Farrell you C++T

Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod

Danno
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Farrell you C++T

Post by Danno »

Sandydragon wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 2:40 pm
Danno wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 2:14 pm
Banquo wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 11:02 am also, I blame the WMB for sorting of defending a player I've been moaning about for 13 years. Ba5tards.
Feeling your pain right now
Consider it belated payback for Gavin Henson.
Haha, fair enough.
pjm1
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:22 am

Re: Farrell you C++T

Post by pjm1 »

paddy no 11 wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:55 pm
Danno wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:52 pm
Numbers wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 11:15 am

That's a bit of a contradiction there mate.
Not really. It's shit technique but it's not malicious. But I suspect we aren't going to agree
So, after x number of iterations of said technique, you go from incompetent to being a......

X is variable for us all
Really incompetent fool who should know better?

I should know by now that I can’t plaster. But I still keep trying as it might be “good enough this time”.

It doesn’t make me a malicious plasterer though :D
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6541
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Farrell you C++T

Post by Oakboy »

bruce wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 12:09 pm
Banquo wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 11:51 am
bruce wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 11:19 am

It was you lot that brought Junior into this. The OP was to do with pops.
Nope blaming you personally!
I'm happy for England to bring him back into the fold. You were starting to look alright in the 6Ns, you were obviously missing his test match animal status and limited skillset.
Don't you dare forward that to Borthwick!! :(
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10646
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Farrell you C++T

Post by Sandydragon »

Oakboy wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 3:38 pm
bruce wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 12:09 pm
Banquo wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 11:51 am

Nope blaming you personally!
I'm happy for England to bring him back into the fold. You were starting to look alright in the 6Ns, you were obviously missing his test match animal status and limited skillset.
Don't you dare forward that to Borthwick!! :(
If he gets anywhere near the test team, we wont need to. The commetariat will spaff themselves into a state of nirvana with articles on how we won the remaining tests. Poor old Borthwick wont be able to open. paper without someone suggesting Farrell should be picked again.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6541
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Farrell you C++T

Post by Oakboy »

Sandydragon wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 3:56 pm
Oakboy wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 3:38 pm
bruce wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 12:09 pm
I'm happy for England to bring him back into the fold. You were starting to look alright in the 6Ns, you were obviously missing his test match animal status and limited skillset.
Don't you dare forward that to Borthwick!! :(
If he gets anywhere near the test team, we wont need to. The commetariat will spaff themselves into a state of nirvana with articles on how we won the remaining tests. Poor old Borthwick wont be able to open. paper without someone suggesting Farrell should be picked again.
It is beyond my simple mind how anyone would willingly set the team back by so doing. Can we be that stupid? Don't answer that.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17996
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Farrell you C++T

Post by Puja »

pjm1 wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 2:56 pm
paddy no 11 wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:55 pm
Danno wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:52 pm

Not really. It's shit technique but it's not malicious. But I suspect we aren't going to agree
So, after x number of iterations of said technique, you go from incompetent to being a......

X is variable for us all
Really incompetent fool who should know better?

I should know by now that I can’t plaster. But I still keep trying as it might be “good enough this time”.

It doesn’t make me a malicious plasterer though :D
Understandable attitude if, after every time you do it badly, the plastering experts declare that, despite the evidence of your eyes, you've actually done an acceptable job and thus don't need any punishment.

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply