Sarries v Clermont postponed
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
seriously sarries, what the fck, chucking game away
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
What a pointless passage of nothing. They need a try but all they do is try and milk penalties off a scrum. Dull and stupid.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
If this is Farrell’s audition for Eng capt post Hartley I think he’s failing.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
been a weird side for yonks now. Dominate sides utterly, but somehow never have ambition beyond grinding down.morepork wrote:What a pointless passage of nothing. They need a try but all they do is try and milk penalties off a scrum. Dull and stupid.
Good on faz, but rubbish kick
Last edited by Banquo on Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Banquo wrote:been a weird side for yonks now.morepork wrote:What a pointless passage of nothing. They need a try but all they do is try and milk penalties off a scrum. Dull and stupid.
Good on faz
Parra sucks the joy out of life.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Parra-sitemorepork wrote:Banquo wrote:been a weird side for yonks now.morepork wrote:What a pointless passage of nothing. They need a try but all they do is try and milk penalties off a scrum. Dull and stupid.
Good on faz
Parra sucks the joy out of life.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
The whole of Clermont should be binned on principle.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Hostile place to play. Heavyweight contest to be fair.morepork wrote:The whole of Clermont should be binned on principle.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Banquo wrote:Hostile place to play. Heavyweight contest to be fair.morepork wrote:The whole of Clermont should be binned on principle.
Yeah, nah. What was that flick it to Strettle so he can kick it straight to Goode?
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Sarries bogged that a bit, too many penalties really.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
That's just Parra-normal.morepork wrote:Banquo wrote:been a weird side for yonks now.morepork wrote:What a pointless passage of nothing. They need a try but all they do is try and milk penalties off a scrum. Dull and stupid.
Good on faz
Parra sucks the joy out of life.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Spiffy wrote:That's just Parra-normal.morepork wrote:Banquo wrote: been a weird side for yonks now.
Good on faz
Parra sucks the joy out of life.




-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Having watched Spencer this season I can now understand why Wigglesworth has been first choice for so long.Banquo wrote:yes in the backs, but something up front, maybe Wiggy is better at nagging the packMellsblue wrote:Brad BarrittBanquo wrote:Sarries defence has lost something organisationally, both wide and fringe
And Sarries really miss Barritt. Move Loz to 10 and the Iceman out to 14
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Parra is an irritating little tit whose play acting is footballesque.
That aside, Clermont the better side and deserved winners. Saracens restored a bit of pride and earned a valuable BP but they still look well short of their best.
That aside, Clermont the better side and deserved winners. Saracens restored a bit of pride and earned a valuable BP but they still look well short of their best.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
I like himmorepork wrote:Banquo wrote:been a weird side for yonks now.morepork wrote:What a pointless passage of nothing. They need a try but all they do is try and milk penalties off a scrum. Dull and stupid.
Good on faz
Parra sucks the joy out of life.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Spencer was pretty good today, bar an iffy if a little unlucky kick; but Wiggy controls the game when he plays, Faz doesn't need to do much.p/d wrote:Having watched Spencer this season I can now understand why Wigglesworth has been first choice for so long.Banquo wrote:yes in the backs, but something up front, maybe Wiggy is better at nagging the packMellsblue wrote: Brad Barritt
And Sarries really miss Barritt. Move Loz to 10 and the Iceman out to 14
Dead right on Barritt, not a good enough runner for intl, but a class club player.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Good player to have on your side, but a dick.Digby wrote:I like himmorepork wrote:Banquo wrote: been a weird side for yonks now.
Good on faz
Parra sucks the joy out of life.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Yep, different side without Barritt, Billy, Brits, Itoje. Mind....who wouldn't be! Their bench is a big downgrade at present.fivepointer wrote:Parra is an irritating little tit whose play acting is footballesque.
That aside, Clermont the better side and deserved winners. Saracens restored a bit of pride and earned a valuable BP but they still look well short of their best.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Feel like there were definite signs of Sarries turning the corner today. Not many go to Clermont and keep them tryless. All depends on who they get back for Ospreys; Barritt, LWilliams, Itoje, Rhodes and Billy...would back them to get the points they need to go through.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
ThisBanquo wrote:Good player to have on your side, but a dick.Digby wrote:I like himmorepork wrote:
Parra sucks the joy out of life.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Hardly an unusual quality in a stand out sports personMellsblue wrote:ThisBanquo wrote:Good player to have on your side, but a dick.Digby wrote:
I like him
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Could be well wide of the mark, but looking at the injury return dates, I feel that Sarries are still my favourites to win the Champions Cup again.
- Puja
- Posts: 17687
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
In fairness, the tackle was so completed that the referee actually shouted "Release! Roll away, White!" before Toeava got up and started running again. I really hate the current state of affairs where you need a signed affidavit from the ref before a player is considered properly tackled - whatever happened to it being a completed tackle if your ball-carrying arm hit the ground? It's particularly bizarre when you consider that refs now call for a tackle if a player in a choke manages to brush one knee against grass.Banquo wrote:poor by sarries twice there. Let Toeava go and dumb penalty...
It's infuriating, because refs will also ping anyone who gets trapped on the wrong side of a tackle with the idea that they should've released and rolled away before the ruck was formed. So if you release immediately, then the player will spring back to their feet and run off like you only tap tackled them, but if you hold on to make sure they're down, you get an 18 stone prop flopping on top of you while a scrum half slaps at your back and whines to the ref. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
Has this ref heard of the laws on taking a man out in the air?
Opening minute, no realistic chance to get the ball, player lands flat on his back - penalty only
60 minutes, no realistic chance to get the ball, player lands on his arse - yellow.
70 minutes, full-on tackle in the air (albeit with a perfectly safe landing) - not even looked at.
Mind, Sarries definitely had the runoff the ref in those opening minutes anyway.
We'll, okay Shaun Perry was technically an international scrum half, but still...
Opening minute, no realistic chance to get the ball, player lands flat on his back - penalty only
60 minutes, no realistic chance to get the ball, player lands on his arse - yellow.
70 minutes, full-on tackle in the air (albeit with a perfectly safe landing) - not even looked at.
Mind, Sarries definitely had the runoff the ref in those opening minutes anyway.
Has there ever been an international scrum half that doesn't fit this description?Digby wrote:Hardly an unusual quality in a stand out sports personMellsblue wrote:ThisBanquo wrote: Good player to have on your side, but a dick.
We'll, okay Shaun Perry was technically an international scrum half, but still...
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries v Clermont postponed
its a very fair point, and now I am even older and grumpier, I find laws interpretation is making me enjoy the game a lot less as I shout at the TV. Contests at the breakdown are random, forward passes routinely missed, TMO trivia interventions, as you say when a tackle is a tackle, when a maul is a maul......and actually again as you say, players being pinged for not rolling away when its physically impossible to do so. Then you layer on the increasing dissent levels. Needs a good clean up.Puja wrote:In fairness, the tackle was so completed that the referee actually shouted "Release! Roll away, White!" before Toeava got up and started running again. I really hate the current state of affairs where you need a signed affidavit from the ref before a player is considered properly tackled - whatever happened to it being a completed tackle if your ball-carrying arm hit the ground? It's particularly bizarre when you consider that refs now call for a tackle if a player in a choke manages to brush one knee against grass.Banquo wrote:poor by sarries twice there. Let Toeava go and dumb penalty...
It's infuriating, because refs will also ping anyone who gets trapped on the wrong side of a tackle with the idea that they should've released and rolled away before the ruck was formed. So if you release immediately, then the player will spring back to their feet and run off like you only tap tackled them, but if you hold on to make sure they're down, you get an 18 stone prop flopping on top of you while a scrum half slaps at your back and whines to the ref. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Puja
TMO's boil my pi55 with their unbidden nonsense, just thought I'd say that again.