Trump
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
That's a pretty specific theoretical MPmorepork wrote:Mike Pence looks like he would enjoy getting wanked off by a young farm labourer whilst being choked with a silk tie.
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Trump
I guess it's the colonial equivalent of hanging from the ceiling with an orange in your mouth...WaspInWales wrote:That's a pretty specific theoretical MPmorepork wrote:Mike Pence looks like he would enjoy getting wanked off by a young farm labourer whilst being choked with a silk tie.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Trump
I believe Pence refers to it as tickling the tabernackle
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
As America hurtles toward outright white supremism, the President deflects by going full retard and announces an intent to create a "Space Force" as a distinct arm of the military. I quote, “We are going to have a space force,” Trump said in Washington D.C. “An Air Force and a Space Force. Separate, but equal.”
I shit you not.
I shit you not.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
I bet he assigns a certain Commander B. Lightyear as the man in charge of the operation as he's heard great things about him, great, great things and he will do a good job for us.morepork wrote:As America hurtles toward outright white supremism, the President deflects by going full retard and announces an intent to create a "Space Force" as a distinct arm of the military. I quote, “We are going to have a space force,” Trump said in Washington D.C. “An Air Force and a Space Force. Separate, but equal.”
I shit you not.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Trump
Donald Lightyear
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
Digby wrote:Has he spoken on whether it locks in the USA as the #1 military nation or will simply hasten a space arms race?
I think an industry lobbyist showed him some stills from Thunderbirds, and he was all too willing to hand over squillions in taxpayer money. If he looks like getting cold feet they have some actual props from the second Terminator movie. Donel has a real good handle of stuff to do with space, as he demonstrated last year:
“At some point in the future, we’re going to look back and say how did we do it without space?”
A government "Space Counsel" is chaired by renowned astrophysicist and intelligent design sexual deviant, Mike Pence, who Donel has previously said is "really into space".
What a champion.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
Probably got his words mixed up again...he meant cavities.morepork wrote:A government "Space Counsel" is chaired by renowned astrophysicist and intelligent design sexual deviant, Mike Pence, who Donel has previously said is "really into space".
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Trump
I take it that Fox ran an advert for Solo approximatley 3 minutes before the tweet?morepork wrote:As America hurtles toward outright white supremism, the President deflects by going full retard and announces an intent to create a "Space Force" as a distinct arm of the military. I quote, “We are going to have a space force,” Trump said in Washington D.C. “An Air Force and a Space Force. Separate, but equal.”
I shit you not.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Trump
Nah, don't be silly.Digby wrote:Has anyone told him he'd get a much bigger return if he spent just 20% of the money and gave it to NASA not the military?
A] NASA don't like guns
B} Actually, NASA doesn't really like anyting that explodes.
C] Nasa keep trying to tell his the world is the wrong shape; but he's never falled off the planet, so it must be flat!
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3222
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?Coco wrote:Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.Digby wrote:Having to say nice things about Trump Vs dying in a nuclear war..., I think a lot of people might be on the fence about that one. At the very least any praise will be highly qualified that he remains a fat, ignorant, odious piece of shit, and an incredibly stupid piece of shit at that, I would allow he's very orange as far as shit goes.Coco wrote:Well I hope he can do/initiate/negotiate something everyone can get behind.
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10520
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
Splitting up families like they have is a fucking disgrace. It sounds very much like the authorities are failing in their duty of care to those children.Mellsblue wrote:
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: RE: Re: Trump
I'm sure some of his core supporting group are well up for it.Donny osmond wrote:Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?Coco wrote:Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.Digby wrote:
Having to say nice things about Trump Vs dying in a nuclear war..., I think a lot of people might be on the fence about that one. At the very least any praise will be highly qualified that he remains a fat, ignorant, odious piece of shit, and an incredibly stupid piece of shit at that, I would allow he's very orange as far as shit goes.
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
Ann Coulter is a real piece of work though.
However, it seems to have caused quite a stir and backlash with some Republicans too.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
As if sticking kids in cages wasn't enough to win the hearts and minds of everyone, Trump has withdrawn the US from the UN Human Rights Council on account of it being biased:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
Irony much?
Yet again, it seems Trump is doing Bibi's bidding.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
Irony much?
Yet again, it seems Trump is doing Bibi's bidding.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Trump
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
Oh, and hidden amongst this message https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
US have quite the UN Council on Human Rights... due to their "chronic anti-Isreal bias" (AKA literally letting Israel get away with murder)
ETA: Ninja.d "another post has been made..."
oh no, they're duty, as coming from above, is to make life as miserable as possible. IIRC some of the "regimes" children have been placed with known human traffickers (AKA "slavers")Sandydragon wrote:Splitting up families like they have is a fucking disgrace. It sounds very much like the authorities are failing in their duty of care to those children.Mellsblue wrote:
Oh, and hidden amongst this message https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
US have quite the UN Council on Human Rights... due to their "chronic anti-Isreal bias" (AKA literally letting Israel get away with murder)
ETA: Ninja.d "another post has been made..."
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
WaspInWales wrote:As if sticking kids in cages wasn't enough to win the hearts and minds of everyone, Trump has withdrawn the US from the UN Human Rights Council on account of it being biased:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/44537372
Irony much?
Yet again, it seems Trump is doing Bibi's bidding.
Fucking hell. 'Murrica is going to have to dig hard to clear this smear. As will these complicit genital warts that promote it. Military contracts seem a common point of focus. As does the dogma of white people. The narrative is fucking grim here and I'm not proud to be involved by virtue of residence.
- Coco
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:21 am
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Very much so. What most people dont understand is that families that cross at a port of entry and claim asylum are not separated, as the parents have not crossed illegally or put their child/children in danger by doing so. There are at least 25 (i think?) ports of entry along our southern border. If you truly and legitimately want asylum for your family, there is no reason not to cross legally and get it done.Donny osmond wrote:Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?Coco wrote:Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.Digby wrote:
Having to say nice things about Trump Vs dying in a nuclear war..., I think a lot of people might be on the fence about that one. At the very least any praise will be highly qualified that he remains a fat, ignorant, odious piece of shit, and an incredibly stupid piece of shit at that, I would allow he's very orange as far as shit goes.
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
You understand that there are quite a few trafficked children that need protection, too. If it cannot be determined that a child belongs to or with the adults they crossed with, they take the child to a safer facility until it can be determined that the child belongs to the adult, and will be safe with them. Quite a few other factors are at play that get conveniently overlooked by main stream on both sides. Tossing your child in the trunk of a coyotes car to travel across the 118 degree desert with no water or guarantee they will be safe seems pretty dangerous and irresponsible.
It is not as simple as "they are ripping children out of their loving parents arms" Some of the so-called parents arent even related or known to the children...it is a very heartbreaking situation. Would you rather these adults just be allowed to take off with children they cannot prove are theirs? Would that make everyone feel better? Do you think it's safe for a lot of these children???
This narrative really pisses me off because 99% of people do not comprehend what is actually going on down here and cannot wrap their head around the possibility that while yes it is not ideal, and yes some legitimate families get temporarily separated, it is probably in the best interest of the children.
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3222
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trump
Ok so images and videos of children being kept in cages is being beamed around the world, and your answer is to speculate that it is stopping *some* illegal immigrants *some* of whom may or may not be the parents of those children. How many illegals is it stopping and is that pitifully small number really a justification for the actual mental torture being inflicted on those kids? For the record, the fact that some people may not be treating their kids right wouldnt usually count as justification for the fucking american government to also, deliberately, engage in equally abhorrent practise.Coco wrote:Very much so. What most people dont understand is that families that cross at a port of entry and claim asylum are not separated, as the parents have not crossed illegally or put their child/children in danger by doing so. There are at least 25 (i think?) ports of entry along our southern border. If you truly and legitimately want asylum for your family, there is no reason not to cross legally and get it done.Donny osmond wrote:Are many people getting behind him on the whole wrench-children-from-parents thing?Coco wrote:
Didn't really mean get behind "him"... meant hopefully something happens that will unite the majority of people in a positive way.
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
You understand that there are quite a few trafficked children that need protection, too. If it cannot be determined that a child belongs to or with the adults they crossed with, they take the child to a safer facility until it can be determined that the child belongs to the adult, and will be safe with them. Quite a few other factors are at play that get conveniently overlooked by main stream on both sides. Tossing your child in the trunk of a coyotes car to travel across the 118 degree desert with no water or guarantee they will be safe seems pretty dangerous and irresponsible.
It is not as simple as "they are ripping children out of their loving parents arms" Some of the so-called parents arent even related or known to the children...it is a very heartbreaking situation. Would you rather these adults just be allowed to take off with children they cannot prove are theirs? Would that make everyone feel better? Do you think it's safe for a lot of these children???
This narrative really pisses me off because 99% of people do not comprehend what is actually going on down here and cannot wrap their head around the possibility that while yes it is not ideal, and yes some legitimate families get temporarily separated, it is probably in the best interest of the children.
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.