggest question from last night is why the hell WK didn't get himself in that shape ornlet his hands go like that v Fury?

He was in far better shape.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by WaspInWales »

Surprised to see a few had AJ ahead at the stoppage. I had Klitschko ahead as he was in control from the 6th.

Still it was a great win for AJ. He looked barely capable of standing upright a few rounds before.

Thought his post fight interview was a bit cringe. Each time he was asked a question, he took the mic, turned his back on the interviewer and addressed the crowd with some bizarre words that didn't answer the question. I thought he was concussed.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

I had WK up by 2. If WK has made it out of 11 AJ would have been 1 up on my card due to a 10-7.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Listened to it on R5. Looking forward to seeing this on tv. Reckon Sky will take their time getting it on.
Saturday at 7 or 730 Eug.
Discreet Hooker
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:55 pm

Re: RE: Re: Boxing

Post by Discreet Hooker »

Big D wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Listened to it on R5. Looking forward to seeing this on tv. Reckon Sky will take their time getting it on.
Saturday at 7 or 730 Eug.

Full fight on youtube with foreign commentary ~ not that you need to be told anything .

Good win for AJ , Klits was up for it and would have snuk it had it gone the distance imo .
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Discreet Hooker wrote:
Big D wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Listened to it on R5. Looking forward to seeing this on tv. Reckon Sky will take their time getting it on.
Saturday at 7 or 730 Eug.

Full fight on youtube with foreign commentary ~ not that you need to be told anything .

Good win for AJ , Klits was up for it and would have snuk it had it gone the distance imo .
The Showtime coverage is on youtube too. Paulie Mallinaggi is one of my favourite boxing pundits.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

I looked at a few online reporters scorecards and there are a lot of 10-10 rounds been given. If the judges give AJ those then I can see how they had him up.

Rounds 1,2,3,5 (10-8), 9 and 10 appear to be the ones that anyone having AJ ahead have given him. I didn't agree with that but I can see the argument for it.

I do laugh at the people who say AJ/Hearn was lucky as it would have been a robbery on points. Not allowing for the fact AJ could win the last two rounds himself.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Big D wrote:I looked at a few online reporters scorecards and there are a lot of 10-10 rounds been given. If the judges give AJ those then I can see how they had him up.

Rounds 1,2,3,5 (10-8), 9 and 10 appear to be the ones that anyone having AJ ahead have given him. I didn't agree with that but I can see the argument for it.

I do laugh at the people who say AJ/Hearn was lucky as it would have been a robbery on points. Not allowing for the fact AJ could win the last two rounds himself.
Are the judges scorecards maybe including round 11? By the sounds of it that was definitely a 10 v 8 if not a 10 v 7.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Judges only score competed rounds.
Discreet Hooker
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:55 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Discreet Hooker »

Big D wrote:Judges only score competed rounds.

Judges superfluous in this one . ;)
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Something that I haven't seen mentioned was the ref's poor performance in the 11th with regards to the knockdowns.

Knockdown 1 - WK goes down with 1.42 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.32 left, WK looks unstable then the ref pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 1.26 left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

Knockdown 2 - WK goes down with 1.15 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.03 left, then pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 56s left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

We are only talking about seconds but it still makes a difference and the ref was very generous to WK. If you watch the 1st knock down again if the ref hadn't pulled him back a second time he was in real deep shit as he was still in a daze.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Boxing

Post by Numbers »

Big D wrote:Something that I haven't seen mentioned was the ref's poor performance in the 11th with regards to the knockdowns.

Knockdown 1 - WK goes down with 1.42 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.32 left, WK looks unstable then the ref pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 1.26 left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

Knockdown 2 - WK goes down with 1.15 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.03 left, then pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 56s left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

We are only talking about seconds but it still makes a difference and the ref was very generous to WK. If you watch the 1st knock down again if the ref hadn't pulled him back a second time he was in real deep shit as he was still in a daze.
Did you notice the slight hit and hold with the uppercut that put Klit down the first time?
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Numbers wrote:
Big D wrote:Something that I haven't seen mentioned was the ref's poor performance in the 11th with regards to the knockdowns.

Knockdown 1 - WK goes down with 1.42 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.32 left, WK looks unstable then the ref pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 1.26 left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

Knockdown 2 - WK goes down with 1.15 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.03 left, then pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 56s left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

We are only talking about seconds but it still makes a difference and the ref was very generous to WK. If you watch the 1st knock down again if the ref hadn't pulled him back a second time he was in real deep shit as he was still in a daze.
Did you notice the slight hit and hold with the uppercut that put Klit down the first time?
My post wasn't pro/anti either fighter, just an observation that the ref was pretty poor in that round. Either fighter would rightly take whatever the ref gives them.

In round 5? Going by the youtube video the only hold I see is Joshua holding and swinging after WK is well on the way down. But the angle in the video I saw is directly behind Joshua. I did notice there was a few times AJ tried to pull WK onto a punch on Saturday though so it wouldn't surprise me.

If you mean round 11, it would be harsh to call that a hold IMO. Joshua swings a left hook and WK ducks and barely avoids it then the uppercut follows.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Boxing

Post by Numbers »

Big D wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Big D wrote:Something that I haven't seen mentioned was the ref's poor performance in the 11th with regards to the knockdowns.

Knockdown 1 - WK goes down with 1.42 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.32 left, WK looks unstable then the ref pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 1.26 left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

Knockdown 2 - WK goes down with 1.15 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.03 left, then pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 56s left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

We are only talking about seconds but it still makes a difference and the ref was very generous to WK. If you watch the 1st knock down again if the ref hadn't pulled him back a second time he was in real deep shit as he was still in a daze.
Did you notice the slight hit and hold with the uppercut that put Klit down the first time?
My post wasn't pro/anti either fighter, just an observation that the ref was pretty poor in that round. Either fighter would rightly take whatever the ref gives them.

In round 5? Going by the youtube video the only hold I see is Joshua holding and swinging after WK is well on the way down. But the angle in the video I saw is directly behind Joshua. I did notice there was a few times AJ tried to pull WK onto a punch on Saturday though so it wouldn't surprise me.

If you mean round 11, it would be harsh to call that a hold IMO. Joshua swings a left hook and WK ducks and barely avoids it then the uppercut follows.

Yeah it was the first knockdown in round 11 I was referring to, with regards to the ref I seem to recall the commentators saying it was his debut pro fight which mat explain a few things.

Things which we learned, AJ does have a slightly suspect chin but has a great deal of heart. Wlad is still a class act at the age of 41.

I wouldn't like to predict a winner in an AJ v Wilder fight, it would be whoever lands first imo.
Big D
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Big D »

Numbers wrote:
Big D wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Did you notice the slight hit and hold with the uppercut that put Klit down the first time?
My post wasn't pro/anti either fighter, just an observation that the ref was pretty poor in that round. Either fighter would rightly take whatever the ref gives them.

In round 5? Going by the youtube video the only hold I see is Joshua holding and swinging after WK is well on the way down. But the angle in the video I saw is directly behind Joshua. I did notice there was a few times AJ tried to pull WK onto a punch on Saturday though so it wouldn't surprise me.

If you mean round 11, it would be harsh to call that a hold IMO. Joshua swings a left hook and WK ducks and barely avoids it then the uppercut follows.

Yeah it was the first knockdown in round 11 I was referring to, with regards to the ref I seem to recall the commentators saying it was his debut pro fight which mat explain a few things.

Things which we learned, AJ does have a slightly suspect chin but has a great deal of heart. Wlad is still a class act at the age of 41.

I wouldn't like to predict a winner in an AJ v Wilder fight, it would be whoever lands first imo.
That's unreal to allow a debut ref at that level of fight.

I just watched rounds 5, 6 and 11 on you tube, AJ ate some big shots, I wonder if he'll end up with a chin slightly less that one like Lennox Lewis. Good enough to eat shots but could go down to a big shot.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Big D wrote:Something that I haven't seen mentioned was the ref's poor performance in the 11th with regards to the knockdowns.

Knockdown 1 - WK goes down with 1.42 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.32 left, WK looks unstable then the ref pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 1.26 left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

Knockdown 2 - WK goes down with 1.15 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.03 left, then pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 56s left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

We are only talking about seconds but it still makes a difference and the ref was very generous to WK. If you watch the 1st knock down again if the ref hadn't pulled him back a second time he was in real deep shit as he was still in a daze.
I seem to remember R5 mentioning it. No one wants to be the ref who stops Wlad early. Mad if he was as inexperienced as suggested.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Boxing

Post by Numbers »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Big D wrote:Something that I haven't seen mentioned was the ref's poor performance in the 11th with regards to the knockdowns.

Knockdown 1 - WK goes down with 1.42 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.32 left, WK looks unstable then the ref pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 1.26 left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

Knockdown 2 - WK goes down with 1.15 left. Ref lets him continue at 1.03 left, then pulls him away again. He then lets them box at 56s left. That is time where WK was being allowed to try and clear his head.

We are only talking about seconds but it still makes a difference and the ref was very generous to WK. If you watch the 1st knock down again if the ref hadn't pulled him back a second time he was in real deep shit as he was still in a daze.
I seem to remember R5 mentioning it. No one wants to be the ref who stops Wlad early. Mad if he was as inexperienced as suggested.
It seems as though the ref was confused, after the count he should see if the fighter is ready to continue, if the fighter isn't ready immediately the fight should be stopped as Big D said.

It seems he isn't inexperienced at all after a bit of digging, tho he is a former sparring partner of the marvellous one which may explain his brain issues:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2017/ ... avyweight/
Discreet Hooker
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:55 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Discreet Hooker »

Yup , he did seem all at sea . Strange choice for such a show piece and a big risk if you upset 90,000 fans .
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Fight available on sky on demand now. That's my evening sorted!
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
Discreet Hooker
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:55 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by Discreet Hooker »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Fight available on sky on demand now. That's my evening sorted!

We won't tell you who won . . . . :o
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Boxing

Post by WaspInWales »

Fury is upping the fighting talk. Is it just talk though? He's been out for a while so a big pay day against AJ would probably be most welcome.

AJ has a suspect chin and questions over his stamina. He finished strongly against WK, but struggled in the previous rounds before the stoppage.

Surely the Gypsy King will be out of his depth against AJ?

Didn't we think that when he was up against WK?

Is that the best we can hope for the next fight for Joshua?
User avatar
cashead
Posts: 3996
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am

Re: Boxing

Post by cashead »

WaspInWales wrote:Is that the best we can hope for the next fight for Joshua?
Nah, there's NZ's own Joseph Parker.

j/k, Joshua would murder him.
Post Reply