Life's too short to read that extended whinge.Lizard wrote:You will be pleased to learn that Alain Rolland has admitted that Peyper got something wrong: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all- ... -was-wrong
Ire v NZ - Dublin
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- cashead
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
So, you didn't read any post-match coverage out of Ireland either, then?
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
The article makes a point about Ireland not being penalised.
How Peyper didn't penalise Trimble for a deliberate knock on before Barrett 'scored', I'll never know. It was cynical and stopped a near certain try being scored. Plus there were a number of rucks where bodies were flying in off their feet quite dangerously.
How Peyper didn't penalise Trimble for a deliberate knock on before Barrett 'scored', I'll never know. It was cynical and stopped a near certain try being scored. Plus there were a number of rucks where bodies were flying in off their feet quite dangerously.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
You have to laugh at the irony of it - in his whistling days, Rolland himself was popularly known as the "cheating bent Mick" on the Welsh board here.Lizard wrote:You will be pleased to learn that Alain Rolland has admitted that Peyper got something wrong: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all- ... -was-wrong
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory
Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.
(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.
(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Earls is just a daft little bogger mouthing off and expressing his own thoughts. Nobody else in Ireland is moaning about his card. His silly utterances have absolutely nothing to do with last week's game against NZ, or with the IRFU, the team, the media, or the fans. He speaks (stupidly) for nobody but himself. His failure to engage his brain befoe opening his mouth is down to him alone. As I'm sure you can obviously see.Digby wrote:http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory
Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.
(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
Your sad attempt to get some holier-than-thou mileage out of this falls lamentably flat.
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Whereas your needless character assassination of Keith Earls hoists you to the summit of the moral high ground?
This thread has descended into the most serious heap of shyte posted on the IMB for some years. 'tis ashamed you should be.
This thread has descended into the most serious heap of shyte posted on the IMB for some years. 'tis ashamed you should be.
Idle Feck
- BBD
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
True, have we decided who is king of the hill yet?
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
- BBD
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I'm Sparticus!
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Nope.cashead wrote:So, you didn't read any post-match coverage out of Ireland either, then?
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- hellovating
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:59 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
horrendous post.Spiffy wrote:Earls is just a daft little bogger mouthing off and expressing his own thoughts. Nobody else in Ireland is moaning about his card. His silly utterances have absolutely nothing to do with last week's game against NZ, or with the IRFU, the team, the media, or the fans. He speaks (stupidly) for nobody but himself. His failure to engage his brain befoe opening his mouth is down to him alone. As I'm sure you can obviously see.Digby wrote:http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory
Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.
(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
Your sad attempt to get some holier-than-thou mileage out of this falls lamentably flat.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:01 pm
- BBD
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Careful lads, let's not do anything hasty like linking to the Croydon gazette
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
don't think much of earls comments either
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
1. What Slattery writes bears no comparisson to the unwarranted slagging that you doled out; and
2. What the feck would Slattery know about anything? - https://www.linkedin.com/in/will-slattery-08a995105
Idle Feck