As pertinent as the argument of "We're not voting for Hunter" is, I think it's pertinent to point out that there is no evidence, even circumstantial of Hunter Biden having any involvement with underage porn or underage women.Sandydragon wrote:Whilst not helpful for Biden, unless he is implicated (with some actual evidence) then it has little bearing on his own ability to run for President. Trump is attempting to use the 'lock em up' argument again and whilst the charges could be levelled against Hillary in person, this time the link to Biden Senior is not clear.Digby wrote:I shall concede you know far more about Hunter's search history, I'd be more interested if Hunter was running for anything. Simply whether Hunter is a deeply troubled individual doesn't mean much to me, if he was as disturbed as Don's kids and was as involved in public life as Don's kids it'd mean more. And the problem with Jones isn't he's thrown in his lot with Trump, he's perfectly entitled to back the GOP platform no matter how weird it is anyone would support Trump, it's very much the utter disregard for the safety of others and how events like that at a Trump rally do speak to many people, and probably bleeds into some people not even believing Covid is a risk, or not believing it's a significant risk which needs to be strongly acted on, doubting statements from health officials, taking weird stances on vaccines, and really backing gut instinct over knowledge.Coco wrote:
Re: Hunters laptop - along with emails about Joe/Ukraine dealings.. Joes brother and his dealings, apparently tons of underage porn... and pics of Hunter and his 14 yr old niece engaged in some interesting acts... lots of stuff.... guess we will have to see what comes of it... or not.
Re: The man crowdsurfing - His name is Vernon Jones. He is a democratic state representative for Georgia that recently threw his support behind Trump instead of Joe Biden/Kamala Harris. I guess some people are shocked that a black democrat supports an orange republican.
Rudy Giuliani says that he's seen it and says that he's handed it to the police. He apparently has this material but no-one else is allowed to see it or verify it, for some reason, and it's not actually been confirmed whether his claim to have handed this "proof" to the police ever occurred.
I don't see the value in giving any credence to unsubstatiated smears from someone with a history of lying, especially given there appears to be more evidence of Giuliani being inappropriate with (what he thought was a) 15 year old girl than anything presented against Hunter.
Puja