I meant the corruption of the model, not individual corruption.Digby wrote:Stom wrote:The corruption of capitalism is the #1 problem in the world today. Without it, we'd have better healthcare, better equipped to cope with the Mexican piss water virus, we'd have better support for those who find themselves in any difficulty, and we'd have a far more equitable society, while allowing more and more people to become self-made millionaires.Puja wrote:
I have to say I don't agree. There is a sizeable number of American who believe in The American Dream - that anyone can make it here, no matter who you are or who your parents were - and have corrupted it to believe that success is a function of working hard and thus rich people deserve their wealth. They'd look down on a Lord or Duke, but a businessman like Trump or Bloomberg? They're part of The American Dream and any attempt to tax them or get them to contribute is jealousy from those who haven't made it against those that have.
Someone once said that Americans are perpetually in a state of being "not a millionaire - yet". Wealth taxes might not touch them now, but they're outraged at the very that you would attempt to tax the wealth of a hard earning, red-blooded, American capitalist, cause in their heart of hearts, they think that potentially that could be them if they got the breaks.
Puja
Without corruption we would indeed be doing better, but we'll have corruption whatever the system
Trump
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Trump
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
The US is fucked. We're fucked. 4 more years are nailed on.
I can't see Biden beating Trump. An incoherent, dribbling wreck may make for a good GOP President, but Biden is not someone I think the Dems could spin into 1600 Pensylvania Avenue. Trump has no idea on anything and can barely string sentences together, but I think he'd have Biden for breakfast without breaking much sweat from his Twitter routune. I'd struggle to imagine Sanders faring any better, even though I think he is the best option still available. Would like to have seen Beto take on Trump. Now that would be a TV debate worth tuning into.
Instead, lets just bask in the nothing to worry about coronavirus which will get better in time for voting...or not.
I can't see Biden beating Trump. An incoherent, dribbling wreck may make for a good GOP President, but Biden is not someone I think the Dems could spin into 1600 Pensylvania Avenue. Trump has no idea on anything and can barely string sentences together, but I think he'd have Biden for breakfast without breaking much sweat from his Twitter routune. I'd struggle to imagine Sanders faring any better, even though I think he is the best option still available. Would like to have seen Beto take on Trump. Now that would be a TV debate worth tuning into.
Instead, lets just bask in the nothing to worry about coronavirus which will get better in time for voting...or not.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
Then you've a problem convincing people across Europe of your argument, still less in America. Not that capitalism is perfect but that the other models look and have proved so much worse.Stom wrote:I meant the corruption of the model, not individual corruption.Digby wrote:Stom wrote:
The corruption of capitalism is the #1 problem in the world today. Without it, we'd have better healthcare, better equipped to cope with the Mexican piss water virus, we'd have better support for those who find themselves in any difficulty, and we'd have a far more equitable society, while allowing more and more people to become self-made millionaires.
Without corruption we would indeed be doing better, but we'll have corruption whatever the system
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Trump
OK, I have to explain, obviously.Digby wrote:Then you've a problem convincing people across Europe of your argument, still less in America. Not that capitalism is perfect but that the other models look and have proved so much worse.Stom wrote:I meant the corruption of the model, not individual corruption.Digby wrote:
Without corruption we would indeed be doing better, but we'll have corruption whatever the system
I love capitalism. It works. But it relies on the central premise of: NO MONOPOLIES!
We don't have that anymore. We have giant corps that make themselves richer by simply buying their competitors because there's no way to refuse and survive. These companies make disgusting amounts of cash for people who provide nothing for the consumer at all.
That sounds like a broken system to me.
It's meant to be that anyone can create a business and become a millionaire, not that any millionaire can become a billionaire!
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
It doesn't for me mean the system is broken, it just means corruption is rife, and the people in charge typically benefit from the corruption leading to a less beneficial outcome. Along the lines of there's noting wrong with wanting your centres to pass, indeed it's good idea, but if you then pick Tindall and Noon you'll get a less beneficial outcomeStom wrote:OK, I have to explain, obviously.Digby wrote:Then you've a problem convincing people across Europe of your argument, still less in America. Not that capitalism is perfect but that the other models look and have proved so much worse.Stom wrote:
I meant the corruption of the model, not individual corruption.
I love capitalism. It works. But it relies on the central premise of: NO MONOPOLIES!
We don't have that anymore. We have giant corps that make themselves richer by simply buying their competitors because there's no way to refuse and survive. These companies make disgusting amounts of cash for people who provide nothing for the consumer at all.
That sounds like a broken system to me.
It's meant to be that anyone can create a business and become a millionaire, not that any millionaire can become a billionaire!
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Trump
I disagree, they've changed the system. There's no-one looking after it at all. When does corruption stop being corruption and start being the system?Digby wrote:It doesn't for me mean the system is broken, it just means corruption is rife, and the people in charge typically benefit from the corruption leading to a less beneficial outcome. Along the lines of there's noting wrong with wanting your centres to pass, indeed it's good idea, but if you then pick Tindall and Noon you'll get a less beneficial outcomeStom wrote:OK, I have to explain, obviously.Digby wrote:
Then you've a problem convincing people across Europe of your argument, still less in America. Not that capitalism is perfect but that the other models look and have proved so much worse.
I love capitalism. It works. But it relies on the central premise of: NO MONOPOLIES!
We don't have that anymore. We have giant corps that make themselves richer by simply buying their competitors because there's no way to refuse and survive. These companies make disgusting amounts of cash for people who provide nothing for the consumer at all.
That sounds like a broken system to me.
It's meant to be that anyone can create a business and become a millionaire, not that any millionaire can become a billionaire!
And you're not going to change anything without massive change on a global level. It needs progressive governments in power across the entire world.
And, for me, it's insane that more parties aren't running this...
As the concept of: Capitalism is for everyone, not just the few. is something people could get behind. With promotions on small business setup, minor reductions in income tax, closing of benefit loopholes, and higher corp tax, plus an effective marketing system, you could win an election with a landslide (provided you didn't have anyone toxic leading it).
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Trump
Well yeah, but making sure to frame it as capitalism. If you don’t, you’ll get labeled a commiePuja wrote:For the many, not the few?Stom wrote:And, for me, it's insane that more parties aren't running this...
As the concept of: Capitalism is for everyone, not just the few. is something people could get behind.
Puja
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9058
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10473
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
Is he actually giving CDC a kicking in the middle of a pandemic? What the actual fuck?!morepork wrote:Tiny, tiny little man. Have we had enough yet 'Murrica?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
Of course for all we're mocking Trump, and deservedly so, he hasn't been plumbing the depths Iran has over this. Obviously lots of people in America would like to promote the clergy over science as they do in Iran, but there is something of a gap still
- morepork
- Posts: 7520
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
Digby wrote:Of course for all we're mocking Trump, and deservedly so, he hasn't been plumbing the depths Iran has over this. Obviously lots of people in America would like to promote the clergy over science as they do in Iran, but there is something of a gap still
You can have both!
https://www.npr.org/2020/03/11/81455047 ... virus-cure
- morepork
- Posts: 7520
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
It is being reported that the slow response of the gummint to implementing aggressive testing and follow up for THE VIRUS is that Jared Kushner has been tasked with researching the issue, which he is doing by way of a Facebook group he had his brother's father in law (who is a physician) set up.
I shit you not.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/1 ... ook-127941
I shit you not.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/1 ... ook-127941
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
Has he not heard about the CDC? Seriously, if listened to and given money they've actually got a few people there who know what they're doing. This is a repeat pattern though, when presented with what he considered evidence about Biden's dodgy dealings in Ukraine team Trump responded in a manner that suggested they're unaware of the FBI, which they might like to know is actually a rather large and well funded police resource
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 5:24 pm
Re: Trump
morepork wrote:It is being reported that the slow response of the gummint to implementing aggressive testing and follow up for THE VIRUS is that Jared Kushner has been tasked with researching the issue, which he is doing by way of a Facebook group he had his brother's father in law (who is a physician) set up.
I shit you not.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/1 ... ook-127941
Finally some progress!!!
Now that the government and TGPT (The Great President Trump) are using crowdsourcing to form policies, a new era of prosperity is upon us!
On a different note, I bet anyone in that Facebook group could do better than the current team in the WH in handling the epidemic. Which means that the best hope we got is that by chance Jared picks the right idea. I am going to play the lottery now: it will double my chances.