Pardon me while I wipe away a solitary tear and pray for a dead nazi.
P.S. the only good nazi is a dead nazi. hth.
Pretty low buddy, pretty low.
Please, no lecture. I know what is happening on my stoop. HTH.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:07 am
by cashead
morepork wrote:
cashead wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:Stay classy.
Pardon me while I wipe away a solitary tear and pray for a dead nazi.
P.S. the only good nazi is a dead nazi. hth.
Pretty low buddy, pretty low.
Please, no lecture. I know what is happening on my stoop. HTH.
If I do something as dumbfuck as storm a government building because I'm butthurt about a fascist losing an election and die in the process, then you go ahead and joke about it.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:38 am
by Sandydragon
This sums it up.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 10:24 pm
by Puja
cashead wrote:
morepork wrote:
cashead wrote:
Pardon me while I wipe away a solitary tear and pray for a dead nazi.
P.S. the only good nazi is a dead nazi. hth.
Pretty low buddy, pretty low.
Please, no lecture. I know what is happening on my stoop. HTH.
If I do something as dumbfuck as storm a government building because I'm butthurt about a fascist losing an election and die in the process, then you go ahead and joke about it.
Speaking of amusing Darwin awards:
FB_IMG_1610230936098.jpg
I've done some.basic digging and this does appear to be how the death listed as "heart attack" actually happened - home made taser, tucked in the front of his trousers.
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:51 pm
by Digby
I don't object to people taking the piss out of dead people, because I've not really any issue with people being offensive. But there is a certain amount of hypocrisy in some of this, to which whatever and to each their own.
More importantly Ossoff and Warnock won. And there simply cannot be many blacks and jews who've won in the south of the USA, so whatever else is going on it's worth remembering a black and a jew won, in Georgia, no really, they did!
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:59 am
by zer0
I just wish there was a recording of his reaction when he found out Twatter had banned him. Would've been like an irl version of the Hitler reaction/rant video.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 4:02 am
by cashead
zer0 wrote:I just wish there was a recording of his reaction when he found out Twatter had banned him. Would've been like an irl version of the Hitler reaction/rant video.
Considering his hamfisted attempts at getting around it, it's not that hard to imagine.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 12:34 pm
by Which Tyler
Ducking hell
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:32 pm
by morepork
Complete fuckheads. That does look like those creatures thought this a viable strategy for overthrowing the result. No masks for the inner circle, because they are special. People die, lose their jobs, get evicted, and these cunts go to the trouble of setting up a party tent with Laura Branigan (?!) blaring.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 4:41 pm
by Puja
Digby wrote:I don't object to people taking the piss out of dead people, because I've not really any issue with people being offensive. But there is a certain amount of hypocrisy in some of this, to which whatever and to each their own.
More importantly Ossoff and Warnock won. And there simply cannot be many blacks and jews who've won in the south of the USA, so whatever else is going on it's worth remembering a black and a jew won, in Georgia, no really, they did!
Plus the Alaska senator Murkowski (who is on the softest edge of the Republican party and has voted against Trump a few times) has publically said that she will leave the Republicans and go independent if the party doesn't take action against Trump. So it could even end up a 51:49 Senate, which is a lot more comfortable when it comes to marginal calls.
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 4:58 pm
by Digby
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:I don't object to people taking the piss out of dead people, because I've not really any issue with people being offensive. But there is a certain amount of hypocrisy in some of this, to which whatever and to each their own.
More importantly Ossoff and Warnock won. And there simply cannot be many blacks and jews who've won in the south of the USA, so whatever else is going on it's worth remembering a black and a jew won, in Georgia, no really, they did!
Plus the Alaska senator Murkowski (who is on the softest edge of the Republican party and has voted against Trump a few times) has publically said that she will leave the Republicans and go independent if the party doesn't take action against Trump. So it could even end up a 51:49 Senate, which is a lot more comfortable when it comes to marginal calls.
Puja
There are at least 2-3 Democratic Senators who might as well be in the GOP however, and they're in a great position to be able to show their voters they're effecting change, if nothing like the change Bernie or even Joe might be after. Certainly it's not plain sailing, but at least they can get things put to a vote without the corrupt roadblock that is McConnell
I think perhaps the one issue they should get to as soon as possible is infrastructure, that is an issue they can get some bipartisan agreement on, it'd be a massive injection into the economy, and the USA is sorely in need of it.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 5:10 pm
by Puja
Digby wrote:
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:I don't object to people taking the piss out of dead people, because I've not really any issue with people being offensive. But there is a certain amount of hypocrisy in some of this, to which whatever and to each their own.
More importantly Ossoff and Warnock won. And there simply cannot be many blacks and jews who've won in the south of the USA, so whatever else is going on it's worth remembering a black and a jew won, in Georgia, no really, they did!
Plus the Alaska senator Murkowski (who is on the softest edge of the Republican party and has voted against Trump a few times) has publically said that she will leave the Republicans and go independent if the party doesn't take action against Trump. So it could even end up a 51:49 Senate, which is a lot more comfortable when it comes to marginal calls.
Puja
There are at least 2-3 Democratic Senators who might as well be in the GOP however, and they're in a great position to be able to show their voters they're effecting change, if nothing like the change Bernie or even Joe might be after. Certainly it's not plain sailing, but at least they can get things put to a vote without the corrupt roadblock that is McConnell
I think perhaps the one issue they should get to as soon as possible is infrastructure, that is an issue they can get some bipartisan agreement on, it'd be a massive injection into the economy, and the USA is sorely in need of it.
That's what I mean - 50:50 Senate and it becomes the Senator Manchin show and, as you said, he's further right than some of the GOP. If it's 51:49, then they've got options.
I'd say their priority should be whatever horse trading they need to accomplish to get DC Statehood. The Senate is stacked against the Democrats as things stand, because the 3 men and a cow in Montana who always vote red have the same two senators as all of California or New York. There are lots of small rural states and it means it takes a massive Democratic swing to take the Senate. Adding an extra 2 Blue senators for DC would change things massively and, AFAIK, they only need a majority vote to get it through the Senate.
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 5:21 pm
by Buggaluggs
Reversing all the gerrymandering would be useful too. The down ticket races go R in many cases due to bizarre re-redistricting.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:19 pm
by morepork
I'm wondering if Mike Pence is reminded at this time of the fable of the frog and the scorpion? Or maybe a biblical tale of when a pious man was fucked by the long fickle dick of God.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:40 pm
by Stom
morepork wrote:I'm wondering if Mike Pence is reminded at this time of the fable of the frog and the scorpion? Or maybe a biblical tale of when a pious man was fucked by the long fickle dick of God.
I loved hearing Woody Harelson talking about Pence. They both went to the same seminary at the same time. Just one was rather more... zealous in his religion than the other.
Lol
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:48 pm
by paddy no 11
Which Tyler wrote:Ducking hell
What is this exactly, watching the riot and directing from a field tent somewhere???
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:13 pm
by Mikey Brown
It’s the revolution, baby.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:34 am
by cashead
Wel well well, if it isn't the consequences of my actions...
You sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:38 am
by cashead
How it started
How it's going.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:46 am
by cashead
And here's the last pre-suspension tweet put out by the wet, orange pisspig.
He could always move over to Parler... oh, wait.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 5:20 am
by cashead
Last one, for now.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:22 am
by Sandydragon
paddy no 11 wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Ducking hell
What is this exactly, watching the riot and directing from a field tent somewhere???
Its pre-riot. Trump hasn't spoken yet (from what I can work out). The field tent monitoring bit looks about right.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:56 am
by Puja
cashead wrote:Wel well well, if it isn't the consequences of my actions...
You sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
That is absolutely delightful. Here, have some more:
"They're treating me like a fucking black person!!!"
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 10:46 am
by Sandydragon
Puja wrote:
cashead wrote:Wel well well, if it isn't the consequences of my actions...
You sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
That is absolutely delightful. Here, have some more:
"They're treating me like a fucking black person!!!"
Puja
That 4 second video nicely summarises the psychological makeup of your average Trump supporting, gun toting headbanger.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:02 am
by Which Tyler
cashead wrote:Wel well well, if it isn't the consequences of my actions...
...
You sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
Sandydragon wrote:
Its pre-riot. Trump hasn't spoken yet (from what I can work out). The field tent monitoring bit looks about right.