




Moderator: morepork
rowan wrote:
rowan wrote:So you're bringing your redneck political views onto this thread now. In other words, this is about your own narrow-mindedness and juvenile bitchiness. Congratulations on your heroic lifestyle!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hes applying the ruling that Canta_brian is obviously a member of the White Power based on hes from the halfway down the Mainland so will share the political views of yer average white fella in Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky etc etc.. Well thats the only reason I can think.morepork wrote:rowan wrote:So you're bringing your redneck political views onto this thread now. In other words, this is about your own narrow-mindedness and juvenile bitchiness. Congratulations on your heroic lifestyle!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm sorry, what specific political views are contained within the post you quoted?
Do you think that? If so why?rowan wrote:Let's get back to the rugby. Who thinks this is true? Would it be better for the comp if someone aside from the Saders wins this year?
rowan wrote:
I did say in my post "Do you think that? If so why?" I never made any remark that you'd declared it. No wonder this board is going to the dogs, Ive asked you a question regarding your question and you come back with a snidey remark followed up with a decent response to my question. If you cut out the snidey shit people would probably treat you with a bit more respect but unfortunately you cant help yourself it seems. It used to be bloody great in days gone by with a decent mix across the board but now its left to just a few die hards and you.rowan wrote:It was a question, not a declaration, and I'm not the cartoonist. But since, unlike you, I can distinguish between a question and a declaration I'd say that it probably would be good for the comp to see another team win. Obviously I'm a Canes fan, because I grew up in that region and played my rugby there, but if they don't take it my second choice would be the Lions. A first-time winner is always enjoyable to see, and a South African victory might help to revive interest in that part of the world, where they seem to have grown a little weary of watching their teams coming off 2nd best to the Kiwis far more often than not. Same applies to the Aussies, of course, so my third choice would be the Tahs. Probably I'm going to be disappointed, however, as the Saders are overwhelming favorites. & if they win in style, so be it. I have nothing but admiration for Canterbury rugby, which is why I refer to them as the 'Real Madrid of rugby.'
The Chiefs finished third in their division. Third! The fact that the New Zealand division was clearly stronger than the others (this is a genuine problem of Super Rugby that I will touch on later) is actually irrelevant. If you finish third in a five-team competition you don't deserve a rails run into the semifinals.rowan wrote:This is a brilliant column in defense of the Super Rugby format and playoffs system, but expressing concern over the Kiwi sides' growing domination. Exactly what I've been saying all along https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/a ... d=12094965
I rest my case...Doorzetbornandbred wrote:Crusaders by 18
As Marshall and Co were saying though what was the gameplan from the Canes? Seemed very odd to keep giving the ball back to probably the best side at taking half a chance...rowan wrote:Good call!
Canes resume tournament chokers status then. 3 wins from 10 semis now, I believe.
Oh, well, remember 2016 !!
Shouldnt the comparator be Euro Champions Cup? I think so. And the average attendance in that for last season was a little over 15k.rowan wrote:More interesting graphics here:
In 2015, the average crowd size across the competition was 19,163, making it easily the world's biggest rugby competition by average attendance.
Last year, that overall average had dropped to just 14,436, a 24.67 per cent drop in attendance in just two years, and brings Super Rugby back to the chasing pack.
Super Rugby remains the rugby competition with the highest average attendance, based on 2017 figures. It averaged about 300 people a game more than the Aviva Premiership in England, and 900 more than the Top 14 in France.
But those big European leagues are holding steady with their attendance figures. In England, average attendance increased four per cent from 2015 to 2017, while the Top 14 declined by 5.59 per cent. The Pro14, which includes Italy, Ireland, and now a pair of South African teams, had an increase of one per cent.
Surprisingly, the team with the highest average attendance in world rugby is the Stormers, who had 28,700 through the gates on average last year.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/sup ... fe-support