The South American sweet potato has been prevalent in the Pacific Islands for about 1000 years, and is known to the Maori as the kumera, which closely resembles the word cumal which is still used by the Quechua natives of the Andes region. So there may well have been contact between Polynesians and South American natives long before Europeans arrived on the scene, and given the former were the ones who sailed their double-hulled canoes all over the Pacific, it's certainly possible they reached South America at some point but did not settle there, as there is no trace of their DNA on that continent.morepork wrote:I have to admit I am struggling to see the relevance of that criticism (irony context aside). Think this through. Anthropological studies hypothesise the existence of a novel branch of evolution, the members of which are long gone. Molecular biology and bioinformatics provide hard data supporting this, and each complements the other. What's the problem here? A contrasting example would be Thor Hyerdahl's theory of the populating of Polynesia citing the spread of Taro as a staple crop. He hypothesised Polynesians originated in South America based on Taro but subsequent analyses of Taro mitochondrial DNA showed this crop originated in Asia. Resolution through two independent points of observation.
But Thor was an ass who clung to his theories long after they had been disproved because his ego was more important to him than discovery of the truth.