RugbyRebels

Oakboy wrote:

morepork wrote:

Oakboy wrote:
So (just asking), in that case, does so-called 'equal opportunity' not mean that a woman (who is not as good a player as a man) is/will be entitled to equal opportunity of publicity/earning etc. just because she is a woman?

Or, is the current women's game (as currently defined) capable of competing on equal terms for spectacle and earnings power?

Where does supply and demand really begin and end? When is it unfair/positive discrimination?

Again, I simply don't know what to think.

What a strange way to frame the question. Defining women as "not as good as men".

I find everything about the subject strange so feel free to explain.

morepork wrote:

Oakboy wrote:

morepork wrote:
What a strange way to frame the question. Defining women as "not as good as men".

I find everything about the subject strange so feel free to explain.

Mansplain?