Page 1 of 1
Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:06 pm
by FKAS
Bulls: Le Roux; Arendse, Gans, Kriel, Moodie; Goosen, Papier; Steenekamp, Van der Merwe, W Louw, Swanepoel, Ludwig, Van Staden, E Louw (capt), Hanekom.
Replacements: Wessels, Matanzima, Smith, Slabbert, Coetzee, Burger, Van der Walt, Petersen.
Saracens: Goode; Lewington, Daly, Tompkins, Maitland; Farrell (capt), Van Zyl; Ma Vunipola, George, Clarey, Itoje, Tizard, Gonzalez, Christie, B Vunipola.
Replacements: Dan, West, Judge, McFarland, Knight, Davies, Hartley, Cinti.
With both sides naming strong teams this really should be a brutally entertaining game.
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:41 pm
by Banquo
FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Bulls: Le Roux; Arendse, Gans, Kriel, Moodie; Goosen, Papier; Steenekamp, Van der Merwe, W Louw, Swanepoel, Ludwig, Van Staden, E Louw (capt), Hanekom.
Replacements: Wessels, Matanzima, Smith, Slabbert, Coetzee, Burger, Van der Walt, Petersen.
Saracens: Goode; Lewington, Daly, Tompkins, Maitland; Farrell (capt), Van Zyl; Ma Vunipola, George, Clarey, Itoje, Tizard, Gonzalez, Christie, B Vunipola.
Replacements: Dan, West, Judge, McFarland, Knight, Davies, Hartley, Cinti.
With both sides naming strong teams this really should be a brutally entertaining game.
Sarries bench continues to look a little short
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:27 pm
by FKAS
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:41 pm
FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Bulls: Le Roux; Arendse, Gans, Kriel, Moodie; Goosen, Papier; Steenekamp, Van der Merwe, W Louw, Swanepoel, Ludwig, Van Staden, E Louw (capt), Hanekom.
Replacements: Wessels, Matanzima, Smith, Slabbert, Coetzee, Burger, Van der Walt, Petersen.
Saracens: Goode; Lewington, Daly, Tompkins, Maitland; Farrell (capt), Van Zyl; Ma Vunipola, George, Clarey, Itoje, Tizard, Gonzalez, Christie, B Vunipola.
Replacements: Dan, West, Judge, McFarland, Knight, Davies, Hartley, Cinti.
With both sides naming strong teams this really should be a brutally entertaining game.
Sarries bench continues to look a little short
Dunno McFarland, Knight, Hartley and Cinti are all 6ft3 plus. Pretty tall really.
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:41 pm
by Banquo
FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:27 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:41 pm
FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Bulls: Le Roux; Arendse, Gans, Kriel, Moodie; Goosen, Papier; Steenekamp, Van der Merwe, W Louw, Swanepoel, Ludwig, Van Staden, E Louw (capt), Hanekom.
Replacements: Wessels, Matanzima, Smith, Slabbert, Coetzee, Burger, Van der Walt, Petersen.
Saracens: Goode; Lewington, Daly, Tompkins, Maitland; Farrell (capt), Van Zyl; Ma Vunipola, George, Clarey, Itoje, Tizard, Gonzalez, Christie, B Vunipola.
Replacements: Dan, West, Judge, McFarland, Knight, Davies, Hartley, Cinti.
With both sides naming strong teams this really should be a brutally entertaining game.
Sarries bench continues to look a little short
Dunno McFarland, Knight, Hartley and Cinti are all 6ft3 plus. Pretty tall really.
I was wondering who would come up with that gem
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:45 pm
by Peej
Is Tom Willis injured?
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 5:43 pm
by Banquo
unbelievable- Bulls player foot in touch....no one sees it. bizarre, like the 70s reffing
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 6:54 pm
by morepork
Saracens are comically cynical.
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:18 pm
by p/d
What was Billy carded for?
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:20 pm
by morepork
Cleared out someone with a shoulder to the face.
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:28 pm
by FKAS
morepork wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:20 pm
Cleared out someone with a shoulder to the face.
Comically cack handed attempt at a clearout. Got past the ball then face planted the floor with shoulder to the head if the Bulls player on the way down.
Sarries played much better without him.
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 1:55 am
by Danno
You love to see it (not the foul play)
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:42 pm
by Banquo
?
Thought it was cut and dried- I didn't see it
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:54 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:42 pm
?
Thought it was cut and dried- I didn't see it
It wasn't outrageous - he came in low to a ruck, but threw himself off his feet over the top and clipped someone in the face on the way through. Not hugely surprised that it's downgraded, although can definitely see the rationale for red.
Puja
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:40 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:54 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:42 pm
?
Thought it was cut and dried- I didn't see it
It wasn't outrageous - he came in low to a ruck, but threw himself off his feet over the top and clipped someone in the face on the way through. Not hugely surprised that it's downgraded, although can definitely see the rationale for red.
Puja
hmm. Seen it now.
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:47 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:40 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:54 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:42 pm
?
Thought it was cut and dried- I didn't see it
It wasn't outrageous - he came in low to a ruck, but threw himself off his feet over the top and clipped someone in the face on the way through. Not hugely surprised that it's downgraded, although can definitely see the rationale for red.
Puja
hmm. Seen it now.
Have you a link? I've only seen it once - and I take it from your hmm that you disagree with my summary, so I wouldn't mind another look.
Puja
Re: Bulls Vs Sarries
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2023 7:00 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:47 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:40 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:54 pm
It wasn't outrageous - he came in low to a ruck, but threw himself off his feet over the top and clipped someone in the face on the way through. Not hugely surprised that it's downgraded, although can definitely see the rationale for red.
Puja
hmm. Seen it now.
Have you a link? I've only seen it once - and I take it from your hmm that you disagree with my summary, so I wouldn't mind another look.
Puja
not disagreeing with summary but on field decision and conequnce- clip was on twitter