New kits 22-23 Edition

Moderator: Puja

Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Raggs »

There's a leaked photo that apparently wasps new away kit. Light blue with a sort of camo pattern to it. Not a huge fan, but given the home one is awesome, I'm not too worried.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Mellsblue »

My commiserations. We once had to put up with this for, I think, two seasons. Quite a few ‘you’re only supposed to look invisible’ as yet another tackle was missed.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
pandion
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by pandion »

FKAS wrote:
pandion wrote:
FKAS wrote:Well let's hope England opt to play mainly in the away shirt. I do wonder what college art students come up with some of this nonsense. The whole assign a story to it stuff annoys me as well. It's not difficult, play safe and traditional on home kit and then take chances on the away kit.

Scotland seemed to have the right idea judging by that home kit.
:o you want England to play in Black?! Go and wash your digital mouth out with soap...! :shock:

Well I never...
It's better than the Tesco two stripe home kit that a toddler has dribbled ketchup down the front of.
I love that.! England's Tesco two stripe. Trying to appeal to the working class :lol:

Also after seeing Nadolo I don't feel so bad about wearing the slim cut.
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Peej »

Didn't NZ get arsey the last time we had a black - sorry, "graphite" - kit? That new home iteration is bloody awful, mind. But if course there'll be a new one for the WC. What cost of living crisis, eh?
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Adam_P »

Saints new away kit. Not keen.

Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Raggs »

Yeah, that's a bit of an odd one, really paying homage to the sponsor there. Wouldn't have minded it as a fun Euro shirt.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17781
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Puja »

Adam_P wrote:Saints new away kit. Not keen.

I think that'll look a lot better on a pitch rather than against a purple background. Has the potential to look quite nice, I think.

Puja
Backist Monk
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by p/d »

Mellsblue wrote:Ffs
That England top is a sack of shit. What the feck is wrong with just plain white, a rose and rugby rebels in faint etching on the sleeve. Tossers
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Ffs
rugby rebels in faint etching on the sleeve. Tossers
:lol:
pandion
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by pandion »

Adam_P wrote:Saints new away kit. Not keen.

How long till Augustus qualifies for us?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17781
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Puja »

pandion wrote:How long till Augustus qualifies for us?
Not until 2026. Not exactly sure he's the missing link for England that's worth waiting 4 years for.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Adam_P »

He had the most gainline success of any forward in any of the 4 major leagues worldwide last season - that's definitely an area that England could use some bolstering.

But he's definitely South African and shouldn't play for England.
FKAS
Posts: 8511
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by FKAS »

Adam_P wrote:Saints new away kit. Not keen.

Well that makes me feel better about the Tigers offerings.
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Shiny »

Adam_P wrote:Saints new away kit. Not keen.

I always quite like Saints home kits, they seem to get them about right. But why, in the name of all that is holy do the always outsource the away kits to the local kindergarten to design. It’s the same every season.
The green, black and gold army.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5999
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Scrumhead »

Adam_P wrote:He had the most gainline success of any forward in any of the 4 major leagues worldwide last season - that's definitely an area that England could use some bolstering.

But he's definitely South African and shouldn't play for England.
I hadn’t seen that stat. Was it a total number or an average number of gainline success per game? If it’s the latter, I think it’s important to consider that a lot of his competitors would have been playing test rugby for significant chunks of the season.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Augustus as a player. However, I’m strongly opposed to taking players qualified on residency, even more so when I don’t think he’s notably better than any of our existing options (I’m including Mercer in that).
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Adam_P »

Scrumhead wrote:
Adam_P wrote:He had the most gainline success of any forward in any of the 4 major leagues worldwide last season - that's definitely an area that England could use some bolstering.

But he's definitely South African and shouldn't play for England.
I hadn’t seen that stat. Was it a total number or an average number of gainline success per game? If it’s the latter, I think it’s important to consider that a lot of his competitors would have been playing test rugby for significant chunks of the season.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Augustus as a player. However, I’m strongly opposed to taking players qualified on residency, even more so when I don’t think he’s notably better than any of our existing options (I’m including Mercer in that).
It's percentage success for players with over 100 carries - so I'd think it'd mop up a good number of internationals too.

Saw it here, some interesting stats. Murley at Quins showed up well on the carries for the backs.

https://theanalyst.com/eu/2022/08/break ... n-carries/
pandion
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by pandion »

Puja wrote:
pandion wrote:How long till Augustus qualifies for us?
Not until 2026. Not exactly sure he's the missing link for England that's worth waiting 4 years for.

Puja
Nah to long. Looks the closest to Billy
francoisfou
Posts: 2533
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by francoisfou »

The French jersey is a good’un and a country kilomètre better than the England effort that is abysmal! https://boutique.ffr.fr/media/catalog/p ... por_10.jpg
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Stom »

francoisfou wrote:The French jersey is a good’un and a country kilomètre better than the England effort that is abysmal! https://boutique.ffr.fr/media/catalog/p ... por_10.jpg
You see, I'm not so sure about that myself...
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Mellsblue »

Fairly certain the Sale jerseys haven’t been posted. Apols if they have and feel free to ask if anyone knows what Sale’s new kit looks like.
I’m a big fan of the ‘home shirt’.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tigger
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:54 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Tigger »

Apparently there is a new away kit coming as well...in the tease it was red so expect the same as the home kit...but red.
32nd Man
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:02 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by 32nd Man »

The kit is bland, and I just can't get past that sponsor logo. Like having a duplo smiley face on your chest.
Beasties
Posts: 1321
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Beasties »

Adam_P wrote:
Scrumhead wrote:
Adam_P wrote:He had the most gainline success of any forward in any of the 4 major leagues worldwide last season - that's definitely an area that England could use some bolstering.

But he's definitely South African and shouldn't play for England.
I hadn’t seen that stat. Was it a total number or an average number of gainline success per game? If it’s the latter, I think it’s important to consider that a lot of his competitors would have been playing test rugby for significant chunks of the season.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Augustus as a player. However, I’m strongly opposed to taking players qualified on residency, even more so when I don’t think he’s notably better than any of our existing options (I’m including Mercer in that).
It's percentage success for players with over 100 carries - so I'd think it'd mop up a good number of internationals too.

Saw it here, some interesting stats. Murley at Quins showed up well on the carries for the backs.

https://theanalyst.com/eu/2022/08/break ... n-carries/
Murley was one of the big successes for me last season. Very effective player, always seems to do exactly the right thing at the right moment. Which is a hell of a thing.
Beasties
Posts: 1321
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Beasties »

32nd Man wrote:The kit is bland, and I just can't get past that sponsor logo. Like having a duplo smiley face on your chest.
Very clever, designed to make the oppo descend into a fit of the giggles.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12201
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: New kits 22-23 Edition

Post by Mikey Brown »

Beasties wrote:
Adam_P wrote:
Scrumhead wrote:
I hadn’t seen that stat. Was it a total number or an average number of gainline success per game? If it’s the latter, I think it’s important to consider that a lot of his competitors would have been playing test rugby for significant chunks of the season.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Augustus as a player. However, I’m strongly opposed to taking players qualified on residency, even more so when I don’t think he’s notably better than any of our existing options (I’m including Mercer in that).
It's percentage success for players with over 100 carries - so I'd think it'd mop up a good number of internationals too.

Saw it here, some interesting stats. Murley at Quins showed up well on the carries for the backs.

https://theanalyst.com/eu/2022/08/break ... n-carries/
Murley was one of the big successes for me last season. Very effective player, always seems to do exactly the right thing at the right moment. Which is a hell of a thing.
Yep. Still don't understand how he was left out of the England tour.
Post Reply