RugbyRebels

Donny osmond wrote:.. Are all dominated by hysteria mongers telling us how the world is going to hell in a hand basket and anyone who disagrees is "stupid" BUT at the same time the far right neoliberal/neocon administrators of rugby rebels are actively denying them their god given right to monger hysteria, er I mean speech.

Who said this place was dead?



Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:.. Are all dominated by hysteria mongers telling us how the world is going to hell in a hand basket and anyone who disagrees is "stupid" BUT at the same time the far right neoliberal/neocon administrators of rugby rebels are actively denying them their god given right to monger hysteria, er I mean speech.

Who said this place was dead?



Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

You see our cunning censorship is so clever that we fail to censor any views whatsoever.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:.. Are all dominated by hysteria mongers telling us how the world is going to hell in a hand basket and anyone who disagrees is "stupid" BUT at the same time the far right neoliberal/neocon administrators of rugby rebels are actively denying them their god given right to monger hysteria, er I mean speech.

Who said this place was dead?



Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

You see our cunning censorship is so clever that we fail to censor any views whatsoever.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:.. Are all dominated by hysteria mongers telling us how the world is going to hell in a hand basket and anyone who disagrees is "stupid" BUT at the same time the far right neoliberal/neocon administrators of rugby rebels are actively denying them their god given right to monger hysteria, er I mean speech.

Who said this place was dead?



Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

You see our cunning censorship is so clever that we fail to censor any views whatsoever.

UGagain wrote:The modding on this board is a fucking disgrace.

We've got mods overtly cuddling up to posters that are hurling vile abuse at posters for their political views.

Which Tyler wrote:

UGagain wrote:The modding on this board is a fucking disgrace.

We've got mods overtly cuddling up to posters that are hurling vile abuse at posters for their political views.

I must admit - I'd not noticed many mod,s cuddling up to you.

UGagain wrote:

Which Tyler wrote:

UGagain wrote:The modding on this board is a fucking disgrace.

We've got mods overtly cuddling up to posters that are hurling vile abuse at posters for their political views.

I must admit - I'd not noticed many mod,s cuddling up to you.

Oh how witty.


Were you censured for your gratuitous attacks on me?

Of course not. They encouraged you.

Just like Eugene encourages Cashead and Donny Osmond when they make their personal attacks.

You're a clique of WASP males who don't want their privilege questioned.

UGagain wrote:

Which Tyler wrote:

UGagain wrote:The modding on this board is a fucking disgrace.

We've got mods overtly cuddling up to posters that are hurling vile abuse at posters for their political views.

I must admit - I'd not noticed many mod,s cuddling up to you.

Were you censured for your gratuitous attacks on me?

Of course not. They encouraged you.

Just like Eugene encourages Cashead and Donny Osmond when they make their personal attacks.

You're a clique of WASP males who don't want their privilege questioned.

Which Tyler wrote:

UGagain wrote:

Which Tyler wrote: I must admit - I'd not noticed many mod,s cuddling up to you.

Were you censured for your gratuitous attacks on me?

Of course not. They encouraged you.

Just like Eugene encourages Cashead and Donny Osmond when they make their personal attacks.

You're a clique of WASP males who don't want their privilege questioned.

Do have memory difficulties? I've not made any gratuitous attacks on you (possible exception in this post) contrarily, you've made several gratuitous attacks on me for having the temerity to point out your self-contradictions.
In the above post, you yet again claim to know everything about me, whilst knowing absolutely nothing whatsoever - it's just your go-to assumption for anyone who doesn't worship at your feet.

UGagain wrote:Dude, you're obviously appealing to the audience. You made a gratuitous attack on me and now you're making ridiculous strawman arguments.

One wonders as to the average IQ around here sometimes.

UGagain wrote:

Which Tyler wrote:

UGagain wrote:

Were you censured for your gratuitous attacks on me?

Of course not. They encouraged you.

Just like Eugene encourages Cashead and Donny Osmond when they make their personal attacks.

You're a clique of WASP males who don't want their privilege questioned.

Do have memory difficulties? I've not made any gratuitous attacks on you (possible exception in this post) contrarily, you've made several gratuitous attacks on me for having the temerity to point out your self-contradictions.
In the above post, you yet again claim to know everything about me, whilst knowing absolutely nothing whatsoever - it's just your go-to assumption for anyone who doesn't worship at your feet.

Dude, you're obviously appealing to the audience. You made a gratuitous attack on me and now you're making ridiculous strawman arguments.

One wonders as to the average IQ around here sometimes.

UGagain wrote:You and your ilk argue like children.

And 'argue' is really overstating what you do.

You whine.

Which Tyler wrote:

UGagain wrote:Dude, you're obviously appealing to the audience. You made a gratuitous attack on me and now you're making ridiculous strawman arguments.

One wonders as to the average IQ around here sometimes.

Go for it - quote me 1 gratuitous attack on you, from me.

For that matter, quote me 1 single strawman argument from me.

You have a quote function - use it, man up; quote or retract. I've engaged with you approximately 3 times ever - so it really shouldn't take long.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

UGagain wrote:

Which Tyler wrote: Do have memory difficulties? I've not made any gratuitous attacks on you (possible exception in this post) contrarily, you've made several gratuitous attacks on me for having the temerity to point out your self-contradictions.
In the above post, you yet again claim to know everything about me, whilst knowing absolutely nothing whatsoever - it's just your go-to assumption for anyone who doesn't worship at your feet.

Dude, you're obviously appealing to the audience. You made a gratuitous attack on me and now you're making ridiculous strawman arguments.

One wonders as to the average IQ around here sometimes.

Please don't take this as any sort of response, I just wanted to quote this for my own amusement.

UGagain wrote:You and your ilk argue like children.

And 'argue' is really overstating what you do.

You whine.

Sandydragon wrote:This thread is under review. Locked until further notice.

Len wrote:Rugby rebels is back bitches. Somebody invite Hadrian, Hwntw and Madashton back to level the playing field against these liberal overlords.

Sandydragon wrote:

Len wrote:Rugby rebels is back bitches. Somebody invite Hadrian, Hwntw and Madashton back to level the playing field against these liberal overlords.

Can a Liberal be an overlord? Surely more of a facilitator?

morepork wrote:

Sandydragon wrote:This thread is under review. Locked until further notice.

Yeah. I don't really see the need for that.