Page 275 of 308
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:57 pm
by gransoporro
May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:14 pm
by Sandydragon
gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Emotions running high I think? Water off a ducks back mate.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 5:50 pm
by cashead
gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 6:23 pm
by Puja
cashead wrote:gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Sandy was specifically responding to me saying I thought they'd take people off the bus and beat them if they'd managed to stop the bus. It wasn't saying "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were," it was saying, "We don't know if they would've escalated to dragging people off the bus to beat them." Whether you agree or disagree with them, I was posing a hypothetical and they were perfectly entitled to disagree.
I agree with you on a *lot* of things. Please stop being an aggressive dick about them.
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 7:45 pm
by Sandydragon
cashead wrote:gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Enough Cashead.
You were given a warning for your own behaviour. I’m getting bored of you throwing insults about when people don’t agree with you.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:33 pm
by Mikey Brown
Lock. Him. Up! Lock. Him. up!
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:19 pm
by morepork
I'm taking two ambien with a pint of red wine tonight and will deal with shit tomorrow.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:35 pm
by Sandydragon
morepork wrote:I'm taking two ambien with a pint of red wine tonight and will deal with shit tomorrow.
Don’t blame you. I hope there’s no problems in your area
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:36 pm
by cashead
Sandydragon wrote:cashead wrote:gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Enough Cashead.
You were given a warning for your own behaviour. I’m getting bored of you throwing insults about when people don’t agree with you.
How about not both sides-ing shit to the point of cowardice that you expect people to play nice with open bigots, then? That would be a nice change of pace.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:39 pm
by Sandydragon
cashead wrote:Sandydragon wrote:cashead wrote:
Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Enough Cashead.
You were given a warning for your own behaviour. I’m getting bored of you throwing insults about when people don’t agree with you.
How about not both sides-ing shit to the point of cowardice that you expect people to play nice with open bigots, then? That would be a nice change of pace.
Goodbye Cashead. Take a break.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:41 pm
by Mikey Brown
morepork wrote:I'm taking two ambien with a pint of red wine tonight and will deal with shit tomorrow.
Sandyvagina and Asshead bickering getting too much for you as well?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:42 pm
by Mikey Brown
We can say what we want in here, right? Please don’t ban me.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:44 pm
by Sandydragon
Mikey Brown wrote:We can say what we want in here, right? Please don’t ban me.
Don’t abuse other posters. That’s the basic rule. If you act like a cunt then don’t cry when you get banned. Can’t put it much simpler to be fair.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:21 pm
by Donny osmond
Ban him! Ban him! Ban him!
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:21 pm
by Donny osmond
Mikey I mean
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:59 pm
by Digby
Sandydragon wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:We can say what we want in here, right? Please don’t ban me.
Don’t abuse other posters. That’s the basic rule. If you act like a cunt then don’t cry when you get banned. Can’t put it much simpler to be fair.
You nearly always manage to come across as very simple, so congrats.
back on the election it's bloody fortunate the weather is playing ball with long queues across the states, today could've gone much, much worse in an election that was built for months in advance to suppress votes
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:03 pm
by WaspInWales
Donny osmond wrote:Mikey I mean
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
Shit, didn't realise we could choose.
Let's have a RR banning election! [emoji23]
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:27 pm
by J Dory
there is so few of us left, i'm not sure bans serve the purpose they once did
anyway, Trump 2020 bitches, yeah
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:38 pm
by Digby
Will there be a Trump 2024?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:40 pm
by Digby
Nobody seems to think Florida has gone blue, which is a shame as that would be goodnight Irene early doors
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:13 am
by Puja
Digby wrote:Nobody seems to think Florida has gone blue, which is a shame as that would be goodnight Irene early doors
Far too early for anyone to be making that kind of prediction based on anything more than guesswork. Interesting stat on Florida from Nate Silver:
It looks as though Republicans will wind up with around a net +2 percent on [voters based on] party registration in Florida. That’s not terrible for them, and they reversed a slight Democratic disadvantage based on early and absentee voting. But it’s also not great. Based on the partisan splits in recent polls of Florida, I estimated that — because Biden is doing better among independents in most polls of the state and gets somewhat more crossover voters — the breakeven point for a Trump win was about R +3.5 in Florida. That is, if Republicans led in turnout by 3.5 points or more, Trump would be the favorite to win; otherwise Biden would be. We’ll probably end up just to the Biden side of the line. With that said, there’s a lot of uncertainty. Some polls in Florida showed Biden with big leaders among independents in Florida, while in others he was running evenly with Trump.
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:17 am
by Digby
Even the Biden camp are going with the we lost Florida line, and they're uber buoyant right now
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:44 am
by Puja
Digby wrote:Even the Biden camp are going with the we lost Florida line, and they're uber buoyant right now
Yeah, I think you're right. Looks like Biden's lost too much of the Latino vote to Trump's socialist "slur".
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2020 3:24 am
by Sandydragon
Anyone else a bit nervous at the moment. It feels much tighter than the polls suggested (sounds familiar).
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2020 3:36 am
by morepork
It will take till the end of the week. PA were only allowed to start counting mail ins today. At least 8 counties will not start tallying mail until tomorrow. another pint?