RugbyRebels

Lizard wrote:You will be pleased to learn that Alain Rolland has admitted that Peyper got something wrong: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all- ... -was-wrong

Life's too short to read that extended whinge.

So, you didn't read any post-match coverage out of Ireland either, then?

The article makes a point about Ireland not being penalised.

How Peyper didn't penalise Trimble for a deliberate knock on before Barrett 'scored', I'll never know. It was cynical and stopped a near certain try being scored. Plus there were a number of rucks where bodies were flying in off their feet quite dangerously.

Lizard wrote:You will be pleased to learn that Alain Rolland has admitted that Peyper got something wrong: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all- ... -was-wrong

You have to laugh at the irony of it - in his whistling days, Rolland himself was popularly known as the "cheating bent Mick" on the Welsh board here.

http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory

Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.

(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)

Digby wrote:http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory

Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.

(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)

Earls is just a daft little bogger mouthing off and expressing his own thoughts. Nobody else in Ireland is moaning about his card. His silly utterances have absolutely nothing to do with last week's game against NZ, or with the IRFU, the team, the media, or the fans. He speaks (stupidly) for nobody but himself. His failure to engage his brain befoe opening his mouth is down to him alone. As I'm sure you can obviously see.
Your sad attempt to get some holier-than-thou mileage out of this falls lamentably flat.

Whereas your needless character assassination of Keith Earls hoists you to the summit of the moral high ground?

This thread has descended into the most serious heap of shyte posted on the IMB for some years. 'tis ashamed you should be.

True, have we decided who is king of the hill yet?

Certainment! C'est moi, so it is.

I'm Sparticus!

cashead wrote:So, you didn't read any post-match coverage out of Ireland either, then?

Nope.

Spiffy wrote:

Digby wrote:http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory

Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.

(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)

Earls is just a daft little bogger mouthing off and expressing his own thoughts. Nobody else in Ireland is moaning about his card. His silly utterances have absolutely nothing to do with last week's game against NZ, or with the IRFU, the team, the media, or the fans. He speaks (stupidly) for nobody but himself. His failure to engage his brain befoe opening his mouth is down to him alone. As I'm sure you can obviously see.
Your sad attempt to get some holier-than-thou mileage out of this falls lamentably flat.

horrendous post.

Careful lads, let's not do anything hasty like linking to the Croydon gazette

don't think much of earls comments either

Spiffy wrote:http://www.independent.ie/sport/rugby/i ... 51168.html

1. What Slattery writes bears no comparisson to the unwarranted slagging that you doled out; and

2. What the feck would Slattery know about anything? - https://www.linkedin.com/in/will-slattery-08a995105