Page 28 of 183

Re: RE: Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:44 pm
by Big D
hp18 wrote:
Big D wrote:Real shame IMO that Fraser and Galbraith are away down there. I'd have both involved in Edinburgh squads semi regularly.
But Solomons wouldn't. They're better off down south.
That's part of what makes it a shame. With a fair shot I think Fraser could have been pushing for 1st choice match day 23. SHC needs to get over the 2nd season blues, Kennedy has been patchy and Fowles is gash.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:20 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Most of those calls are spot on but Hugh Fraser is a massive mistake for both parties. Good enough to feature for Edinburgh and the last thing Scottish need is a scrum half.

Re: RE: Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:36 pm
by Mikey Brown
Big D wrote:
hp18 wrote:
Big D wrote:Real shame IMO that Fraser and Galbraith are away down there. I'd have both involved in Edinburgh squads semi regularly.
But Solomons wouldn't. They're better off down south.
That's part of what makes it a shame. With a fair shot I think Fraser could have been pushing for 1st choice match day 23. SHC needs to get over the 2nd season blues, Kennedy has been patchy and Fowles is gash.
Feels like SHC has been around for absolutely ages, or does watching Laidlaw's service really make time pass that slowly???

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:38 pm
by Big D
Mikey Brown wrote:
Big D wrote:
hp18 wrote: But Solomons wouldn't. They're better off down south.
That's part of what makes it a shame. With a fair shot I think Fraser could have been pushing for 1st choice match day 23. SHC needs to get over the 2nd season blues, Kennedy has been patchy and Fowles is gash.
Feels like SHC has been around for absolutely ages, or does watching Laidlaw's service really make time pass that slowly???
Been around for a while but only had 2 years as a non EDP I think.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:43 pm
by Big D
So, many peoples fears regarding Finns injury have been confirmed. He is set to miss the start of the season.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:46 pm
by hp18
Big D wrote:So, many peoples fears regarding Finns injury have been confirmed. He is set to miss the start of the season.
That was announced as most likely a month or two ago.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:33 pm
by Eugene Wrayburn
That's deeply concerning. Let's hope he makes a full recovery and that Glasgow take their time with him and save him from himself.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 7:18 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:That's deeply concerning. Let's hope he makes a full recovery and that Glasgow take their time with him and save him from himself.
It's old news. What concerns me is there has still been no explanation or diagnosis as to wtf happened to him. Are there going to be long term consequences? Nobody knows.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 7:59 pm
by hp18
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:That's deeply concerning. Let's hope he makes a full recovery and that Glasgow take their time with him and save him from himself.
It's old news. What concerns me is there has still been no explanation or diagnosis as to wtf happened to him. Are there going to be long term consequences? Nobody knows.
Why should it be any of our business?

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:59 pm
by Eugene Wrayburn
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:That's deeply concerning. Let's hope he makes a full recovery and that Glasgow take their time with him and save him from himself.
It's old news. What concerns me is there has still been no explanation or diagnosis as to wtf happened to him. Are there going to be long term consequences? Nobody knows.
It isn't old news that he still isn't training. It isn't old news that there's no immediate prospect of him doing the sort of hard training that you'd expect him to do in pre-season. i'd assumed if he were starting the season late that it would be because he'd missed a bit of pre-season and they wanted him to have a full one, not that he can't yet even do hard running with a only a couple of weeks to go before warm up games start. If all of that was in the public domain then I'd clearly missed it.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:32 am
by Big D
hp18 wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:That's deeply concerning. Let's hope he makes a full recovery and that Glasgow take their time with him and save him from himself.
It's old news. What concerns me is there has still been no explanation or diagnosis as to wtf happened to him. Are there going to be long term consequences? Nobody knows.
Why should it be any of our business?
I'd agree with that. The fact he was moved to a specialist neurosurgical hospital said enough IMO.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:51 am
by OptimisticJock
hp18 wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:That's deeply concerning. Let's hope he makes a full recovery and that Glasgow take their time with him and save him from himself.
It's old news. What concerns me is there has still been no explanation or diagnosis as to wtf happened to him. Are there going to be long term consequences? Nobody knows.
Why should it be any of our business?
This.

People seem to think that pro sportsmen have no right to patient confidentiality.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:53 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Why bother with injury announcements, timescales & diagnoses at all then.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:25 pm
by hp18
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Why bother with injury announcements, timescales & diagnoses at all then.
:roll:

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:56 pm
by Big D
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Why bother with injury announcements, timescales & diagnoses at all then.
We know it was a heid and puss injury. It doesn't particularly matter whether the facial damage was a broken orbital bone or the head injury severe concussion. Its not unknown for injuries to be fairly vaguely reported in some cases, like a "lower leg injury" or "upper thigh" for example.

If there were long term concerns other than the standard ones rugby players have there is little chance Glasgow/the SRU would let him near the pitch.

in terms of the start of the season it means they are relying on Clegg, Horne, Hogg and the Kiwi. Which should be fine.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:38 am
by OptimisticJock
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Why bother with injury announcements, timescales & diagnoses at all then.
You're right. In fact I've revised my opinion to be that absolutely every facet of a players medical history should be disclosed to the general public, you know, because this is the modern world and due to the Internet we have more rights than the player and that should supercede any confidentiality reasons the player has.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:49 pm
by hp18
Jonny and Henry co-captains.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 1:07 pm
by Big D
So is that a recognition that it may have been a bit too soon for Jonny to be sole captain last year?

Or more likely that Pyrgos is well liked?

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 1:56 pm
by hp18
Big D wrote:So is that a recognition that it may have been a bit too soon for Jonny to be sole captain last year?

Or more likely that Pyrgos is well liked?
Jonny was always going to be learning on the job, but he did it well. This seems more about Pyrgos also being a very experienced thinker in the squad, having them work (officially) in tandem is no bad thing.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:50 am
by hp18
Glasgow to play Canada 'A' at Stirling county, Tuesday the 30th ko 19.35

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:38 pm
by Adder


If you want to watch the gam, it's on the link.
Harlequin 7 Glasgow 12 with 5 mins to go to Half time. Glasgow were quiet for 20 mins but seem to be back on track.

Edit: Jinxed it 12-12 at HT.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 5:29 pm
by Adder
22-17 10 mins to go.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 5:47 pm
by Adder
FT Score 22-17. Enjoyable game, lots of the younger players played well. Unfortunately we didn't equalise in the dying moments after a fantastic run by Ali Price.
Another Concern Is Dunbar leaving the pitch injured...

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:05 pm
by hp18
Adder wrote:FT Score 22-17. Enjoyable game, lots of the younger players played well. Unfortunately we didn't equalise in the dying moments after a fantastic run by Ali Price.
Another Concern Is Dunbar leaving the pitch injured...
Yeah, DSD kinda bombed that. Either way, a much closer game than I expected, plenty of good to work on. Hughes, Dunbar and Grigg all injured though, the latter stretchered off with paramedics getting involved too. Hope it was just precautionary for all 3.

Re: The Glasgow Beach Rugby Thread

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:01 am
by OptimisticJock
hp18 wrote:
Adder wrote:FT Score 22-17. Enjoyable game, lots of the younger players played well. Unfortunately we didn't equalise in the dying moments after a fantastic run by Ali Price.
Another Concern Is Dunbar leaving the pitch injured...
Yeah, DSD kinda bombed that. Either way, a much closer game than I expected, plenty of good to work on. Hughes, Dunbar and Grigg all injured though, the latter stretchered off with paramedics getting involved too. Hope it was just precautionary for all 3.
If their protocols are anything like ours, then Grigg will be in a bad way. The crew are there for the crowd and are only to go on field if it's bad.