Leinster v Scarlets

Moderator: Sandydragon

Post Reply
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Numbers »

Well the teams are out, Scarlets starting Patchell at 15:

Leinster:

15.Kearney 14.McFadden 13.Ringrose 12.Henshaw 11.Nacewa 10.Sexton(C) 9.Gibson-Park 1.Healy 2.Cronin 3.Furlong 4.Toner 5.Ryan 6.Fardy 7.Leavy 8.Murphy

Reps: Tracy, McGrath, Porter, Molony, Conan, McCarthy, Carberry, Larmour

Scarlets:

15.Patchell 14.Halfpenny 13.Williams 12.Parkes 11.Evans 10.Jones 9.Davies 1.Evans 2.Owens(C) 3.Lee 4.Beirne 5.Bulbring 6.Shingler 7.Davies 8.Barclay
Reps: Elias, Evans, Kruger, Rawlins, Cummins, Davies, Hughes, Boyd

Interesting selection.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by kk67 »

Sounds pretty tense on the radio. Is that Jerome with the whistle...?.
Poite......well,...he's giving loads of information to the players in-play.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7517
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by morepork »

Leinster squeezing Scarlets like a tube of toothpaste.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by kk67 »

Nacewa squeezes the tube any way he wants.
wayneha50
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:33 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by wayneha50 »

That was absolutely brutal.
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Ye could have turned up for the second half, at least!
Idle Feck
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4964
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Ouch. It's like a different game in the KO stages.
User avatar
Sourdust
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Sourdust »

This is what we mean when we talk about Irish teams being "boring" - it's a back-handed compliment really.

That was as boring a game of rugby as you could ever see. If one side is simply not allowed to touch the ball, there's no contest, there's just a procession. Ireland and Leinster now play this utterly suffocating game wherein they simply keep the ball forever, and just fall over the line when they happen to be near it. It's hugely impressive on a technical level, and I certainly don't expect any Irish fans to apologise for winning; but for the rest of us, whether victim or neutral, it's just supremely irritating. I'd be in favour of any law changes which made it harder to do what they do, so we can actually have a match.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by WaspInWales »

Sourdust wrote:This is what we mean when we talk about Irish teams being "boring" - it's a back-handed compliment really.

That was as boring a game of rugby as you could ever see. If one side is simply not allowed to touch the ball, there's no contest, there's just a procession. Ireland and Leinster now play this utterly suffocating game wherein they simply keep the ball forever, and just fall over the line when they happen to be near it. It's hugely impressive on a technical level, and I certainly don't expect any Irish fans to apologise for winning; but for the rest of us, whether victim or neutral, it's just supremely irritating. I'd be in favour of any law changes which made it harder to do what they do, so we can actually have a match.
6 tackles each then?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7517
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by morepork »

You could start with the kicking strategy. Some of the Scarlets kicking from hand was terrible.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by kk67 »

Sourdust wrote:This is what we mean when we talk about Irish teams being "boring" - it's a back-handed compliment really.

That was as boring a game of rugby as you could ever see. If one side is simply not allowed to touch the ball, there's no contest, there's just a procession. Ireland and Leinster now play this utterly suffocating game wherein they simply keep the ball forever, and just fall over the line when they happen to be near it. It's hugely impressive on a technical level, and I certainly don't expect any Irish fans to apologise for winning; but for the rest of us, whether victim or neutral, it's just supremely irritating. I'd be in favour of any law changes which made it harder to do what they do, so we can actually have a match.
Yup. Teams that seek technicality as a given usually prosper.

At the least, trying to cheat is not their default game,.... like the English.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4964
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

I didn't see the match. Does anyone think having Patchell at 10 would have made much difference?
paddy no 11
Posts: 1883
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by paddy no 11 »

Watch Scott Fardy at rucks.....he cheats a lot in fact all the time
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Spiffy »

paddy no 11 wrote:Watch Scott Fardy at rucks.....he cheats a lot in fact all the time
Everyone cheats at rucks. Crafty players will push it to the limit and see what they can get away with. It is part and parcel of the game. None better than Ritchie McCaw.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7517
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by morepork »

Spiffy wrote:
paddy no 11 wrote:Watch Scott Fardy at rucks.....he cheats a lot in fact all the time
Everyone cheats at rucks. Crafty players will push it to the limit and see what they can get away with. It is part and parcel of the game. None better than Ritchie McCaw.

Racist.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by WaspInWales »

It's not cheating if the ref doesn't see it.

If the ref sees it, he's either cheating or a homer...or both.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Numbers »

A replica of the Ireland v Wales game without the consolation tries at the end, fair play to Leinster they strangled the life out of us and we couldn't contest the breakdown.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10466
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Sandydragon »

A few seasons ago there was much complaining over jackling and how differing refs were interpreting the breakdown differently. There was also a widely shared perspective that the defence was on top on many games.

The law interpretation has changed and now the attack has the advantage. But this leaves teams struggling to get the ball when one side are very disciplined.

Scarlets, and Wales, either need to win with 30% of the ball and resolute defending, or they need to find a way to get hold of the ball.

Not kicking stupidly would be a start though for both teams.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by kk67 »

WaspInWales wrote:It's not cheating if the ref doesn't see it.
If the ref sees it, he's either cheating or a homer...or both.
Aye... it's a minefield.
User avatar
Sourdust
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Leinster v Scarlets

Post by Sourdust »

It's cheating if it's cheating. If the officials don't see it, that's a problem with them, or the laws. It's not the fault of the side who aren't cheating, or aren't cheating as well as the other cheats.

For the record I didn't think that much of what Leinster did to Scarlets was cheating - they have become supremely good at utilizing current laws in a disciplined fashion. My complaint is that once this becomes possible, laws surely need to change. Ireland v Wales was different inasmuch as nearly everyone not wearing green saw one side blatantly and consistently breaking the laws without redress. If what Ireland did that day was actually perfectly legal, where are all the inevitable smartarse YouTube videos showing how we're all wrong? :-)
Post Reply