RugbyRebels

She's going to destroy the Tories but it's going to be a tough 2 years with long-lasting damage.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ction-plan

Son of Mathonwy wrote:She's going to destroy the Tories but it's going to be a tough 2 years with long-lasting damage.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ction-plan

Dear god, what a fucking dinosaur. Tax cuts. Any details or justification, no, because tax cuts.

She's a puppet.
An empty suit.
She says what she's told to say.

If she's put on the spot, with no-one in her ear, she'll say what her handlers say - which isn't necessarily what they want her to admit.

This is the downside of what they wanted. They need to keep her away from "thinking" on her feet, at least until they've got her properly trained.

Truss it is.. 80k. vs. 60k.
economic growth it is then..no problem.

I'm actually quite worried that she'll leap upon an easy, populist policy, like freezing the energy price cap funded solely by borrowing, get a massive popularity boost by being the face of change that saved the average Briton (amplified by the Mail and Sun), and then saunter through a spring 2023 election to give us 5 more years of enriching the shareholders at the expense of the country,

Puja

Puja wrote:I'm actually quite worried that she'll leap upon an easy, populist policy, like freezing the energy price cap funded solely by borrowing, get a massive popularity boost by being the face of change that saved the average Briton (amplified by the Mail and Sun), and then saunter through a spring 2023 election to give us 5 more years of enriching the shareholders at the expense of the country,

Puja

Entirely possible; if she can demonstrate a fix for that she will get a lot of support.

Puja wrote:I'm actually quite worried that she'll leap upon an easy, populist policy, like freezing the energy price cap funded solely by borrowing, get a massive popularity boost by being the face of change that saved the average Briton (amplified by the Mail and Sun), and then saunter through a spring 2023 election to give us 5 more years of enriching the shareholders at the expense of the country,

Puja

sounds like she's going to adopt the Energy companies suggestion of loaning them money in order to cap prices. None of the solutions are great in fairness.

The French press already referring to her as "The Iron Weathervane" which I do enjoy.

Puja

Banquo wrote:

Puja wrote:I'm actually quite worried that she'll leap upon an easy, populist policy, like freezing the energy price cap funded solely by borrowing, get a massive popularity boost by being the face of change that saved the average Briton (amplified by the Mail and Sun), and then saunter through a spring 2023 election to give us 5 more years of enriching the shareholders at the expense of the country,

Puja

sounds like she's going to adopt the Energy companies suggestion of loaning them money in order to cap prices. None of the solutions are great in fairness.

That’s probably the quickest solution to this mess.

Did anyone watch? did he actually answer? or was it a genuine IT glitch?

Which Tyler wrote:Did anyone watch? did he actually answer? or was it a genuine IT glitch?

Did he bollox

Sandydragon wrote:Did he bollox

Watching again, you can see him nod at the end of the set-up to the question, acknowledging that he'd heard and understood. You can see him nod again when Charlie starts up after pausing for him - so he could definitely hear the question.

I didn't have much hope that he'd actually answer, but wanted to give the benefit of the doubt, given that I haven't seen beyond the point that video cuts out.

Which Tyler wrote:

Sandydragon wrote:Did he bollox

Watching again, you can see him nod at the end of the set-up to the question, acknowledging that he'd heard and understood. You can see him nod again when Charlie starts up after pausing for him - so he could definitely hear the question.

I didn't have much hope that he'd actually answer, but wanted to give the benefit of the doubt, given that I haven't seen beyond the point that video cuts out.

I was watching it this morning and whilst he did eventually speak, he didn't answer the question.

Not that any of them really do, but very evasive all the same.

Which Tyler wrote:Did anyone watch? did he actually answer? or was it a genuine IT glitch?

Wow. That is full on "If I don't move, then can't see me," levels of freezing up.

Puja

Puja wrote:

Which Tyler wrote:Did anyone watch? did he actually answer? or was it a genuine IT glitch?

Wow. That is full on "If I don't move, then can't see me," levels of freezing up.

Puja

I do that on Teams calls sometimes.

Sandydragon wrote:

Puja wrote:

Which Tyler wrote:Did anyone watch? did he actually answer? or was it a genuine IT glitch?

Wow. That is full on "If I don't move, then can't see me," levels of freezing up.

Puja

I do that on Teams calls sometimes.

Puja wrote:

Which Tyler wrote:Did anyone watch? did he actually answer? or was it a genuine IT glitch?

Wow. That is full on "If I don't move, then can't see me," levels of freezing up.

Puja

Never thought I'd see anyone try Drax's invisibility trick in real life, let alone on live TV.

This is presumably why we need more bonuses for bankers - how will they ever cope with the cost of living crisis and bans on Russian imports - have you seen the cost of caviar recently? Not to mention the nothing-to-do-with-brexit increase in the cost of Bollinger.

Liz Trust is about to go full Trickle Down in front of the UN. What a cynical cunt. Red card bitch, red card.

https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/20/2/539/6500315

morepork wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:02 am Liz Trust is about to go full Trickle Down in front of the UN. What a cynical cunt. Red card bitch, red card.

https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/20/2/539/6500315

While the person she's currently trying to beg an audience with is either finding some morals or has had his twitter account hacked.

https://mobile.twitter.com/POTUS/status ... gr%5Etweet

Puja