Now imagine one with Genge, LCD and Sinkler16th man wrote:Imagine an England front row of Genge, Hartley and Sinckler.
Or Genge, George and Sinkler
Or Genge Taylor and Sinkler
Or even Genge, Dunn and Sinkler - he's having a good game today
Moderator: Puja
Now imagine one with Genge, LCD and Sinkler16th man wrote:Imagine an England front row of Genge, Hartley and Sinckler.
How dare you, you've come to the wrong placeWhich Tyler wrote:Fair enough, I was thinking of their ability to play rugby
Yup, bludgeoned us into submission, and only really went fast once our heads had dropped.fivepointer wrote:Tigers too good.
Built on the predictable scrum dominance and battered a willing but outgunned Bath.
Just now they look a very tough outfit. Play offs await.
Yeah,....him and Fort-alley.p/d wrote:Has Kitchener always been a South African called Kirchner?
Well, there wasn't much for Grayson to comment about. It was definitely a game for the frontrow purist.Tigersman wrote:Grayson was crap as a pundit IMO.
Flats class as usual though.
Hoping considering he came on at 16-15 with 20 to go i'm hoping it shows he is trusted.Mellsblue wrote:Lets hope he gets an extended run during what’s left of the season.
Bath could've not gone down. You generally have a choice in a scrum, even if you're outclassed - go back or go down (or out or around, anything to avoid a straight shove).16th man wrote:This so much. What were Bath supposed to do in that situation? Especially as Tigers could probably have scored that try from any of the previous 3 scrums if they'd chosen to play the ball rather than milk a penalty.Which Tyler wrote:I do hate that not being as good as your opponent is considered a penalty and cardable offence