Page 196 of 308

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 8:20 am
by Son of Mathonwy
Mikey Brown wrote:
Coco wrote:MAGA 2020
Is that a joke?
Because MAGA 2016 has been such a resounding success.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 10:42 am
by Which Tyler
Son of Mathonwy wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:
Coco wrote:MAGA 2020
Is that a joke?
Because MAGA 2016 has been such a resounding success.
The swamp has been well and truly drained?

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 10:54 am
by WaspInWales
Promises made, promises kept.

Swamp drained.
The US economy has never looked better. Everyone is either a millionaire or thereabouts.
National debt has all but been wiped out.
Russia doesnt interfere with our elections. Mr Putin told Trump himself....why would he lie about that?
Taxes sorted for everyone with little consideration for the big corporations.
Environment saved.
North Korea kept in check. They've stopped testing missiles and look forward to having one of the most prosperous economies in the world and Trump and Kim Jong Un have become pen pals.
Allies well and truly put in their place.
Trade wars working out well. China are shitting themselves
No collusion
Fake news
Enemy of the people

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 11:12 am
by Which Tyler
WaspInWales wrote:Promises made, promises kept.

Too busy to play golf
Swamp drained.
No collusion
The US economy has never looked better. Everyone is either a millionaire or thereabouts.
National debt has all but been wiped out.
Hilary in prison
Russia doesnt interfere with our elections. Mr Putin told Trump himself....why would he lie about that?
No collusion
Taxes sorted for everyone with little consideration for the big corporations.
Environment saved.
Wall built
North Korea kept in check. They've stopped testing missiles and look forward to having one of the most prosperous economies in the world and Trump and Kim Jong Un have become pen pals.
No collusion
Allies well and truly put in their place.
Look at that beautiful wall - puts the wall of China to shame - everyone says so
Trade wars working out well. China are shitting themselves
No collusion
Fake news
Enemy of the people
No collusion
FTFY

Re: RE: Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 11:13 am
by WaspInWales
Which Tyler wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:Promises made, promises kept.

Swamp drained.
No collusion
The US economy has never looked better. Everyone is either a millionaire or thereabouts.
National debt has all but been wiped out.
Hilary in prison
Russia doesnt interfere with our elections. Mr Putin told Trump himself....why would he lie about that?
No collusion
Taxes sorted for everyone with little consideration for the big corporations.
Environment saved.
Wall built
North Korea kept in check. They've stopped testing missiles and look forward to having one of the most prosperous economies in the world and Trump and Kim Jong Un have become pen pals.
No collusion
Allies well and truly put in their place.
Look at that beautiful wall - outs the wall of China to shame
Trade wars working out well. China are shitting themselves
No collusion
Fake news
Enemy of the people
No collusion
FTFY
[emoji122][emoji122][emoji122][emoji108][emoji23]

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 11:58 am
by Which Tyler
Which Tyler wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:.
Look at that beautiful wall - puts the wall of China to shame - everyone says so
FTFY
Shit, I've just has an epiphany. This trade war he's manufactured with China... He's just jealous of their wall isn't he?

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 12:43 pm
by morepork
Fuck him and his platoon of red hat wearing ignorant crackers.

FHAHPORHWIC

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 12:45 pm
by Digby
Which Tyler wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:.
Look at that beautiful wall - puts the wall of China to shame - everyone says so
FTFY
Shit, I've just has an epiphany. This trade war he's manufactured with China... He's just jealous of their wall isn't he?
I'd pay good money to see him presented with a world map, a marker pen and a request to draw a line where he thinks the Great Wall is

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 1:52 pm
by Puja
Digby wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
Which Tyler wrote: FTFY
Shit, I've just has an epiphany. This trade war he's manufactured with China... He's just jealous of their wall isn't he?
I'd pay good money to see him presented with a world map, a marker pen and a request to draw a line where he thinks the Great Wall is
He would sign the map. We all know this to be true.

Puja

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 1:58 pm
by Digby
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
Which Tyler wrote: Shit, I've just has an epiphany. This trade war he's manufactured with China... He's just jealous of their wall isn't he?
I'd pay good money to see him presented with a world map, a marker pen and a request to draw a line where he thinks the Great Wall is
He would sign the map. We all know this to be true.

Puja
Across the bit that's China? Or would he opt for perhaps India, or maybe even Australia?

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:18 pm
by Puja
Digby wrote:
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
I'd pay good money to see him presented with a world map, a marker pen and a request to draw a line where he thinks the Great Wall is
He would sign the map. We all know this to be true.

Puja
Across the bit that's China? Or would he opt for perhaps India, or maybe even Australia?
It would just be where the pen happened to land first. I wouldn't guarantee that he'd even be able to recognise it as a representation of the planet.

Puja

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:33 pm
by Digby
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
Puja wrote:
He would sign the map. We all know this to be true.

Puja
Across the bit that's China? Or would he opt for perhaps India, or maybe even Australia?
It would just be where the pen happened to land first. I wouldn't guarantee that he'd even be able to recognise it as a representation of the planet.

Puja

Tbf whilst I've got some idea where I'd start to draw the wall on China's east coast, I'm not quite sure how closely it runs to the border, nor quite how far through the country it runs beyond it goes a long way

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:47 pm
by Which Tyler
Digby wrote:
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
Across the bit that's China? Or would he opt for perhaps India, or maybe even Australia?
It would just be where the pen happened to land first. I wouldn't guarantee that he'd even be able to recognise it as a representation of the planet.

Puja

Tbf whilst I've got some idea where I'd start to draw the wall on China's east coast, I'm not quite sure how closely it runs to the border, nor quite how far through the country it runs it goes a long way
start in North China and essentially scribble. It's more a lot of walls, rather than a wall...
I think

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:49 pm
by Digby
Which Tyler wrote:
Digby wrote:
Puja wrote:
It would just be where the pen happened to land first. I wouldn't guarantee that he'd even be able to recognise it as a representation of the planet.

Puja

Tbf whilst I've got some idea where I'd start to draw the wall on China's east coast, I'm not quite sure how closely it runs to the border, nor quite how far through the country it runs it goes a long way
start in North China and essentially scribble. It's more a lot of walls, rather than a wall...
I think
Fine, nonetheless if presented with my own challenge I'd be drawing one line that sort of follows the border more than half way across the country but I'm not quite sure how far, nor where it loops, nor...

Re: Trump

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:37 am
by Stones of granite
Digby wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
Digby wrote:

Tbf whilst I've got some idea where I'd start to draw the wall on China's east coast, I'm not quite sure how closely it runs to the border, nor quite how far through the country it runs it goes a long way
start in North China and essentially scribble. It's more a lot of walls, rather than a wall...
I think
Fine, nonetheless if presented with my own challenge I'd be drawing one line that sort of follows the border more than half way across the country but I'm not quite sure how far, nor where it loops, nor...
It doesn’t matter, all you need to remember is that it was bigly successful and there are vanishingly few Mexicans in China.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2019 7:04 am
by Digby
Stones of granite wrote:
Digby wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:start in North China and essentially scribble. It's more a lot of walls, rather than a wall...
I think
Fine, nonetheless if presented with my own challenge I'd be drawing one line that sort of follows the border more than half way across the country but I'm not quite sure how far, nor where it loops, nor...
It doesn’t matter, all you need to remember is that it was bigly successful and there are vanishingly few Mexicans in China.
I do recall the video celebrating it was okay to have America first but could they please have Holland 2nd, and the Dutch had built a great ocean wall to keep out the Mexicans

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:28 am
by Coco
morepork wrote:Fuck him and his platoon of red hat wearing ignorant crackers.

FHAHPORHWIC

Come on... insult us without using racial slurs... you can do better... thats weak Porky.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:45 am
by morepork
Please....

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 6:36 am
by cashead
You support a government that rips children away from their parents, has caused literal children to die in literal fucking concentration camps, and has withheld hygiene products from children. But hey, "he called me a cracker." Get fucked.

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 6:37 am
by cashead
Ignorant red hat wearing murderers of children. Is that better?

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 9:40 am
by Digby
cashead wrote:You support a government that rips children away from their parents, has caused literal children to die in literal fucking concentration camps, and has withheld hygiene products from children. But hey, "he called me a cracker." Get fucked.
You keep using this word literal, I don't think it means what you think it means

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 10:39 am
by Puja
Digby wrote:
cashead wrote:You support a government that rips children away from their parents, has caused literal children to die in literal fucking concentration camps, and has withheld hygiene products from children. But hey, "he called me a cracker." Get fucked.
You keep using this word literal, I don't think it means what you think it means
What's wrong with the use of it there?

Puja

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 10:51 am
by cashead
Digby wrote:
cashead wrote:You support a government that rips children away from their parents, has caused literal children to die in literal fucking concentration camps, and has withheld hygiene products from children. But hey, "he called me a cracker." Get fucked.
You keep using this word literal, I don't think it means what you think it means
Oh do go on.

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 11:07 am
by Digby
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
cashead wrote:You support a government that rips children away from their parents, has caused literal children to die in literal fucking concentration camps, and has withheld hygiene products from children. But hey, "he called me a cracker." Get fucked.
You keep using this word literal, I don't think it means what you think it means
What's wrong with the use of it there?

Puja
I'm going out on a limb to suggest the purpose of the camps isn't to concentrate on fucking

Also why literal children? Are there children who we wouldn't deem literal?

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 11:44 am
by Puja
Digby wrote:
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
You keep using this word literal, I don't think it means what you think it means
What's wrong with the use of it there?

Puja
I'm going out on a limb to suggest the purpose of the camps isn't to concentrate on fucking

Also why literal children? Are there children who we wouldn't deem literal?
That is a new high in pedantry, considering that it's obvious to even a casual observer that literal modifies concentration camp and fucking is an intensifier rather than a verb. And while you are technically correct that all children are literally children, the effect here is to expressly confirm that the use of the word children isn't hyperbole but referring to genuine minors. These are perfectly valid uses of the English language that might be difficult for a software program to parse, but not for a native speaker of the language with half a brain.

Puja