Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
fivepointer
Posts: 5913
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by fivepointer »

2 well matched sides. Should be a competitive fixture. Graham starts for Newcastle and is a little lucky to escape a citing after last week.

Gloucester: Woodward; Marshall, Twelvetrees, Atkinson, Trinder; Burns, Braley; McAllister, Matu'u, Balmain; Slater (capt), Galarza; Ackermann, Polledri, Morgan.

Replacements: Hanson, Hohneck, Afoa, Clarke, Ludlow, Vellacott, Symons, Sharples.

Newcastle: Hammersley; Harris, Mermoz, Matavesi, Kibirige; Hodgson, Young (capt); Lockwood, Lawson, Wilson, Green, Robinson, Olmstead, Graham, Burrows.

Replacements: Socino, Vickers, Davison, Witty, Wilson, Stuart, Radwan, Penny.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Puja »

fivepointer wrote:2 well matched sides. Should be a competitive fixture. Graham starts for Newcastle and is a little lucky to escape a citing after last week.
Jesus - hadn't noticed he'd escaped completely scot-free (no pun intended). The random wheel of justice is spun again...

Ideally we want an English winner of this comp as the confluence of events means that it'd likely result in a 7th English qualifier for the ERC. Who do we think is the most likely to win the final from these two?

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Oakboy »

I can't really explain why but I find Newcastle more convincing than Gloucester when it matters. The collective power of the team unit just seems a greater force somehow.
twitchy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by twitchy »

Newcastle in top form but glos at home, should be a cracker I reckon. Crowd should be in good voice in the sunshine as well.
twitchy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by twitchy »

:o The ref got nailed.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Raggs »

Glaws have some exciting players, but so much of their play seems to simply rely on size and power. Powerful carriers in the pack, 2 huge centres, and then an exciting back 3. Very effective of course, but not the most delicate, suspect it could get found out against the French sides in the champions cup.
twitchy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by twitchy »

Newcastle missing goneva and sinoti.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Puja »

Oakboy wrote:I can't really explain why but I find Newcastle more convincing than Gloucester when it matters. The collective power of the team unit just seems a greater force somehow.
Newcastle are definitely playing well above the sum of their parts, but they don't have the quality of the teams around them. Hopefully they can make another good showing next season and start to get some higher quality imports in that some of the journeymen they have currently.

Having said that, Olmstead's been excellent at 6 the last few weeks.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Gloskarlos »

33-12 says it all. Glos at home are a different proposition.

Bilbao here we come
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:I can't really explain why but I find Newcastle more convincing than Gloucester when it matters. The collective power of the team unit just seems a greater force somehow.
...or...

great win for Glaws.
fivepointer
Posts: 5913
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by fivepointer »

Glos the better side and good winners. Newcastle minus Sinoti and Goneva are not quite the same proposition.

Enjoyed some of Glos play in the backs. 12T looks a different player and Woodward is a strong running FB. Slater makes a real difference for them up front. Really solid, consistent performer. Too late for England?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:I can't really explain why but I find Newcastle more convincing than Gloucester when it matters. The collective power of the team unit just seems a greater force somehow.
...or...

great win for Glaws.
Wrong . . . Again. I thought last night Gloucester were better than I thought they could be.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Oakboy »

Puja wrote:
Oakboy wrote:I can't really explain why but I find Newcastle more convincing than Gloucester when it matters. The collective power of the team unit just seems a greater force somehow.
Newcastle are definitely playing well above the sum of their parts, but they don't have the quality of the teams around them. Hopefully they can make another good showing next season and start to get some higher quality imports in that some of the journeymen they have currently.

Having said that, Olmstead's been excellent at 6 the last few weeks.

Puja
Maybe a higher AP position will do them more good?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Puja »

Oakboy wrote:
Puja wrote:
Oakboy wrote:I can't really explain why but I find Newcastle more convincing than Gloucester when it matters. The collective power of the team unit just seems a greater force somehow.
Newcastle are definitely playing well above the sum of their parts, but they don't have the quality of the teams around them. Hopefully they can make another good showing next season and start to get some higher quality imports in that some of the journeymen they have currently.

Having said that, Olmstead's been excellent at 6 the last few weeks.

Puja
Maybe a higher AP position will do them more good?
They don't seem to have signed many improvements for next season though. Mulipola's solid, but that's it. I have faith in Richards and Walder to keep getting a quart out of a pint bottle though and hopefully sustained success will make then more attractive to future signings.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Digby »

I assume Falcons are already burning a lot of money they don't have, so more than Richards working with his squad someone needs to sign off on accepting losses as they are continuing, and even the losses getting worse
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Mellsblue »

They lose £2mil a year, I believe.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Glos V Falcons Challenge Cup SF Fri 7.45

Post by Galfon »

Meanwhile Blues beating Pau puts Glaws into the 'Champs' Cup next year...that will bring a few extra bob their way.. :)
Post Reply