RugbyRebels

. . . . about Brexit and that things may not be to bad after all . I mean , he should know .!


Now I'm no anti~royalist but this guy certainly undoes any credit coming their way . The guy was reportedly worth $82 million some years ago and has certainly kept some dodgy company . Has two manikin daughters who do ' charity ' work and a scatty scandal bound x~wife . He is infamous for striking up thousands of airmiles . Due to his rudeness and poor attitude to ' inferiors ' he's had more personal secretaries & private bodyguards than the rest of the whole royal family.

He should be locked away with his two clothes~horse daughters and sinister foreign ' business ' men and pimps .


Rant nearing completion .

Discreet Hooker wrote:. . . . about Brexit and that things may not be to bad after all . I mean , he should know .!


Now I'm no anti~royalist but this guy certainly undoes any credit coming their way . The guy was reportedly worth $82 million some years ago and has certainly kept some dodgy company . Has two manikin daughters who do ' charity ' work and a scatty scandal bound x~wife . He is infamous for striking up thousands of airmiles . Due to his rudeness and poor attitude to ' inferiors ' he's had more personal secretaries & private bodyguards than the rest of the whole royal family.

He should be locked away with his two clothes~horse daughters and sinister foreign ' business ' men and pimps .


Rant nearing completion .

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't describe the daughters as "mannequin" or "clothes-horse", cart-horse is more accurate.

I'm with you DH. I'm more of a monarchist than any alternative purely because I don't see the point of changing towards a grandstanding president and frankly the queen does a superb job as a apolitical head of state.

Andrew is a fricking tool of the highest order and should shut the feck up.

As for his daughters, the only operating brain cell in that picture below belongs to the horse pulling the cart.

Fergie was quite sexy when she was in her pomp. But you introduce just a little bit of those flawed Saxe-Coburg genes and the whole thing falls apart like a clown car.

Yer all an abysmal bunch of hoores. Have a dig at yer wan if ye want; any opprobrium that heads his way can be laid at his own feet. But having a pop at the girls who have done feck-all to deserve your digs is a bit crap.

I'm no monarchist and would describe myself as republican if the word hadn't been corrupted over here by the truly abysmal. But I accept that the UK has this institution as a central pillar to its unwritten constitution and that there will always be people born into it. Was it their fault that they were born to that life? Do you really think they can just walk away from it? Would you? Are ye all so fecking gorgeous that ye can take a pop at a couple of young women that frankly I'd drool over if either of my feckless son's dragged one of 'em home?

I've met a lot of these people; some of them more often that I would care to admit. One or two are entirely deserving of contempt, which is why I have no great motivation to challenge the first chunk of DH's post, but most of what follows is unimaginative, predictable and slightly pathetic shyte.

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:Yer all an abysmal bunch of hoores. Have a dig at yer wan if ye want; any opprobrium that heads his way can be laid at his own feet. But having a pop at the girls who have done feck-all to deserve your digs is a bit crap.

I'm no monarchist and would describe myself as republican if the word hadn't been corrupted over here by the truly abysmal. But I accept that the UK has this institution as a central pillar to its unwritten constitution and that there will always be people born into it. Was it their fault that they were born to that life? Do you really think they can just walk away from it? Would you? Are ye all so fecking gorgeous that ye can take a pop at a couple of young women that frankly I'd drool over if either of my feckless son's dragged one of 'em home?

I've met a lot of these people; some of them more often that I would care to admit. One or two are entirely deserving of contempt, which is why I have no great motivation to challenge the first chunk of DH's post, but most of what follows is unimaginative, predictable and slightly pathetic shyte.

Yes SW , I am gorgeous as you can plainly see . However , the possibility of your son bringing one of these spoilt cling~ons home is pretty low .Be prepared , I have warned you .

Anyone fancy a game of 'Who's got a crush on the York girls'..?.

kk67 wrote:Anyone fancy a game of 'Who's got a crush on the York girls'..?.

The hefty one or the one who looks like Andrew in drag ?


Suitors must own at least one English county .

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:Yer all an abysmal bunch of hoores. Have a dig at yer wan if ye want; any opprobrium that heads his way can be laid at his own feet. But having a pop at the girls who have done feck-all to deserve your digs is a bit crap.

I'm no monarchist and would describe myself as republican if the word hadn't been corrupted over here by the truly abysmal. But I accept that the UK has this institution as a central pillar to its unwritten constitution and that there will always be people born into it. Was it their fault that they were born to that life? Do you really think they can just walk away from it? Would you? Are ye all so fecking gorgeous that ye can take a pop at a couple of young women that frankly I'd drool over if either of my feckless son's dragged one of 'em home?

I've met a lot of these people; some of them more often that I would care to admit. One or two are entirely deserving of contempt, which is why I have no great motivation to challenge the first chunk of DH's post, but most of what follows is unimaginative, predictable and slightly pathetic shyte.

Me too. Which is why I have a lot of admiration for the Queen, a fair bit for Prince Charles, but feck all for Andy.

Discreet Hooker wrote:

kk67 wrote:Anyone fancy a game of 'Who's got a crush on the York girls'..?.

The hefty one or the one who looks like Andrew in drag ?


Suitors must own at least one English county .

If the Sarj says they're ok then I'm happy to accept that. They've certainly got a sense of humour. That hat Beattie wore at the wedding was quality. Half of the entire country learned a new word that day. And that word was........bog seat.

Stones of granite wrote:

Discreet Hooker wrote:. . . . about Brexit and that things may not be to bad after all . I mean , he should know .!


Now I'm no anti~royalist but this guy certainly undoes any credit coming their way . The guy was reportedly worth $82 million some years ago and has certainly kept some dodgy company . Has two manikin daughters who do ' charity ' work and a scatty scandal bound x~wife . He is infamous for striking up thousands of airmiles . Due to his rudeness and poor attitude to ' inferiors ' he's had more personal secretaries & private bodyguards than the rest of the whole royal family.

He should be locked away with his two clothes~horse daughters and sinister foreign ' business ' men and pimps .


Rant nearing completion .

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't describe the daughters as "mannequin" or "clothes-horse", cart-horse is more accurate.

Ive always quite fancied the one on the left whichever one she is.

onlynameleft wrote:

Stones of granite wrote:

Discreet Hooker wrote:. . . . about Brexit and that things may not be to bad after all . I mean , he should know .!


Now I'm no anti~royalist but this guy certainly undoes any credit coming their way . The guy was reportedly worth $82 million some years ago and has certainly kept some dodgy company . Has two manikin daughters who do ' charity ' work and a scatty scandal bound x~wife . He is infamous for striking up thousands of airmiles . Due to his rudeness and poor attitude to ' inferiors ' he's had more personal secretaries & private bodyguards than the rest of the whole royal family.

He should be locked away with his two clothes~horse daughters and sinister foreign ' business ' men and pimps .


Rant nearing completion .

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't describe the daughters as "mannequin" or "clothes-horse", cart-horse is more accurate.

Ive always quite fancied the one on the left whichever one she is.

The both have lovely personalities.

I'm not that bothered about her personality, you can't really see in that photo but she does have other attributes.

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:Yer all an abysmal bunch of hoores. Have a dig at yer wan if ye want; any opprobrium that heads his way can be laid at his own feet. But having a pop at the girls who have done feck-all to deserve your digs is a bit crap.

I'm no monarchist and would describe myself as republican if the word hadn't been corrupted over here by the truly abysmal. But I accept that the UK has this institution as a central pillar to its unwritten constitution and that there will always be people born into it. Was it their fault that they were born to that life? Do you really think they can just walk away from it? Would you? Are ye all so fecking gorgeous that ye can take a pop at a couple of young women that frankly I'd drool over if either of my feckless son's dragged one of 'em home?

I've met a lot of these people; some of them more often that I would care to admit. One or two are entirely deserving of contempt, which is why I have no great motivation to challenge the first chunk of DH's post, but most of what follows is unimaginative, predictable and slightly pathetic shyte.

How do you feel about older Americam women?

You've gotta work hard to overcome a name like Eugenie. You have to be an astronaut or some shit. Fair play to Nigella.

kk67 wrote:You've gotta work hard to overcome a name like Eugenie. You have to be an astronaut or some shit. Fair play to Nigella.

I watch Nigella all the time . Think she's a newsreader or something .

Coco wrote:
How do you feel about older Americam women?

By 'older' do you mean Andie McDowell or Nancy Reagan?

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Coco wrote:
How do you feel about older Americam women?

By 'older' do you mean Andie McDowell or Nancy Reagan?

Andie McDowell, but on her way to Nancy Reagan sooner than she wants to accept.

Coco wrote:

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Coco wrote:
How do you feel about older Americam women?

By 'older' do you mean Andie McDowell or Nancy Reagan?

Andie McDowell, but on her way to Nancy Reagan sooner than she wants to accept.

Ouch.

Discreet Hooker wrote:

kk67 wrote:You've gotta work hard to overcome a name like Eugenie. You have to be an astronaut or some shit. Fair play to Nigella.

I watch Nigella all the time . Think she's a newsreader or something .

No, you donut. You're thinking of Tasha Plinky-Plank.

kk67 wrote:Fergie was quite sexy when she was in her pomp. But you introduce just a little bit of those flawed Saxe-Coburg genes and the whole thing falls apart like a clown car.

No way , a gin'er who snorts but can get you access to Andy and the money machine .

Discreet Hooker wrote:

kk67 wrote:Fergie was quite sexy when she was in her pomp. But you introduce just a little bit of those flawed Saxe-Coburg genes and the whole thing falls apart like a clown car.

No way , a gin'er who snorts but can get you access to Andy and the money machine .

She went down in my estimations on several occasions. The fraud was pretty much the last straw.
I have no problem with the sexy stuff.