Wheel of Time TV show
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:36 am
We have a Moiraine
Epic fantasy - she'll be a fireball-throwing type wizardMellsblue wrote:No idea what Wheel of Time is, but if Rosamund Pike is in it then I’m watching.
I've always meant to give Jordan (it is Robert Jordan, right?) another go. Read something of his as a teenager and couldn't get into it, but heard good things about him.Which Tyler wrote:Epic fantasy - she'll be a fireball-throwing type wizardMellsblue wrote:No idea what Wheel of Time is, but if Rosamund Pike is in it then I’m watching.
That's the one - his series had some really strong books, and some utter tripe. However, it is at least, finished, along with fan reactions; so they'll be able to plan out the whole thing in advance and know where they need to add and where they need to cut (heavily).Stom wrote:I've always meant to give Jordan (it is Robert Jordan, right?) another go. Read something of his as a teenager and couldn't get into it, but heard good things about him.Which Tyler wrote:Epic fantasy - she'll be a fireball-throwing type wizardMellsblue wrote:No idea what Wheel of Time is, but if Rosamund Pike is in it then I’m watching.
I read the series a few years ago. Some really excellent stuff and some garbage as well. Those two books mid series where he tried to describe the taming of the source from different perspectives in two novels just didn’t work. I know a lot of people who hated the final book, although I quite enjoyed it, and if I remember correctly the original author died and it was finished by his brother (?) using notesWhich Tyler wrote:That's the one - his series had some really strong books, and some utter tripe. However, it is at least, finished, along with fan reactions; so they'll be able to plan out the whole thing in advance and know where they need to add and where they need to cut (heavily).Stom wrote:I've always meant to give Jordan (it is Robert Jordan, right?) another go. Read something of his as a teenager and couldn't get into it, but heard good things about him.Which Tyler wrote: Epic fantasy - she'll be a fireball-throwing type wizard
Quite honestly, I wouldn't bother with the reading (maybe an audiobook as it's less time consuming if you feel like it); and just trust the show to know what's what - it might not work, but there's over 11,000 pages of material to read in there.
The feminism thing is hugely overblown in my opinion. It is a matriarchal society but it’s clear that there are flaws with this and if anything Jordan seems to me to be arguing for balance, not supremacy of one sex. And some of the female characters are terrible, I never took to Egwene.Stom wrote:I'm in the middle of book three, and, well, I don't get that this would make a particularly good TV show...
Also, feminism with the Aes Sedai? I'm not sure I get it: most of them are pretty repellant characters with little in the way of a female touch.
I think I'd have much preferred Feist's Riftwar series as an epic fantasy TV show.
most fantasy writers are white middle aged men. They're not going to get their balance right with female or ethnic minority characters. It's why high fantasy with orcs and elves is often better, as those are you distinct races and you don't have to think about reality.Sandydragon wrote:The feminism thing is hugely overblown in my opinion. It is a matriarchal society but it’s clear that there are flaws with this and if anything Jordan seems to me to be arguing for balance, not supremacy of one sex. And some of the female characters are terrible, I never took to Egwene.Stom wrote:I'm in the middle of book three, and, well, I don't get that this would make a particularly good TV show...
Also, feminism with the Aes Sedai? I'm not sure I get it: most of them are pretty repellant characters with little in the way of a female touch.
I think I'd have much preferred Feist's Riftwar series as an epic fantasy TV show.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rand is the central character in the books so it will be interesting to see how they handle him in the series. Book one did seem him as very much under Moraines’ influence so if this is season one and it’s going to focus on the first book then Moraine was a dominant character.Stom wrote:most fantasy writers are white middle aged men. They're not going to get their balance right with female or ethnic minority characters. It's why high fantasy with orcs and elves is often better, as those are you distinct races and you don't have to think about reality.Sandydragon wrote:The feminism thing is hugely overblown in my opinion. It is a matriarchal society but it’s clear that there are flaws with this and if anything Jordan seems to me to be arguing for balance, not supremacy of one sex. And some of the female characters are terrible, I never took to Egwene.Stom wrote:I'm in the middle of book three, and, well, I don't get that this would make a particularly good TV show...
Also, feminism with the Aes Sedai? I'm not sure I get it: most of them are pretty repellant characters with little in the way of a female touch.
I think I'd have much preferred Feist's Riftwar series as an epic fantasy TV show.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm interested to see what a Trolloc looks like, and how they differentiate from an Ogier, but I can't say any of the characters really look like they did in my imagination. I understand the desire to 'ethnic it up', but the whole point is that they're from an inbred backwater - they're meant to all look similar...EXCEPT RAND. But he's not the main character, is he? That's going to be Moraine, which seems like telling a different story to me.
As I said, I think the Riftwar had a lot more scope for this. You could change the race of characters quite cleanly without problem, and the main antagonists, and then later on the allies are Asian. So it's, well, a lot more balanced. And, to me, seems a lot better written. So far, The Wheel of Time is, for me, fast paced for the sake of fast paced. There's not much in the way of variance, characters make decisions for the purpose of the plot alone...
Well, I guess that last point sets it up perfectly as a successor to GoT, lol. The series, at least.
That’s not far from how I imagined it. Look pretty cool.Which Tyler wrote:
Whilst the tower itself looks like...
I’m quite enjoying it. Not as gripping as GOT was in the first four seasons but I hope it can keep going as it has been given the tv producers have the entire book series to work with.fivepointer wrote:I've not read the books but have been watching the tv series.
Its quite enjoyable but not in the same league as GoT.
Druss the Legend is a great character (weren’t they going to make a film?) and Waylander also a great anti hero. Gemmells strength is in keeping the story telling to the front and not getting too carried away with distractions. There’s the source and some supernatural elements but much of the plot could be set in a medieval landscape without the magic.Donny osmond wrote:Gemmell was the all time best afaic. Miles ahead of anyone else I've read. Other fantasy writers get lost in their own bullshit but Gemmell just kept it 'real'. I usually like Iggulden too.
Sent from my CPH2195 using Tapatalk
So I’m half way through book 4 now and… it’s sometimes a struggle. Any time characters interact with each other it’s just terrible. The history and the section with Rand in Rhuidean was really good for me, I loved piecing together the history instead of having it told to me in one go.Which Tyler wrote:That's the one - his series had some really strong books, and some utter tripe. However, it is at least, finished, along with fan reactions; so they'll be able to plan out the whole thing in advance and know where they need to add and where they need to cut (heavily).Stom wrote:I've always meant to give Jordan (it is Robert Jordan, right?) another go. Read something of his as a teenager and couldn't get into it, but heard good things about him.Which Tyler wrote: Epic fantasy - she'll be a fireball-throwing type wizard
Quite honestly, I wouldn't bother with the reading (maybe an audiobook as it's less time consuming if you feel like it); and just trust the show to know what's what - it might not work, but there's over 11,000 pages of material to read in there.
The middle books are hard work. It’s worth it at the other end but Jordan tries a few things mid series that don’t really work.Stom wrote:So I’m half way through book 4 now and… it’s sometimes a struggle. Any time characters interact with each other it’s just terrible. The history and the section with Rand in Rhuidean was really good for me, I loved piecing together the history instead of having it told to me in one go.Which Tyler wrote:That's the one - his series had some really strong books, and some utter tripe. However, it is at least, finished, along with fan reactions; so they'll be able to plan out the whole thing in advance and know where they need to add and where they need to cut (heavily).Stom wrote:
I've always meant to give Jordan (it is Robert Jordan, right?) another go. Read something of his as a teenager and couldn't get into it, but heard good things about him.
Quite honestly, I wouldn't bother with the reading (maybe an audiobook as it's less time consuming if you feel like it); and just trust the show to know what's what - it might not work, but there's over 11,000 pages of material to read in there.
But my God, if they’re all like this, I’m going to struggle to finish this. I hear Sanderson is better, but that’s a good 2 million words away…
If you've made it past the opening 3 books with their bog-standard hero's journey and hunt for the McGuffin; I'd recommend getting to the end of book 7 before really re-assessing commitment.Stom wrote: So I’m half way through book 4 now and… it’s sometimes a struggle. Any time characters interact with each other it’s just terrible. The history and the section with Rand in Rhuidean was really good for me, I loved piecing together the history instead of having it told to me in one go.
But my God, if they’re all like this, I’m going to struggle to finish this. I hear Sanderson is better, but that’s a good 2 million words away…