RugbyRebels

morepork wrote:Full circle Space Madness.

PC gone wild. Show us yer tits/kok.

I would but I had to sprinkle them in sugar and stick one in Rowan's mouth. He is almost done sobbing.

Coco wrote:

rowan wrote:No, I am pointing out that it is you who is the sexist by demanding double standards and exploiting the gender issue in an attempt to discredit those who do not think as you do. You're a hypocrite who does not understand feminism, clearly believes her gender endows her with moral superiority, and shamelessly abuses the issue.

Examples.. ? Did I emasculate you?

I've already given you the examples. Did that defeminize you?

rowan wrote:

Coco wrote:

rowan wrote:No, I am pointing out that it is you who is the sexist by demanding double standards and exploiting the gender issue in an attempt to discredit those who do not think as you do. You're a hypocrite who does not understand feminism, clearly believes her gender endows her with moral superiority, and shamelessly abuses the issue.

Examples.. ? Did I emasculate you?

I've already given you the examples. Did that defeminize you?

Pull my hair next time. I'm a bad bad girl.

I can be on the west coast in about 7 hours....

morepork wrote:I can be on the west coast in about 7 hours....

I'll be at the airport to pick you up... I'll be the one in the baseball cap that says "Grab'em by the p****"

rowan wrote:No, I am pointing out that it is you who is the sexist by demanding double standards and exploiting the gender issue in an attempt to discredit those who do not think as you do. You're a hypocrite who does not understand feminism, clearly believes her gender endows her with moral superiority, and shamelessly abuses the issue.

What in the everloving fuck is this MRA bullshit?

cashead wrote:

rowan wrote:No, I am pointing out that it is you who is the sexist by demanding double standards and exploiting the gender issue in an attempt to discredit those who do not think as you do. You're a hypocrite who does not understand feminism, clearly believes her gender endows her with moral superiority, and shamelessly abuses the issue.

What in the everloving fuck is this MRA bullshit?

It's not the first. It won't be the last. Once you understand that's his framework it all starts to be slightly less weird.

Coco wrote:

morepork wrote:I can be on the west coast in about 7 hours....

I'll be at the airport to pick you up... I'll be the one in the baseball cap that says "Grab'em by the p****"

Penis?

Sexist pig.

morepork wrote:

Coco wrote:

morepork wrote:I can be on the west coast in about 7 hours....

I'll be at the airport to pick you up... I'll be the one in the baseball cap that says "Grab'em by the p****"

Penis?

Sexist pig.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

cashead wrote:

rowan wrote:No, I am pointing out that it is you who is the sexist by demanding double standards and exploiting the gender issue in an attempt to discredit those who do not think as you do. You're a hypocrite who does not understand feminism, clearly believes her gender endows her with moral superiority, and shamelessly abuses the issue.

What in the everloving fuck is this MRA bullshit?

It's not the first. It won't be the last. Once you understand that's his framework it all starts to be slightly less weird.

You can play bingo with his posts.

Coco wrote:Please try to remember that you will have to dumb it down for me, as I am a white-middle-class-American-woman that has no grasp on any life experience, or common sense.

Thank you in advance.

I thought you were a cross-dressing Nordo-Vietnamese riveter and part-time Marmite wrestler from Ilkley!!!!

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Coco wrote:Please try to remember that you will have to dumb it down for me, as I am a white-middle-class-American-woman that has no grasp on any life experience, or common sense.

Thank you in advance.

I thought you were a cross-dressing Nordo-Vietnamese riveter and part-time Marmite wrestler from Ilkley!!!!

I used to be, but I am trying to kick that habit.

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Coco wrote:Please try to remember that you will have to dumb it down for me, as I am a white-middle-class-American-woman that has no grasp on any life experience, or common sense.

Thank you in advance.

I thought you were a cross-dressing Nordo-Vietnamese riveter and part-time Marmite wrestler from Ilkley!!!!

Huh?

.. As if clutching a teddy bear would be involved..

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Coco wrote:Please try to remember that you will have to dumb it down for me, as I am a white-middle-class-American-woman that has no grasp on any life experience, or common sense.

Thank you in advance.

I thought you were a cross-dressing Nordo-Vietnamese riveter and part-time Marmite wrestler from Ilkley!!!!

Huh?

Fuck off with this shit.

cashead wrote:Fuck off with this shit.

I agree. Down with this sort of thing!!!

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

cashead wrote:Fuck off with this shit.

I agree. Down with this sort of thing!!!

Hillary and Bill captured in foreplay, immediately before Chelsea's conception?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37805525

Rowan is going to cream himself

I'm not overly concerned with her email scandals. I'm more concerned with the total destruction of Iraq, Libya and Syria, in which she was directly or indirectly complicit, and interminable internal wars that followed, as well as her arms deals with Saudi while they were bombing Yemen, support for Apartheid Israel which periodically massacres Palestinians, and backing for a murderous dictatorship following a coup in the Honduras. I know those millions of human lives mean nothing to some people, but to me it's deeply troubling. That's why I'll be supporting Jill Stein & the Greens on election day.


As always, Pilger is spot on: http://johnpilger.com/articles/inside-t ... nton-trump

Another salient article: Dear Hillary: You Can’t Be a Pro-War Feminist: http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinio ... -0001.html

canta_brian wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37805525

Rowan is going to cream himself

Nope.

Basically, it had little to do with Clinton (basically, it sits somewhere on a scale of "nothing at all" to "absolutely sweet fuck-all") and more to do with Anthony Weiner being a creepy bastard.

rowan wrote:Another salient article: Dear Hillary: You Can’t Be a Pro-War Feminist: http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinio ... -0001.html

Not really. Lots of long bows being drawn there.

Wow, this politician should be going to the Hague, not the White House. No wonder the Africans are starting to pull out of the ICC...

2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election
Unearthed tape: 'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'

http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-audio- ... -election/

cashead wrote:

canta_brian wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37805525

Rowan is going to cream himself

Nope.

Basically, it had little to do with Clinton (basically, it sits somewhere on a scale of "nothing at all" to "absolutely sweet fuck-all") and more to do with Anthony Weiner being a creepy bastard.

How does an email from someone called Weiner get through a spam filter in this day and age?

Looks like James comey might have overplayed his hand on this one. According to his aides the FBI has not even seen any of the emails that has causes him to inform congress that he is reopening the investigation. It is also against protocol to make public the details of an investigation, especially so close to an election.

So lifelong registered republican breaks all the rules to make public that he is investigating the democratic presidential candidate on the basis of some evidence that the FBI has never seen.

Trump could be right that this is the biggest political scandal since watergate, just not in the way he is making out.

canta_brian wrote:

cashead wrote:

canta_brian wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37805525

Rowan is going to cream himself

Nope.

Basically, it had little to do with Clinton (basically, it sits somewhere on a scale of "nothing at all" to "absolutely sweet fuck-all") and more to do with Anthony Weiner being a creepy bastard.

How does an email from someone called Weiner get through a spam filter in this day and age?

Looks like James comey might have overplayed his hand on this one. According to his aides the FBI has not even seen any of the emails that has causes him to inform congress that he is reopening the investigation. It is also against protocol to make public the details of an investigation, especially so close to an election.

So lifelong registered republican breaks all the rules to make public that he is investigating the democratic presidential candidate on the basis of some evidence that the FBI has never seen.

Trump could be right that this is the biggest political scandal since watergate, just not in the way he is making out.

In all likelihood, Comey will probably be shitcanned shortly after the election after screaming his head off about finding emails that are related to Clinton on Huma Abedin's laptop. Like, Abedin works for Clinton and she's the estranged wife of Anthony Weiner. How is this a surprise? And better yet, his investigators don't have a warrant to even look at the emails.

It'll have a temporary disruption in the Clinton campaign, but she'll probably pull ahead soon enough, seeing as how the narrative's turned against Comey, and all it'll do is play into the narrative re: the Republicans - they're a party hijacked by the crazies that used to be on the fringe, defined by partisan hackery and childish obstructionism, of which there is plenty of evidence to support such accusations.

rowan wrote: Another salient article: Dear Hillary: You Can’t Be a Pro-War Feminist: http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinio ... -0001.html

Yup. Good article.