More on Syria

Post Reply
User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1946
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: More on Syria

Post by Zhivago »

Digby wrote:
kk67 wrote:
Digby wrote:
I'm proud to be English too, and I tolerate having a Welsh mother
Proud to be English..?. About what..?.
Are you proud about England's contribution to Afghanistan..?.

You know that England at Agincourt utterly revoked all rules of chivalric honour by murdering unarmed prisoners.
It wasn't the first time and it wasn't the last.
Like all English folk I derive most of my self worth from our participation in Afghanistan and Agincourt, it's just not evil if it's not alliterative
You fucker, everyone knows it was the Welsh archers who won Agincourt.

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

Digby wrote:
kk67 wrote:
Digby wrote:
I'm proud to be English too, and I tolerate having a Welsh mother
Proud to be English..?. About what..?.
Are you proud about England's contribution to Afghanistan..?.

You know that England at Agincourt utterly revoked all rules of chivalric honour by murdering unarmed prisoners.
It wasn't the first time and it wasn't the last.
Like all English folk I derive most of my self worth from our participation in Afghanistan and Agincourt, it's just not evil if it's not alliterative
You're being led by a tragic bunch of self interested stooges. It's painfully clear they are deeply divisive and not just separatist elitist morons.
They are that too.
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by canta_brian »

kk67 wrote:We all know that Syria itself isn't the issue.
No one fights over a bit of desert for humanitarian reasons. Certainly not the Yanks or the English.
And not the Russians either. Don't turn yourself into Rowan mark 2, where anything anti western is automatically good and pure.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

canta_brian wrote:
kk67 wrote:We all know that Syria itself isn't the issue.
No one fights over a bit of desert for humanitarian reasons. Certainly not the Yanks or the English.
And not the Russians either. Don't turn yourself into Rowan mark 2, where anything anti western is automatically good and pure.
Nor a brainwashed clown like Can't (have) a_brain, who thinks that anything non-Western is evil and sinister, and that anyone who suggests otherwise is obviously crazy :roll:

Yes, it's that time again, folks. When the arguments have all been shot down in flames, out come the ad hominems . . . :evil:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by morepork »

rowan wrote:
canta_brian wrote:
kk67 wrote:We all know that Syria itself isn't the issue.
No one fights over a bit of desert for humanitarian reasons. Certainly not the Yanks or the English.
And not the Russians either. Don't turn yourself into Rowan mark 2, where anything anti western is automatically good and pure.
Nor a brainwashed clown like Can't (have) a_brain, who thinks that anything non-Western is evil and sinister, and that anyone who suggests otherwise is obviously crazy :roll:

Yes, it's that time again, folks. When the arguments have all been shot down in flames, out come the ad hominems . . . :evil:

He has made no such claim. You are the gull here.
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

Digby wrote: it's just not evil if it's not alliterative
Quality. I'm using that.
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

canta_brian wrote:
kk67 wrote:We all know that Syria itself isn't the issue.
No one fights over a bit of desert for humanitarian reasons. Certainly not the Yanks or the English.
And not the Russians either. Don't turn yourself into Rowan mark 2, where anything anti western is automatically good and pure.
Of course.
But watching the early morning reports of the air strikes got me thinking about that scene in The Hunt for Red October when Baldwin has jumped out of the chopper and scrambled aboard the aircraft carrier. He's chatting with the Admiral and the Skipper and the admiral says:
'Son... the Rooskis don't take a dump without a plan'.

I'd adapt that to : 'Son...the US don't launch ordinance without there being a profit'.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

morepork wrote:
rowan wrote:
canta_brian wrote:And not the Russians either. Don't turn yourself into Rowan mark 2, where anything anti western is automatically good and pure.
Nor a brainwashed clown like Can't (have) a_brain, who thinks that anything non-Western is evil and sinister, and that anyone who suggests otherwise is obviously crazy :roll:

Yes, it's that time again, folks. When the arguments have all been shot down in flames, out come the ad hominems . . . :evil:

He has made no such claim. You are the gull here.
Nor have I - and you know it.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by morepork »

Don't be obtuse man.
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

morepork wrote:Don't be obtuse man.
For feck sake, MP. Stop being so slow to understand!

You will receive nothing but opprobrium from Rowan if you carry on using words like obtuse.
Idle Feck
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

Ah, yes, the feces-flinging chimpanzee phase of the degeneration process is always intriguing to observe, if only out of a morbid sense of curiosity . . . :geek: :o :lol:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Donny osmond
Posts: 3161
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by Donny osmond »

Jeez I’m away for a week and look what this has descended into. It really was all about me. Me me me.

Should I join the resistance now?
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by canta_brian »

rowan wrote:Ah, yes, the feces-flinging chimpanzee phase of the degeneration process is always intriguing to observe, if only out of a morbid sense of curiosity . . . :geek: :o [emoji38]
Observe?

You utter hypocrite.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

canta_brian wrote:
rowan wrote:Ah, yes, the feces-flinging chimpanzee phase of the degeneration process is always intriguing to observe, if only out of a morbid sense of curiosity . . . :geek: :o [emoji38]
Observe?

You utter hypocrite.
Case in point :geek:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by canta_brian »

rowan wrote:
canta_brian wrote:
rowan wrote:Ah, yes, the feces-flinging chimpanzee phase of the degeneration process is always intriguing to observe, if only out of a morbid sense of curiosity . . . :geek: :o [emoji38]
Observe?

You utter hypocrite.
Case in point :geek:
Correct. But my point not yours.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

Our glorious leader is ecstatic today, joining the Saudis and Israelis in gleeful celebration . . .

In a clear violation of international law, these three bloodthirsty partners in crime bombed Syria hours before the OPCW arrived in Douma to investigate an alleged chemical attack

Image
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: More on Syria

Post by Digby »

A very limited response so far from USA, UK and France. Clearly inviting Russia, Iran and Syria not to respond in turn leaving the attack as over, and clearly leaving plenty of options to return with more strikes in the face of an unwanted response
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

Digby wrote:A very limited response so far from USA, UK and France. Clearly inviting Russia, Iran and Syria not to respond in turn leaving the attack as over, and clearly leaving plenty of options to return with more strikes in the face of an unwanted response
Looks like they're trying to prove a point, save face and possibly destroy the evidence - or lack of. It's all totally in violation of international law, of course, and if any civilians at all are killed they should be held accountable (but won't be, as usual). No doubt these strikes will also enhance the image and popularity of the embattled leaders responsible.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

Digby wrote:A very limited response so far from USA, UK and France. Clearly inviting Russia, Iran and Syria not to respond in turn leaving the attack as over, and clearly leaving plenty of options to return with more strikes in the face of an unwanted response
Yeah. Our foreign policy does seem to be made material by a few Playstation bombs.
Should we award some medals...?
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: RE: Re: More on Syria

Post by canta_brian »

rowan wrote:
Digby wrote:A very limited response so far from USA, UK and France. Clearly inviting Russia, Iran and Syria not to respond in turn leaving the attack as over, and clearly leaving plenty of options to return with more strikes in the face of an unwanted response
Looks like they're trying to prove a point, save face and possibly destroy the evidence - or lack of. It's all totally in violation of international law, of course, and if any civilians at all are killed they should be held accountable (but won't be, as usual). No doubt these strikes will also enhance the image and popularity of the embattled leaders responsible.
Destroy evidence of chemical attack in Douma by targeting areas in Homs and Central Damascus? Are you sure you are not thinking of Odessa, or maybe Dargaville?
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

God knows they love a medal.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

Jonathan Cook is an award-winning British journalist & author based in Nazareth, Israel, since 2001:

1. The United States, the UK and France launched air strikes on Syria this morning just as inspectors from the UN chemical weapons agency, the OPCW, had arrived to investigate whether a chemical weapons attack – the official justfication for the strikes – had taken place in Douma last week and, if so, who was responsible.

It looks suspiciously like the strikes were timed to pre-empt, and foil, the UN investigation. That has to raise concerns that we are being hoodwinked by our leaders, as we were in Iraq and Libya, as they seek to actively stoke yet another “humanitarian war” whose only beneficiaries will be the west’s military-industrial-security-media elites.

2. Let us not forget, a military attack on a sovereign country without authorisation from the UN Security Council amounts to a war of aggression. That is a crime against humanity – the supreme international crime, in fact – as jurists have repeatedly pointed out.

We have now so inverted the global order that western powers can claim – with a straight face – to attack a country in the name of decency and humanitarianism by breaking the most fundamental tenets of international law, tenets that were developed precisely to prevent last century’s two world wars that laid waste to Europe and beyond.

3. Trump has said: “We are prepared to sustain this response until the Syrian regime stops its use of prohibited chemical agents.” Given that he doesn’t know whether Bashar Assad used chemical weapons, or whether Assad’s jihadist opponents in Douma have access to such agents, his statements can only give Islamic extremists of the headchopping variety a huge incentive to carry out (more?) false-flag attacks – or simply mock up phoney attacks – to intensify western violence that will work in their favour.

4. There is precisely nothing humanitarian about western military attacks. They encourage and strengthen the losing side, Islamic extremists, and further drag out an already protracted proxy war in which Syrian civilians have been paying the main price.

They also risk triggering an escalation and a widening of the fighting that could lead to massive death and destruction in the region and beyond (and that without contemplating the dangers of a nuclear confrontation). We are now dependent not on the good sense of our leaders (they have shown they have none), but on the restraint of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. We must hope he refuses to be baited by our own irresponsible governments.

5. This is not Trump’s fault, bad as he is. There is bipartisan support for this madness. Hilary Clinton and the Democratic leadership in the US, and much of the parliamentary Labour party in the UK, are fully on board with these actions. In fact, they have been goading Trump into launching attacks.

It is hard not to notice a political context in both the US and the UK in which those opposed to escalating tensions with Russia – including Trump when he was a presidential candidate – have been vilified as Kremlin agents and Putin-bots.

Doubtless Trump’s shady global business dealings are worthy of investigation, as they were before he became president. But it is the relentless focus on his ties to Russia alone, on Russia’s supposed interference in the last US elections, on Russia’s supposed role in generating so-called “fake news” on social media, on the assumption of Russian involvement in the poisoning of the Skripals in the UK, and much else, that provides Trump with little choice but to go along with the US security and intelligence establishments.

That is the reason why he is instantly feted by the policy establishment every time he attacks Syria. It will take a brave Trump to resist these pressures in the future – and little so far suggests that he possesses that kind of courage.


https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2018 ... nst-syria/
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

The target has always been regime change.
The US don't understand that civilian causalities are a factor in their material gain.
They consider them as 'natives' that are stuck in the 16th century...... and the feckwit yanks don't understand 'life' as a concept beyond their own stupid bollocks justifications.


Feckwit Yanks who've never travelled.
Last edited by kk67 on Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: More on Syria

Post by rowan »

rowan wrote:Our glorious leader is ecstatic today, joining the Saudis and Israelis in gleeful celebration . . .
Forget to mention ISIS. The head-choppers will be performing the happy dance of celebration today as their American, British and French allies bomb yet another Middle Eastern nation in violation of international law.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: More on Syria

Post by kk67 »

It's upsetting that the West has deliberately encouraged and funded an autocratic, feudal society that loves a bit of slavery.
Directly opposed to the feudal society we decapitated a few hundred years ago.

And now our rich kids are exploiting their comfort. Bless them for hiding in a desert.
Post Reply