Not a fan of the two-state plan and happy for Israel to continue building settlements at will.
Another champion of the people.
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:29 pm
by cashead
No, but you see, Clinton...
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:44 pm
by Coco
morepork wrote:Is that one from your collection of antique sex toys?
Sigh, do you always have to turn everything sexual? And, yes... Yes it is.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 8:06 am
by Eugene Wrayburn
cashead wrote:No, but you see, Clinton...
Every single thing that she's been accused of, he's worse. She might justifiably be accused of being too close to business - though pretty much all american politicians are - but to think that the solution to that is to elect a billionaire businessman who refuse to release his tax returns is beyond cretinous.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 9:55 am
by Digby
Not sure it's fair to call Trump a businessman, he inherited money, and used bankruptcy to avoid paying for his foul ups, and then used the bankruptcy to avoid making his contribution to society through taxes. There are some decent people in business, Trump isn't one of them.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:49 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
Coco wrote:
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
As if anything these overpaid dancing monkeys said prior to the election made a difference. I thought they were all moving to Canada anyway? Actors. These are the arrogant narcissistic idiots who make a very lucrative living by memorizing and acting out lines written by other people. They take themselves way too serious.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:50 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
cashead wrote:No, but you see, Clinton...
Every single thing that she's been accused of, he's worse. She might justifiably be accused of being too close to business - though pretty much all american politicians are - but to think that the solution to that is to elect a billionaire businessman who refuse to release his tax returns is beyond cretinous.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 5:01 pm
by morepork
He is accompanied by one of his American Psycho children in everything he does, the gurning mutant orange roughy. It's fucking comical. Someone should give them matching white shell suits and they can form a reality TV counter to the nepotism of the Worker's Party of Korea (fuck you Han Blix!). There will be enough material over the next four years to support the career of stand up comedians the world over for a decade.
ivanka-trump-abe.jpg
Shinzo: "Donald, who the fuck is the white girl?"
Orange cockwomble: "That's my daughter"
Shinzo: "What does she do".
Orange cockwomble: "She wears clothes".
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 8:05 pm
by cashead
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
Indeed.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:20 pm
by morepork
Any chance of Katie Hopkins becoming PM then?
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:20 pm
by kk67
morepork wrote:Any chance of Katie Hopkins becoming PM then?
I'd prefer Rufus Hound or Owen Jones.
No sexism involved,......I just don't think Louise Mensch or Katie Hopkins understand what Humanity entails.
Glenda Slagg is supposed to be a caricature.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:29 pm
by Mellsblue
kk67 wrote:
morepork wrote:Any chance of Katie Hopkins becoming PM then?
I'd prefer Rufus Hound or Owen Jones.
No sexism involved,......I just don't think Louise Mensch or Katie Hopkins understand what Humanity entails.
Glenda Slagg is supposed to be a caricature.
Have you heard the theory/rumour that these extreme characters such as Katie Hopkins and Joey Essex are a group of comedians playing an incredibly long practical joke - TV's incarnations of Glenda Slagg. I hope it to be true but, sadly, I doubt it.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:17 am
by Sandydragon
Mellsblue wrote:
kk67 wrote:
morepork wrote:Any chance of Katie Hopkins becoming PM then?
I'd prefer Rufus Hound or Owen Jones.
No sexism involved,......I just don't think Louise Mensch or Katie Hopkins understand what Humanity entails.
Glenda Slagg is supposed to be a caricature.
Have you heard the theory/rumour that these extreme characters such as Katie Hopkins and Joey Essex are a group of comedians playing an incredibly long practical joke - TV's incarnations of Glenda Slagg. I hope it to be true but, sadly, I doubt it.
Unfortunately, whilst some idiots in the gutter press give them the oxygen of publicity, they will continue. It is apparently possible to earn a decent living off no discernible talent other than being famous.
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:50 am
by kk67
Mellsblue wrote:
kk67 wrote:
morepork wrote:Any chance of Katie Hopkins becoming PM then?
I'd prefer Rufus Hound or Owen Jones.
No sexism involved,......I just don't think Louise Mensch or Katie Hopkins understand what Humanity entails.
Glenda Slagg is supposed to be a caricature.
Have you heard the theory/rumour that these extreme characters such as Katie Hopkins and Joey Essex are a group of comedians playing an incredibly long practical joke - TV's incarnations of Glenda Slagg. I hope it to be true but, sadly, I doubt it.
Yeah,...sadly there really are people who are that thick.
Katie is ex-military so her brainwashing was state sponsored and in that respect it's at least understandable.
No offence, Sandy.
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:01 pm
by rowan
& this is why I regarded him as the lesser of 2 evils:
A Pentagon memo outlining the incoming Trump administration’s top “defense priorities” identifies defeating the Islamic State, eliminating budget caps, developing a new cybersecurity strategy, and finding greater efficiencies as the president-elect’s primary concerns. But the memo, obtained by Foreign Policy, does not include any mention of Russia, which has been identified by senior military officials as the No. 1 threat to the United States.
rowan wrote:& this is why I regarded him as the lesser of 2 evils:
A Pentagon memo outlining the incoming Trump administration’s top “defense priorities” identifies defeating the Islamic State, eliminating budget caps, developing a new cybersecurity strategy, and finding greater efficiencies as the president-elect’s primary concerns. But the memo, obtained by Foreign Policy, does not include any mention of Russia, which has been identified by senior military officials as the No. 1 threat to the United States.
Haven't clicked the link but did it mention North Korea? Some of of Trump's new buddies seem convinced that North Korea are the most bigly-est threat to the US at the moment.
Remind me, who is among North Korea's biggest friends on the international stage? Putin by any chance?
I'm sure Trump and co fucking with Kim Jong-un will have no knock-on effects with relationships with Russia.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:02 am
by morepork
rowan wrote:& this is why I regarded him as the lesser of 2 evils:
A Pentagon memo outlining the incoming Trump administration’s top “defense priorities” identifies defeating the Islamic State, eliminating budget caps, developing a new cybersecurity strategy, and finding greater efficiencies as the president-elect’s primary concerns. But the memo, obtained by Foreign Policy, does not include any mention of Russia, which has been identified by senior military officials as the No. 1 threat to the United States.
as if that sweaty orange glans understands any of this. "Defeating the Islamic State". OK reality TV man. That narrows it down. Nice and granular.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:28 am
by Digby
morepork wrote:
as if that sweaty orange glans understands any of this. "Defeating the Islamic State". OK reality TV man. That narrows it down. Nice and granular.
His secret plan remains an odd one, he has made some attempts to say he'll give the generals 30 days to come up with a plan rather than do it himself, but he was also quite clear he knew more than the generals and he had a plan himself. It's going to take some doing seeing as he's only got until 8 weeks after Christmas mind.
If he actually does have a plan which is both actionable and not massively illegal then fair play to the fat lad, but I'd tend to think Gats will lit upon an idea to beat NZ before the chubby orange one thinks of anything.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:59 pm
by rowan
WaspInWales wrote:
rowan wrote:& this is why I regarded him as the lesser of 2 evils:
A Pentagon memo outlining the incoming Trump administration’s top “defense priorities” identifies defeating the Islamic State, eliminating budget caps, developing a new cybersecurity strategy, and finding greater efficiencies as the president-elect’s primary concerns. But the memo, obtained by Foreign Policy, does not include any mention of Russia, which has been identified by senior military officials as the No. 1 threat to the United States.
Haven't clicked the link but did it mention North Korea? Some of of Trump's new buddies seem convinced that North Korea are the most bigly-est threat to the US at the moment.
Remind me, who is among North Korea's biggest friends on the international stage? Putin by any chance?
I'm sure Trump and co fucking with Kim Jong-un will have no knock-on effects with relationships with Russia.
Trump's already doing what we hoped he would do - making things more blatant than ever. The mask has slipped. Clinton would have got away with it all under a feminist smokescreen, her critics dismissed as sexists, just as Obama has got away with bombing 7 countries because he's the first African-American president. With Trump the focus can only be on his politics, the punches won't be pulled, and no all-purpose human rights card will be played to silence his detractors. Trump is the true face of American politics. The fact he is likely to abandon the mess his country has made of Syria, and avoid confrontation with Russia, is also in his favor.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 3:30 pm
by morepork
"her critics dismissed as sexists".
Balls. No individual is that fucking simple. Not even orange smeg face. You've taken the focus of media on Trump's in your face sexism (grab them by the pussies fat white men of the world!) and conflated that to some grand evil master plan founded mainly on some laughable sexist smokescreen. I'm no fan of Clinton but, again, she fucking lost, so lets try and move on shall we. Obama has not got away with anything based on the colour of his skin either. He has bitched out on a lot of things but at least he has risen above being called a foreginer/muslim (Trump saying he has nothing against coloured people because "my president is one of the blacks") in his time in office. You are swallowing some double-irony reverse counter non-PC is the new PC bullshit like a muthafucker.
Trump is an unmitigated fuckwit and your continued attempts to make Clinton look bad by measuring her up against him are just tragic. Yes, Clinton is a ruthless money grubbing bitch. She is not in power, so do what any sane person would do given the current context and mock that jowled used prophylactic sheath of a man like a ginger step child.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 3:34 pm
by Eugene Wrayburn
morepork wrote:"her critics dismissed as sexists".
Balls. No individual is that fucking simple. Not even orange smeg face. You've taken the focus of media on Trump's in your face sexism (grab them by the pussies fat white men of the world!) and conflated that to some grand evil master plan founded mainly on some laughable sexist smokescreen. I'm no fan of Clinton but, again, she fucking lost, so lets try and move on shall we. Obama has not got away with anything based on the colour of his skin either. He has bitched out on a lot of things but at least he has risen above being called a foreginer/muslim (Trump saying he has nothing against coloured people because "my president is one of the blacks") in his time in office. You are swallowing some double-irony reverse counter non-PC is the new PC bullshit like a muthafucker.
Trump is an unmitigated fuckwit and your continued attempts to make Clinton look bad by measuring her up against him are just tragic. Yes, Clinton is a ruthless money grubbing bitch. She is not in power, so do what any sane person would do given the current context and mock that jowled used prophylactic sheath of a man like a ginger step child.
Preach brother.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 3:42 pm
by rowan
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
morepork wrote:"her critics dismissed as sexists".
Balls. No individual is that fucking simple. Not even orange smeg face. You've taken the focus of media on Trump's in your face sexism (grab them by the pussies fat white men of the world!) and conflated that to some grand evil master plan founded mainly on some laughable sexist smokescreen. I'm no fan of Clinton but, again, she fucking lost, so lets try and move on shall we. Obama has not got away with anything based on the colour of his skin either. He has bitched out on a lot of things but at least he has risen above being called a foreginer/muslim (Trump saying he has nothing against coloured people because "my president is one of the blacks") in his time in office. You are swallowing some double-irony reverse counter non-PC is the new PC bullshit like a muthafucker.
Trump is an unmitigated fuckwit and your continued attempts to make Clinton look bad by measuring her up against him are just tragic. Yes, Clinton is a ruthless money grubbing bitch. She is not in power, so do what any sane person would do given the current context and mock that jowled used prophylactic sheath of a man like a ginger step child.
Preach brother.
Right, so why hasn't Trump got a Nobel Peace Prize yet? Doh!
Of course being the first African-American president smoke-screened a lot of the war crimes which occurred under Obama. Any other president and the international press would have savaged him. & of course the race card was played many times by the media, just as the gender card was played many times by the media to defend Clinton - and condemn her critics - during campaigning. The very fact you have entered into a fit of frothing contortions in response to my post is evidence of its accuracy. & I'm not defending Trump, as you seem to believe. Quite the opposite. The point of my post was that now the mask is off, we see American politics for what it really is - wars and all. No one's going to be fooled nor blackmailed into silence over Trump, regardless how hard you and your ilk may try . . .
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 3:51 pm
by morepork
Me and my ilk....FFS.
I live in the USandA you fucking dummkopf, and I'm telling you that the situation is far more nuanced than you are presenting.