Page 299 of 308
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:21 am
by Sandydragon
Which Tyler wrote:cashead wrote:Wel well well, if it isn't the consequences of my actions...
...
You sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
Sandydragon wrote:
Its pre-riot. Trump hasn't spoken yet (from what I can work out). The field tent monitoring bit looks about right.
Yup - found that out last night
I don't think such things are unusual, but the attitude of the Trump loyalists inside is interesting given the nature of the speeches being made and how inflammatory they are. Its only a short clip but theres no sense that anyone is worried that they might provoke a riot.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:31 am
by Digby
It's actually quite a normal scene before a big speech is being given, at least for those speakers who want to feed on the energy of the crowd, plenty prefer calm and quiet
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:07 pm
by Which Tyler
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:42 pm
by paddy no 11
Their attempted coup was as well planned as anything they've done in government - hopeless
They should have got young Thatcher in as a consultant
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:08 pm
by Sandydragon
paddy no 11 wrote:Their attempted coup was as well planned as anything they've done in government - hopeless
They should have got young Thatcher in as a consultant
As Ive written previously, we should be thankful that Trump isn't competent. Stacking the Pentagon with loyalists is one thing, but in reality the people in uniform won't go against the constitution unless they are absolute Trump loyalists. A bad situation could have been worse if military units had cooperated with Trump as some kind of follow up.
A riot in the Capitol Building is bad, but it wouldn't change events sufficiently to keep Trump as president. Those idiots running around Washington would not have lasted that long against well trained troops sent to remove them. If it were a serious attempt to keep Trump as President, it was very half arsed.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:15 pm
by Sandydragon
If anything, last weeks riot feels more like a warning shot rather than an actual attempted insurgency/coup. The reaction to the violence by many republicans has probably proven that a large number respect the constitution over their party, but a good minority still support what happened (as far as polls are in any way accurate). Might that give a hint on future intentions? Was this some kind of survey to see how strong support for Trump was nationally?
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:25 pm
by Sandydragon
Or is Trump so delusional that he firmly believed that a show of force by loyalists would persuade Senators to overturn the election (regardless of their constitutional authority to do anything of the sort)? Trump isn't used to being told 'no' and he has surrounded himself with loyalists who probably didn't point out the flaw in his masterplan.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:49 pm
by morepork
Sandydragon wrote:Or is Trump so delusional that he firmly believed that a show of force by loyalists would persuade Senators to overturn the election (regardless of their constitutional authority to do anything of the sort)? Trump isn't used to being told 'no' and he has surrounded himself with loyalists who probably didn't point out the flaw in his masterplan.
That is exactly what he thought.
The loyalists he has surrounded himself with are not exactly bright bulbs. In the main they are wealthy white people with no real life experience. They can't organise shit. Look at the coranvirus response for an example.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:22 pm
by Digby
I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:41 pm
by morepork
Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
Combination of thick and lazy. Doesn't prepare for anything, is profoundly ignorant as a result. Just listen to the phone calls of his that get leaked. If it is not scripted for him he is unable to think on his feet. All he can cope with is talking about himself.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:43 pm
by Stom
Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
I think I remember Tony Schwartz, the man who wrote the art of the deal for Trump, saying he was thick as two short planks.
Lol.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 5:23 pm
by Sandydragon
Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
I think he has zero political or government intelligence. He is very used to getting his own way or at least having a lawyer fight it out in court. The concept of not being able to do something absolutely due to the constitution or criminal law is probably a bit alien to him.
I don’t think he is bright; I do think he has the intelligence of a bully in that he knows how to push people around.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 7:55 pm
by gransoporro
Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
Neither fully describes him. He is not thick, I don’t think.
You have to add other dimensions. What if he, maybe, had some mental health issue?
Something that makes him amoral, but also shields him from reality by believing, I don’t know, that he is always right and when he is not getting what he wants it is because he was cheated.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 7:59 pm
by gransoporro
morepork wrote:Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
Combination of thick and lazy. Doesn't prepare for anything, is profoundly ignorant as a result. Just listen to the phone calls of his that get leaked. If it is not scripted for him he is unable to think on his feet. All he can cope with is talking about himself.
He is always right, therefore he doesn’t need to prepare. And he is not thick: he is ignorant. Of everything, except the issues of his fan club: those he knows...
But then again why be knowledgeable when you are always right anyway. Preparing is time wasted.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:54 pm
by Stom
gransoporro wrote:Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
Neither fully describes him. He is not thick, I don’t think.
You have to add other dimensions. What if he, maybe, had some mental health issue?
Something that makes him amoral, but also shields him from reality by believing, I don’t know, that he is always right and when he is not getting what he wants it is because he was cheated.
He's a big kid. He's a narcissistic abuser with daddy issues and a giant chip on his shoulder. See also: Orban, Duterte, Modi, Bolsonaro, Johnson, Erdogan...
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 10:37 am
by paddy no 11
100% stom
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:28 am
by Sandydragon
gransoporro wrote:morepork wrote:Digby wrote:I still cannot decide if he's really that thick or it's all just an act.
Combination of thick and lazy. Doesn't prepare for anything, is profoundly ignorant as a result. Just listen to the phone calls of his that get leaked. If it is not scripted for him he is unable to think on his feet. All he can cope with is talking about himself.
He is always right, therefore he doesn’t need to prepare. And he is not thick: he is ignorant. Of everything, except the issues of his fan club: those he knows...
But then again why be knowledgeable when you are always right anyway. Preparing is time wasted.
I suppose the question is 'how hard is to be run an international property business when you are gifted a million dollars by your dad and have a name to capitalise on'?
Its hard to tell how successful Trump has been by his refusal to publish accounts. Has he been propped up by dodgy Russian businessmen as claimed or is he actually fairly profitable across his ventures? Who knows.
And what does that mean for him being acused as being as thick as mince? Can you run that organisation by being that dull, or be so reliant on talented staff to manage it for you?
I completely agree with Stom on his personal issues. But does that make him stupid? or is this an indication that he can be experienced in business but at a loss in the working of government?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:43 am
by Sandydragon
Although this does somewhat torpedo any credibility as a businessman that he might have:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... -made-myth
Trump Even Inherited His Self-Made Myth
His wealth had everything to do with his father, including the fable of how it happened.
By Timothy L. O'Brien
3 October 2018, 12:07 BST
“I had zero borrowings from the estate,” Donald Trump told me back in 2004. “I give you my word.”
The estate the future president was referring to was the lucrative collection of housing and commercial properties his father Fred had assembled over decades, making the Trump family wealthy. Based on reporting I had done for a biography, “TrumpNation,” it was my understanding that Trump had turned to his siblings for a pair of loans totaling $30 million so he could avoid plunging into personal bankruptcy in the early 1990s.
Trump’s siblings doubted their brother could repay them because his collection of condominium buildings, casinos, hotels and other assorted properties was collapsing under the weight of billions of dollars in bank loans he couldn’t repay. So they made him pledge his future share of his father’s estate as collateral and loaned him the money. Trump gave me his “word” that none of that had happened, but I wrote about it anyway. When he later unsuccessfully sued me for libel he was forced to acknowledge under oath during the litigation that he had, indeed, borrowed from his family.
“We would have literally closed down,” a former Trump Organization employee with direct knowledge of Trump’s attempts to keep his company and himself afloat told me in 2005. “The key would have been in the door and there would have been no more Donald Trump. The family saved him.”
It wasn’t really the entire family that saved Trump, of course. It was Fred, the man who held the purse strings. And the president, who is 72, has spent about five decades pretending not only that his father never rescued him from bankruptcy but that he played a minimal role in his business successes.
“It has not been easy for me,” Trump said in 2015 during the presidential race. “My father gave me a small loan of a million dollars.”
As I noted in a column in 2016, Trump was lying when he said that — allowing him to also gloss over how central his father was to his career.
When Trump entered the Manhattan real estate business in the mid-1970s, Fred cosigned bank loans for tens of millions of dollars, making it possible for Trump to develop early projects like the Grand Hyatt hotel. When he targeted Atlantic City’s casino market, Fred loaned him about $7.5 million to get started. When he floundered there in the ’90s, Fred sent a lawyer into a Trump casino to buy $3.5 million in chips so his son could use the funds for a bond payment and avoid filing for corporate bankruptcy. There are many other examples like these.
But don’t take my word for it. Just read a deeply reported and devastating account of the Trump family’s finances and tax maneuvers that The New York Times published late Tuesday afternoon. The Times’s reporting indicates that Fred ultimately loaned Donald about $60.7 million, significantly more than I had reported. The Times reporting also goes well beyond that topic.
Fred and his wife, Mary, structured their estate holdings and the income they generated in ways both legal and dubious so that they transferred “over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances,” the Times reported. Instead, the Trumps paid $52.2 million in taxes, a rate of about 5 percent.
The Times also reported that Trump “received the equivalent today of at least $413 million from his father’s real estate empire.” It added that those riches flowed more fully due to “dubious tax schemes [Trump] participated in during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud.” The Trumps did this, in part, by “grossly undervaluing” the properties they intended to pass on to their children. (A lawyer for Trump told the Times that the president, his parents and his siblings relied on outside advisers for tax planning purposes and that nothing they did was fraudulent.)
New York state tax authorities said that they plan to investigate the Trump family’s tax filings in response to the Times article, though given the amount of time that has passed since the Trumps used the techniques the article highlights it may be difficult for authorities to find wrongdoing.
One person who might be able to enlighten them is Allen Weisselberg, who was Fred Trump’s accountant and is now the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer. He recently entered into an immunity agreement to cooperate with federal prosecutors in Manhattan who have been investigating a Trump lawyer, Michael Cohen.
For its part, the Times said that its “investigation makes clear that in every era of Mr. Trump’s life, his finances were deeply entwined with, and dependent on, his father’s wealth.”
Trump also reportedly tried to make stealth changes in his father’s will to give himself greater control over the family fortune, but Fred caught on and stopped the move. (Fred died in 1999.) Despite interfamilial greed, Fred kept finding questionable ways to pass income from his businesses to his children.
In one instance, Fred set up a shell company called All County Building Supply & Maintenance to ostensibly purchase equipment, appliances and supplies for Trump-owned properties. But the Trumps just marked up the cost of purchases the company already made and channeled the excess money — unreported and thus untaxed as gifts — to Fred’s children and one of their cousins, the Times reported. Fred also used the bogus increase in expenses to ask the government for rate hikes in his rent-controlled apartments.
Although the Times article doesn’t discuss this, the All County hi-jinks weren’t the first time Fred had padded expenses to cheat the government. In 1954, he was called before the Senate to testify about how he overcharged the federal government millions of dollars by inflating costs associated with a taxpayer-subsidized housing development in Brooklyn. That led to Fred being banned from bidding on federal housing contracts. He then focused on state-subsidized developments. But in 1966 he was called before a state investigations board to sit through embarrassing public hearings that explored how he had overbilled New York State for equipment and other costs. Those hearings essentially marked the end of Fred’s career as a major developer of publicly subsidized housing.
Within the Trump family, those episodes were recast to allow Fred and his children to explain away the legal and ethical quagmires in which Fred placed himself. The government had reached in and taken Fred’s business away, is how Trump once told me the family conceived of it. That explanation ignored the fact that Fred’s business wouldn’t have taken flight without government subsidies in the first place. Still, Fred’s mythologizing would be something Trump would later adopt in his adult years, allowing him to say that his wealth and his standing in the world had nothing to do with his father — even when they had everything to do with his father.
Putting aside the Apprentice, which I think probably has been a successful venture and just needed a twat to front it, this puts his business record in a whole new light.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:20 pm
by Stom
Sandydragon wrote:gransoporro wrote:morepork wrote:
Combination of thick and lazy. Doesn't prepare for anything, is profoundly ignorant as a result. Just listen to the phone calls of his that get leaked. If it is not scripted for him he is unable to think on his feet. All he can cope with is talking about himself.
He is always right, therefore he doesn’t need to prepare. And he is not thick: he is ignorant. Of everything, except the issues of his fan club: those he knows...
But then again why be knowledgeable when you are always right anyway. Preparing is time wasted.
I suppose the question is 'how hard is to be run an international property business when you are gifted a million dollars by your dad and have a name to capitalise on'?
Its hard to tell how successful Trump has been by his refusal to publish accounts. Has he been propped up by dodgy Russian businessmen as claimed or is he actually fairly profitable across his ventures? Who knows.
And what does that mean for him being acused as being as thick as mince? Can you run that organisation by being that dull, or be so reliant on talented staff to manage it for you?
I completely agree with Stom on his personal issues. But does that make him stupid? or is this an indication that he can be experienced in business but at a loss in the working of government?
Al Capone became America’s top mob boss with an IQ of 95...
Intelligence doesn’t stop you if you’re in the right place at the right time with the right tools. Trump was, too.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 3:29 pm
by paddy no 11
Sandydragon wrote:gransoporro wrote:morepork wrote:
Combination of thick and lazy. Doesn't prepare for anything, is profoundly ignorant as a result. Just listen to the phone calls of his that get leaked. If it is not scripted for him he is unable to think on his feet. All he can cope with is talking about himself.
He is always right, therefore he doesn’t need to prepare. And he is not thick: he is ignorant. Of everything, except the issues of his fan club: those he knows...
But then again why be knowledgeable when you are always right anyway. Preparing is time wasted.
I suppose the question is 'how hard is to be run an international property business when you are gifted a million dollars by your dad and have a name to capitalise on'?
Its hard to tell how successful Trump has been by his refusal to publish accounts. Has he been propped up by dodgy Russian businessmen as claimed or is he actually fairly profitable across his ventures? Who knows.
And what does that mean for him being acused as being as thick as mince? Can you run that organisation by being that dull, or be so reliant on talented staff to manage it for you?
I completely agree with Stom on his personal issues. But does that make him stupid? or is this an indication that he can be experienced in business but at a loss in the working of government?
He pays nobody
Borrows and doesn't pay back
And ties the above in litigation, its hardly intelligent just pig ignorant
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 5:05 pm
by Sandydragon
Stom wrote:Sandydragon wrote:gransoporro wrote:
He is always right, therefore he doesn’t need to prepare. And he is not thick: he is ignorant. Of everything, except the issues of his fan club: those he knows...
But then again why be knowledgeable when you are always right anyway. Preparing is time wasted.
I suppose the question is 'how hard is to be run an international property business when you are gifted a million dollars by your dad and have a name to capitalise on'?
Its hard to tell how successful Trump has been by his refusal to publish accounts. Has he been propped up by dodgy Russian businessmen as claimed or is he actually fairly profitable across his ventures? Who knows.
And what does that mean for him being acused as being as thick as mince? Can you run that organisation by being that dull, or be so reliant on talented staff to manage it for you?
I completely agree with Stom on his personal issues. But does that make him stupid? or is this an indication that he can be experienced in business but at a loss in the working of government?
Al Capone became America’s top mob boss with an IQ of 95...
Intelligence doesn’t stop you if you’re in the right place at the right time with the right tools. Trump was, too.
I'm a bit wary about being an absolutist on IQ and intelligence. Capone had little or no formal schooling so probably wouldn't score highly. But from what Ive read about him, you wouldn't assume him to be stupid.
Trump gives the impression of being pig shit thick on every level. Yet how much of that is an act?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 5:33 pm
by Stom
Sandydragon wrote:Stom wrote:Sandydragon wrote:
I suppose the question is 'how hard is to be run an international property business when you are gifted a million dollars by your dad and have a name to capitalise on'?
Its hard to tell how successful Trump has been by his refusal to publish accounts. Has he been propped up by dodgy Russian businessmen as claimed or is he actually fairly profitable across his ventures? Who knows.
And what does that mean for him being acused as being as thick as mince? Can you run that organisation by being that dull, or be so reliant on talented staff to manage it for you?
I completely agree with Stom on his personal issues. But does that make him stupid? or is this an indication that he can be experienced in business but at a loss in the working of government?
Al Capone became America’s top mob boss with an IQ of 95...
Intelligence doesn’t stop you if you’re in the right place at the right time with the right tools. Trump was, too.
I'm a bit wary about being an absolutist on IQ and intelligence. Capone had little or no formal schooling so probably wouldn't score highly. But from what Ive read about him, you wouldn't assume him to be stupid.
Trump gives the impression of being pig shit thick on every level. Yet how much of that is an act?
Capone had syphillis and his brain was a pud filled turd, he was thick as two short planks.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 5:47 pm
by Digby
Ladies and others, we were wrong to be concerned about Trump inciting a coup, his speech was totally appropriate. I for one feel ashamed to have doubted him
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:14 pm
by morepork
Still refuses to condemn the actions of the mob. Lid is well and truly off the domestic terrorism nut job jar now. What fun.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:25 pm
by Buggaluggs
Sure this isn't just Trump himself?