England side for the Barbarians game
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
England side for the Barbarians game
Now we know the outcome of the semi-finals, I thought it might be worth having a think about who should feature against the Barbarians.
I’d go for:
1. B. Obano
2. T. Dunn
3. W. Stuart
4. D. Ribbans
5. E. Stooke
6. M. Wilson (captain)
7. B. Earl
8. A. Dombrandt
9. B. Spencer
10. M. Smith
11. R. McConnochie
12. C. Redpath
13. J. Marchant
14. O. Thorley
15. M. Malins
16. J. Singleton 17. L. Boyce 18. J. Heyes 19. A. Moon 20. T. Hill 21. A. Mitchell 22. O. Lawrence 23. J. Cokanasiga
Not much point in playing guys we already know lots about. Wilson would be an ideal leader for this side IMO.
*Edited to include Worcester players
I’d go for:
1. B. Obano
2. T. Dunn
3. W. Stuart
4. D. Ribbans
5. E. Stooke
6. M. Wilson (captain)
7. B. Earl
8. A. Dombrandt
9. B. Spencer
10. M. Smith
11. R. McConnochie
12. C. Redpath
13. J. Marchant
14. O. Thorley
15. M. Malins
16. J. Singleton 17. L. Boyce 18. J. Heyes 19. A. Moon 20. T. Hill 21. A. Mitchell 22. O. Lawrence 23. J. Cokanasiga
Not much point in playing guys we already know lots about. Wilson would be an ideal leader for this side IMO.
*Edited to include Worcester players
Last edited by Scrumhead on Sun Oct 11, 2020 8:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Puja
- Posts: 17833
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
I'd be generally in agreement with that, although I don't see the value in Jack Singleton on the bench. I'd prefer to start Mitchell and maybe get Harry Randall involved to ward off the attentions of Wales, but otherwise, I think you've got that spot on.Scrumhead wrote:Now we know the outcome of the semi-finals, I thought it might be worth having a think about who should feature against the Barbarians.
I’d go for:
1. B. Obano
2. T. Dunn
3. W. Stuart
4. D. Ribbans
5. E. Stooke
6. M. Wilson (captain)
7. B. Earl
8. A. Dombrandt
9. B. Spencer
10. M. Smith
11. R. McConnochie
12. C. Redpath
13. J. Marchant
14. O. Thorley
15. M. Malins
16. J. Singleton 17. L. Boyce 18. J. Heyes 19. A. Moon 20. J. Clement 21. A. Mitchell 22. F. Dingwall 23. J. Cokanasiga
Not much point in playing guys we already know lots about. Wilson would be an ideal leader for this side IMO.
I reckon Uncle Eddie will pick his first XV minus Exeter and Wasps players though.
Puja
ETA. On second thoughts, I'd say Cokanasiga *must* start this game. If we want to use him at all this autumn/winter, he needs minutes in his legs and some semblance of match-fitness and I'd say getting 80 minutes into him would be the most important thing that could come out of this game.
Backist Monk
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Is Earl living up to expectation in recent games?
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
I’m not so sure ... he looked finished after about 50mins today. I think he’d be more value off the bench right now.Puja wrote:I'd be generally in agreement with that, although I don't see the value in Jack Singleton on the bench. I'd prefer to start Mitchell and maybe get Harry Randall involved to ward off the attentions of Wales, but otherwise, I think you've got that spot on.Scrumhead wrote:Now we know the outcome of the semi-finals, I thought it might be worth having a think about who should feature against the Barbarians.
I’d go for:
1. B. Obano
2. T. Dunn
3. W. Stuart
4. D. Ribbans
5. E. Stooke
6. M. Wilson (captain)
7. B. Earl
8. A. Dombrandt
9. B. Spencer
10. M. Smith
11. R. McConnochie
12. C. Redpath
13. J. Marchant
14. O. Thorley
15. M. Malins
16. J. Singleton 17. L. Boyce 18. J. Heyes 19. A. Moon 20. J. Clement 21. A. Mitchell 22. F. Dingwall 23. J. Cokanasiga
Not much point in playing guys we already know lots about. Wilson would be an ideal leader for this side IMO.
I reckon Uncle Eddie will pick his first XV minus Exeter and Wasps players though.
Puja
ETA. On second thoughts, I'd say Cokanasiga *must* start this game. If we want to use him at all this autumn/winter, he needs minutes in his legs and some semblance of match-fitness and I'd say getting 80 minutes into him would be the most important thing that could come out of this game.
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yes. Of course he has? He was a bit anonymous today, but I think you could say the same for a good chunk of the Bristol side. Other than that, I’d say he’s been the best of the rest after Willis who has been in a category of his own.Oakboy wrote:Is Earl living up to expectation in recent games?
- Puja
- Posts: 17833
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Probably in terms of the Barbarians game, but who really cares if he's below par for a Barbarians friendly? If it gets him into decent enough nick to be in the XXIII for Italy, then it's worth it.Scrumhead wrote:I’m not so sure ... he looked finished after about 50mins today. I think he’d be more value off the bench right now.Puja wrote:ETA. On second thoughts, I'd say Cokanasiga *must* start this game. If we want to use him at all this autumn/winter, he needs minutes in his legs and some semblance of match-fitness and I'd say getting 80 minutes into him would be the most important thing that could come out of this game.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yeah - that’s fair. Given limitations on travel and quarantine, I imagine options for the Barbarians will be limited. I also read elsewhere that players who have played in the Premiership this season and will be playing next season can’t be selected because for the Barbarians of the tight turnaround. May or may not be true.
If it is true, I could imagine Barritt and Wigglesworth being in the squad as well as Robshaw - old England vs. new England if you will.
I also agree re. Singleton, but I went with players included in the training squad.
I forgot about the Worcester players so I’d swap in Ted Hill for Clement and Lawrence for Dingwall.
If it is true, I could imagine Barritt and Wigglesworth being in the squad as well as Robshaw - old England vs. new England if you will.
I also agree re. Singleton, but I went with players included in the training squad.
I forgot about the Worcester players so I’d swap in Ted Hill for Clement and Lawrence for Dingwall.
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
I've really warmed to Malins in the last few games. He's playing like Alex Goode imagines he plays in his head. He's got a lot of pace, a gliding quality in his running and a bag of tricks as well. All depends on Eddie though, will it be wall to wall Daly or might he experiment with the unknown quantity that is Watson? We do look well stocked at wing these days.
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Malins has always had huge potential but he’s been unlucky with injuries and, like others before him, has probably been too loyal to Saracens. The loan move is a golden opportunity for him to show what he can do with regular game time.
As you say, he’s like Goode with more pace and flair. I think he’s what Eddie wanted from Daly, but is more naturally suited to that role. He has a similar style to Furbank too, but is significantly better.
As you say, he’s like Goode with more pace and flair. I think he’s what Eddie wanted from Daly, but is more naturally suited to that role. He has a similar style to Furbank too, but is significantly better.
-
- Posts: 5928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
I'm sure Farrell will be captain.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
I'd have him at 12 to help out Smith, I think that could work really nicely. Are the Bath and Briz players going to be available, though?fivepointer wrote:I'm sure Farrell will be captain.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
-
- Posts: 12245
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yeah this makes total sense. They need as much opportunity to reestablish themselves in the side before the serious games happen.fivepointer wrote:I'm sure Farrell will be captain.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
fivepointer wrote:I'm sure Farrell will be captain.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
That is going to be a constant theme for a year at least. I've already said I would not pick any Championship-based players but I accept that Jones will. It will really piss me off if he gives them game time because they are not match-sharp in games where the shirts should be going to younger players needing development.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:27 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
While that might apply to the 2021 6N games, that's not really applicable to this set of games is it? the Saracen's players have played as recently as any one outside of Exeter/Wasps/Bristol/Bath
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:45 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
If the players selected for the England team do not play well then surely they'll be dropped even if they are Saracens. It is accepted many, but not all, contributors to this Forum consider Owen Farrell is an exception to this rule!Oakboy wrote:fivepointer wrote:I'm sure Farrell will be captain.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
That is going to be a constant theme for a year at least. I've already said I would not pick any Championship-based players but I accept that Jones will. It will really piss me off if he gives them game time because they are not match-sharp in games where the shirts should be going to younger players needing development.
However, it is just possible these Saracen players could make an even more significant contribution to English rugby as they will be less fatigued than those selected from Premiership teams - as well as not carrying long term injuries.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yes, Banquo and others have made that point. Jones is a stubborn individual and I can imagine him saying 'Player X was magnificent for England the last time he played and that's all that counts'. One snag for me is that if Saracens have zero club form to define their playing standard where does that leave others who are playing in the cut-throat minefield of regular premiership? Is club form irrelevant for a whole year (or two if covid restrictions curtail promotion from the championship) for everyone or just Saracens? Should good or bad form just disappear from consideration?ExAviator wrote:If the players selected for the England team do not play well then surely they'll be dropped even if they are Saracens. It is accepted many, but not all, contributors to this Forum consider Owen Farrell is an exception to this rule!Oakboy wrote:fivepointer wrote:I'm sure Farrell will be captain.
Hasnt played in a while and needs a run out before the Italy game. Might see one or two other Saracens players involved too.
That is going to be a constant theme for a year at least. I've already said I would not pick any Championship-based players but I accept that Jones will. It will really piss me off if he gives them game time because they are not match-sharp in games where the shirts should be going to younger players needing development.
However, it is just possible these Saracen players could make an even more significant contribution to English rugby as they will be less fatigued than those selected from Premiership teams - as well as not carrying long term injuries.
It strikes me that, rather than sharing their club's punishment, Saracens players are gaining an advantage over their rivals for international shirts. That might sit right with some but it definitely does not with me.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
You're forgetting about an important factor here: this is an individual thing. It's all well and good saying all players should be treated equal, but a player who has been one of England's best (or their captain) and has a backlog of good performances (or petulant performances hyped into great ones) is going to get into the squad anyway. They can show their form on the training paddock.Oakboy wrote:Yes, Banquo and others have made that point. Jones is a stubborn individual and I can imagine him saying 'Player X was magnificent for England the last time he played and that's all that counts'. One snag for me is that if Saracens have zero club form to define their playing standard where does that leave others who are playing in the cut-throat minefield of regular premiership? Is club form irrelevant for a whole year (or two if covid restrictions curtail promotion from the championship) for everyone or just Saracens? Should good or bad form just disappear from consideration?ExAviator wrote:If the players selected for the England team do not play well then surely they'll be dropped even if they are Saracens. It is accepted many, but not all, contributors to this Forum consider Owen Farrell is an exception to this rule!Oakboy wrote:
That is going to be a constant theme for a year at least. I've already said I would not pick any Championship-based players but I accept that Jones will. It will really piss me off if he gives them game time because they are not match-sharp in games where the shirts should be going to younger players needing development.
However, it is just possible these Saracen players could make an even more significant contribution to English rugby as they will be less fatigued than those selected from Premiership teams - as well as not carrying long term injuries.
It strikes me that, rather than sharing their club's punishment, Saracens players are gaining an advantage over their rivals for international shirts. That might sit right with some but it definitely does not with me.
And the Sarries in contention are:
Mako - probably the world's best LHP
George - one of the best hookers in the world
Itoje - one of the best locks in the world
Billy - a player unlike any other we have
Farrell - teacher's pet
Daly - one of our best all round rugby players
We're not talking about Dunn, Genge, Ewels, Ludlam and McConnochie here, we're talking about some of the best players on offer for us (and our captain).
You treat it on a situation by situation basis, don't treat all players as the same.
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yep. I was about to post a very similar argument.
No team can afford to ignore 6 players of that quality. If the Championship season doesn’t happen/or doesn’t happen until next year, I suspect other measures will be put in place for them.
I can kind of imagine a situation similar to what Japan had with the Sunwolves prior to the RWC with the players from the national team effectively put on a different training plan. Obviously it’s a very different scenario when Nigel Wray is paying their wages but I could still see some kind of ‘exceptional circumstances’ deal being figured out.
No team can afford to ignore 6 players of that quality. If the Championship season doesn’t happen/or doesn’t happen until next year, I suspect other measures will be put in place for them.
I can kind of imagine a situation similar to what Japan had with the Sunwolves prior to the RWC with the players from the national team effectively put on a different training plan. Obviously it’s a very different scenario when Nigel Wray is paying their wages but I could still see some kind of ‘exceptional circumstances’ deal being figured out.
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yeah. You can make an argument (perhaps not a strong one in all instances) for most, if not all of those players having a shout at a world XVStom wrote: And the Sarries in contention are:
Mako - probably the world's best LHP
George - one of the best hookers in the world
Itoje - one of the best locks in the world
Billy - a player unlike any other we have
Farrell - teacher's pet
Daly - one of our best all round rugby players
We're not talking about Dunn, Genge, Ewels, Ludlam and McConnochie here, we're talking about some of the best players on offer for us (and our captain).
You treat it on a situation by situation basis, don't treat all players as the same.
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
World XV or not (and I reckon two of that list are), they are all implicated in cheating their way to success, and so I think should be consigned to a year in the wilderness.
-
- Posts: 3451
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Though I'm sure them playing for England was fine when we were in a world cup final..........
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Not really, to be honest. But once everything became public after the final, then I think that a line should be drawn somewhere. What's the difference between them in the Championship and guys in France? How can there be special circumstances for a punishment for guys cheating to get more money, yet if someone takes a legit pay check abroad they are ruled out?
Just my unpopular opinion.
Just my unpopular opinion.
-
- Posts: 3451
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Two different things. Or rather three. The playing abroad nonsense, which is largely nonsense IMO (in terms of them ineligible), playing in the champ (occasionally) and then a belief that the players should be punished.
I don't see the problem with playing playing in other leagues. Player release is always mooted, but that isn't insurmountable. I don't see why we would limit players ability to play abroad and experience different leagues.
Playing in the Champ, frankly who cares. If there is an issue in the above about their release then that isn't a problem in Champ rugby.
The players aren't punished. Regardless of people's opinions. The club is punished, not the players. Why should the players be punished when it is the club that has broken the rules?
I don't see the problem with playing playing in other leagues. Player release is always mooted, but that isn't insurmountable. I don't see why we would limit players ability to play abroad and experience different leagues.
Playing in the Champ, frankly who cares. If there is an issue in the above about their release then that isn't a problem in Champ rugby.
The players aren't punished. Regardless of people's opinions. The club is punished, not the players. Why should the players be punished when it is the club that has broken the rules?
- Puja
- Posts: 17833
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Right, mod announcement:
We are not having another thread devolve into whether the Saracens players have cheated or been complicit in fraud. It is not possible to tell whether the Saracens players were wicked villains cackling over their ill-gotten gains, or just ordinary people who just accepted a paycheque, assumed their employer knew what they were doing, and didn't interfere with what they were told was above board. You are allowed to have your own opinions on that, but you are not allowed to have that conversation here because it is a) inherently unprovable one way or the other, and b) going to end up with someone saying something that could get Hammy sued and the board shut down.
No more please.
Mod
We are not having another thread devolve into whether the Saracens players have cheated or been complicit in fraud. It is not possible to tell whether the Saracens players were wicked villains cackling over their ill-gotten gains, or just ordinary people who just accepted a paycheque, assumed their employer knew what they were doing, and didn't interfere with what they were told was above board. You are allowed to have your own opinions on that, but you are not allowed to have that conversation here because it is a) inherently unprovable one way or the other, and b) going to end up with someone saying something that could get Hammy sued and the board shut down.
No more please.
Mod
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12245
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England side for the Barbarians game
Yes but Stuart, Dunn, Hill, Willis, Simmonds, McConnochie don't get to go up against them 1 and 1 in a Premiership game and say to Eddie "look, I'm at least as good as this guy". It's just a weird dynamic.Stom wrote:You're forgetting about an important factor here: this is an individual thing. It's all well and good saying all players should be treated equal, but a player who has been one of England's best (or their captain) and has a backlog of good performances (or petulant performances hyped into great ones) is going to get into the squad anyway. They can show their form on the training paddock.Oakboy wrote:Yes, Banquo and others have made that point. Jones is a stubborn individual and I can imagine him saying 'Player X was magnificent for England the last time he played and that's all that counts'. One snag for me is that if Saracens have zero club form to define their playing standard where does that leave others who are playing in the cut-throat minefield of regular premiership? Is club form irrelevant for a whole year (or two if covid restrictions curtail promotion from the championship) for everyone or just Saracens? Should good or bad form just disappear from consideration?ExAviator wrote:
If the players selected for the England team do not play well then surely they'll be dropped even if they are Saracens. It is accepted many, but not all, contributors to this Forum consider Owen Farrell is an exception to this rule!
However, it is just possible these Saracen players could make an even more significant contribution to English rugby as they will be less fatigued than those selected from Premiership teams - as well as not carrying long term injuries.
It strikes me that, rather than sharing their club's punishment, Saracens players are gaining an advantage over their rivals for international shirts. That might sit right with some but it definitely does not with me.
And the Sarries in contention are:
Mako - probably the world's best LHP
George - one of the best hookers in the world
Itoje - one of the best locks in the world
Billy - a player unlike any other we have
Farrell - teacher's pet
Daly - one of our best all round rugby players
We're not talking about Dunn, Genge, Ewels, Ludlam and McConnochie here, we're talking about some of the best players on offer for us (and our captain).
You treat it on a situation by situation basis, don't treat all players as the same.
It does sort of make you wonder how far the Saracens guys will be allowed to play under their normal level in the Championship. Sarries seem pretty great at motivating their players, but it might be funny if we start seeing clips surface of Owen Farrell getting gassed by a 43 year old Hugo Ellis every week.