Based upon what I’ve seen from Shields in SR, I said that he’s capable of better than he’s shown so far, but there’s no hiding that his performances to date have been no better than OK.Mellsblue wrote:He’s improved from poor to average. If he keeps improving he’s Robshaw with a lineout game. I don’t think he’ll ever be anything other than a good, honest test player. Nothing wrong with that but, given Wilson’s series and Robshaw’s caps and experience, I don’t see him ahead of them for the World Cup, at present.Oakboy wrote:Why? You may be convinced but I'm not. I have seen no evidence that places him ahead of Robshaw, Wilson, Willis, Lawes or Itoje in the blindside pecking order. I'd still have him behind Armand and Rhodes too. He might eventually fulfil a role in Jones's estimation but I still cannot see anything to suggest that all the fuss about poaching him from NZ was justified.twitchy wrote:I think lots of us should admit we were completely wrong about shields also. Way too quick too dismiss the guy. Wilson though is so useful he can play 6/8 and in a crisis 7.
He was terrible against SA and OK against NZ and Australia. He’s still got a lot to prove IMO.
If/when Billy is available, I’d far sooner have Wilson at 6. If Billy’s not available, but Robshaw is, I’d sooner have Robshaw at 6 and leave Wilson at 8