v AB'S - Second Test
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
- morepork
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
It is quite amazing how many pundits state Sexytown and Owen Farook as their preferred 10-12 combo. Are they obliged to do so under pain of death or something?
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Hhmmm, if only there had been someone available to Gatland who could do that. Perhaps even someone who had experience of playing with Faz.switchskier wrote:
It's the 10-12 axis that will generate the debate. Could it work as a partnership, certainly. I'm far less sure that it will however. someone needs to pass flatter and hit more runners at pace before getting the ball a bit wider and bringing in the back three to the game more. Both players have the skillset to do it but it's asking a lot of the backrow to compete with the ABs at the breakdown and then provide that option. I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).
Nowell to
Completely unrelated, but who do people feel about Bigger as an attacking fly half?
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
That's only gonna work if hes looping to the left as the Sunshine Variety Kid struggles off his left hand...morepork wrote:Sexton could do that loop around thing and catch the ABs completely off guard.
- morepork
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Doorzetbornandbred wrote:That's only gonna work if hes looping to the left as the Sunshine Variety Kid struggles off his left hand...morepork wrote:Sexton could do that loop around thing and catch the ABs completely off guard.
I see some nasty hospital passes on the horizon.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Usually the uk press like the underdog. But the uk rugby correspondents are mostly morons.morepork wrote:It is quite amazing how many pundits state Sexytown and Owen Farook as their preferred 10-12 combo. Are they obliged to do so under pain of death or something?
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
That combo was being talked up ore tour, so I suppose now it's being used they have to continue their support. The lack of inside centre options was a big part of that.morepork wrote:It is quite amazing how many pundits state Sexytown and Owen Farook as their preferred 10-12 combo. Are they obliged to do so under pain of death or something?
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I think he has played well. If he can bring that form and approach back to Wales it will be good for us and him. He still isn't the natural attacker of Priestland in form, but he has shown more to his game than just dropping deep and kicking/ defending.bitts wrote:Hhmmm, if only there had been someone available to Gatland who could do that. Perhaps even someone who had experience of playing with Faz.switchskier wrote:
It's the 10-12 axis that will generate the debate. Could it work as a partnership, certainly. I'm far less sure that it will however. someone needs to pass flatter and hit more runners at pace before getting the ball a bit wider and bringing in the back three to the game more. Both players have the skillset to do it but it's asking a lot of the backrow to compete with the ABs at the breakdown and then provide that option. I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).
Nowell to
Completely unrelated, but who do people feel about Bigger as an attacking fly half?
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
as interesting as T'eo having made the most clean breaks, defenders beaten and off loads to date on this tour. Plus his subtle block on SBW to give Williams the space for 'that' try don't figure in ESPN stats.oldbackrow wrote:Those are interesting, where are they from?Timbo wrote: 9 carries for 14 metres, 0 defenders beaten, 0 line breaks...
All in all T'eo has done and shown enough to have retained his spot.
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
My, badly made, point was more that if you are ever planning to have Faz at 12 then you should have taken Ford (or possibly Russell) on tour. Both or genunine attacking threats, which Bigger patently isn't, and offer a useful plan B, which Bigger doesn't.Sandydragon wrote:I think he has played well. If he can bring that form and approach back to Wales it will be good for us and him. He still isn't the natural attacker of Priestland in form, but he has shown more to his game than just dropping deep and kicking/ defending.bitts wrote:Hhmmm, if only there had been someone available to Gatland who could do that. Perhaps even someone who had experience of playing with Faz.switchskier wrote:
It's the 10-12 axis that will generate the debate. Could it work as a partnership, certainly. I'm far less sure that it will however. someone needs to pass flatter and hit more runners at pace before getting the ball a bit wider and bringing in the back three to the game more. Both players have the skillset to do it but it's asking a lot of the backrow to compete with the ABs at the breakdown and then provide that option. I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).
Nowell to
Completely unrelated, but who do people feel about Bigger as an attacking fly half?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Garryowens aren't a mistake if the other side drops the ball, as England have found at in Cardiff and Dublin, but to keep doing it is a lot of work for the chasers and people filling in where the chasers were. More kicking to the corner isn't really an option unless you can bring up the coverage, which will be tricky if the defence is happy to slide off Farrell, actually given the 10 and 12 if they want to kick for the corners one might find it easier to pick Webb over Murray to at least give the inside defence some pause for thought before focusing on JDswitchskier wrote: I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
the scene is set for Owen 'Flashing Blade' Farrell to scythe through the kiwis...Digby wrote:Garryowens aren't a mistake if the other side drops the ball, as England have found at in Cardiff and Dublin, but to keep doing it is a lot of work for the chasers and people filling in where the chasers were. More kicking to the corner isn't really an option unless you can bring up the coverage, which will be tricky if the defence is happy to slide off Farrell, actually given the 10 and 12 if they want to kick for the corners one might find it easier to pick Webb over Murray to at least give the inside defence some pause for thought before focusing on JDswitchskier wrote: I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).

- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Banquo wrote:the scene is set for Owen 'Flashing Blade' Farrell to scythe through the kiwis...Digby wrote:Garryowens aren't a mistake if the other side drops the ball, as England have found at in Cardiff and Dublin, but to keep doing it is a lot of work for the chasers and people filling in where the chasers were. More kicking to the corner isn't really an option unless you can bring up the coverage, which will be tricky if the defence is happy to slide off Farrell, actually given the 10 and 12 if they want to kick for the corners one might find it easier to pick Webb over Murray to at least give the inside defence some pause for thought before focusing on JDswitchskier wrote: I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).
How many do we all think the Lions will win by? 21-35 points?
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Paddyglendower has them at +33skidger wrote:Banquo wrote:the scene is set for Owen 'Flashing Blade' Farrell to scythe through the kiwis...Digby wrote:
Garryowens aren't a mistake if the other side drops the ball, as England have found at in Cardiff and Dublin, but to keep doing it is a lot of work for the chasers and people filling in where the chasers were. More kicking to the corner isn't really an option unless you can bring up the coverage, which will be tricky if the defence is happy to slide off Farrell, actually given the 10 and 12 if they want to kick for the corners one might find it easier to pick Webb over Murray to at least give the inside defence some pause for thought before focusing on JD
How many do we all think the Lions will win by? 21-35 points?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
If he ever grew his hair a little people watching him play would confuse him with David DuckhamBanquo wrote:the scene is set for Owen 'Flashing Blade' Farrell to scythe through the kiwis...Digby wrote:Garryowens aren't a mistake if the other side drops the ball, as England have found at in Cardiff and Dublin, but to keep doing it is a lot of work for the chasers and people filling in where the chasers were. More kicking to the corner isn't really an option unless you can bring up the coverage, which will be tricky if the defence is happy to slide off Farrell, actually given the 10 and 12 if they want to kick for the corners one might find it easier to pick Webb over Murray to at least give the inside defence some pause for thought before focusing on JDswitchskier wrote: I suspect that what we'll see is much more tactical kicking to the corners and more garrryowens (a mistake).
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
No arguments there.p/d wrote:as interesting as T'eo having made the most clean breaks, defenders beaten and off loads to date on this tour. Plus his subtle block on SBW to give Williams the space for 'that' try don't figure in ESPN stats.oldbackrow wrote:Those are interesting, where are they from?Timbo wrote: 9 carries for 14 metres, 0 defenders beaten, 0 line breaks...
All in all T'eo has done and shown enough to have retained his spot.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Fair enough. I get your point, although I think Biggar was only ever intended to be a dirt tracker, barring an injury. Im not entirely sure that Gatland ever wanted to play Faz and Sexton together - this feels more like a hit and hope selection than a genuine strategy.bitts wrote:My, badly made, point was more that if you are ever planning to have Faz at 12 then you should have taken Ford (or possibly Russell) on tour. Both or genunine attacking threats, which Bigger patently isn't, and offer a useful plan B, which Bigger doesn't.Sandydragon wrote:I think he has played well. If he can bring that form and approach back to Wales it will be good for us and him. He still isn't the natural attacker of Priestland in form, but he has shown more to his game than just dropping deep and kicking/ defending.bitts wrote:
Hhmmm, if only there had been someone available to Gatland who could do that. Perhaps even someone who had experience of playing with Faz.
Completely unrelated, but who do people feel about Bigger as an attacking fly half?
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I must be one of the few (sais) who see beyond his diving and moaning and actually rate Biggar as a player, very good skill set. Bet he could play flat pretty well if allowed to.Sandydragon wrote:Fair enough. I get your point, although I think Biggar was only ever intended to be a dirt tracker, barring an injury. Im not entirely sure that Gatland ever wanted to play Faz and Sexton together - this feels more like a hit and hope selection than a genuine strategy.bitts wrote:My, badly made, point was more that if you are ever planning to have Faz at 12 then you should have taken Ford (or possibly Russell) on tour. Both or genunine attacking threats, which Bigger patently isn't, and offer a useful plan B, which Bigger doesn't.Sandydragon wrote: I think he has played well. If he can bring that form and approach back to Wales it will be good for us and him. He still isn't the natural attacker of Priestland in form, but he has shown more to his game than just dropping deep and kicking/ defending.
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I mean he was very good for quite a patch a couple of seasons back (I think) but he seems like one who's fallback state, when it's not really clicking, is to sit back or just hoist up & unders. Maybe he's just been following Gatland's orders too long.
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
been good this tour, I've thought.Mikey Brown wrote:I mean he was very good for quite a patch a couple of seasons back (I think) but he seems like one who's fallback state, when it's not really clicking, is to sit back or just hoist up & unders. Maybe he's just been following Gatland's orders too long.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I think he has had a very good tour. Despite being written off as the 3rd fly half, he has played well and I'm not convinced that there is a huge difference in standard between him and the 2 test fly halves.Banquo wrote:been good this tour, I've thought.Mikey Brown wrote:I mean he was very good for quite a patch a couple of seasons back (I think) but he seems like one who's fallback state, when it's not really clicking, is to sit back or just hoist up & unders. Maybe he's just been following Gatland's orders too long.
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
It's certainly been a lot closer than you'd have thought given Owen "the best player in Europe" Farrell is there. There are very few players on tour who've looked near to their best. Faletau in particular has been absolutely monstrous since his return from injury. What are they doing to these guys in training?
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Part must be because they are both unfamiliar with each other and that they are actually playing good teams who challenge in a different way to what they are used to. And they were shagged out before they got there. Etc...Mikey Brown wrote:It's certainly been a lot closer than you'd have thought given Owen "the best player in Europe" Farrell is there. There are very few players on tour who've looked near to their best. Faletau in particular has been absolutely monstrous since his return from injury. What are they doing to these guys in training?
- Numbers
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Not many people in Wales rate his attacking prowess.Banquo wrote:I must be one of the few (sais) who see beyond his diving and moaning and actually rate Biggar as a player, very good skill set. Bet he could play flat pretty well if allowed to.Sandydragon wrote:Fair enough. I get your point, although I think Biggar was only ever intended to be a dirt tracker, barring an injury. Im not entirely sure that Gatland ever wanted to play Faz and Sexton together - this feels more like a hit and hope selection than a genuine strategy.bitts wrote:
My, badly made, point was more that if you are ever planning to have Faz at 12 then you should have taken Ford (or possibly Russell) on tour. Both or genunine attacking threats, which Bigger patently isn't, and offer a useful plan B, which Bigger doesn't.
Russell should have been selected for this tour.
- jngf
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
Losing Moriarty as a genuine carrying 6 has been a big blow for the Lions , I would have thought SOB was the next best candidate to carry out this role at 6 and use Tips at 7 to play the extra threequarter linkman role? Also how come George North hasn't edged it past either Watson or Daly?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - Second Test
I think Moriarty was a bigger loss for his dominant tackles simply looking at the 1st test than for his carrying. And George North has been ruled out of the tour with injury, and as a consequence has fallen a long way behind Watson and Daly rather than looking to edge past them