Team for France
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for France
What are the ‘Hildas’?
I’m a big fan of Wilson. As Pie Man and Banquo have said he’s been a real asset since getting a run in the side.
As I said earlier in the thread, I don’t expect or want there to any non injury related changes to our side, but I’m curious to see what Brunel will do.
France are clearly hurting after Friday’s defeat and I think we should be on high alert. However, it’s difficult to know whether Brunel sticks with the same/similar side to round 1 or whether he brings back the likes of Bastareaud.
I’m a big fan of Wilson. As Pie Man and Banquo have said he’s been a real asset since getting a run in the side.
As I said earlier in the thread, I don’t expect or want there to any non injury related changes to our side, but I’m curious to see what Brunel will do.
France are clearly hurting after Friday’s defeat and I think we should be on high alert. However, it’s difficult to know whether Brunel sticks with the same/similar side to round 1 or whether he brings back the likes of Bastareaud.
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
Nickname for an ex England scrum half.Scrumhead wrote:What are the ‘Hildas’?
.

- Oakboy
- Posts: 6430
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
Hilda - our best ever 6.
-
- Posts: 19364
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
and 7. And nearly 8Oakboy wrote:Hilda - our best ever 6.

-
- Posts: 19364
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
Richard Hill's nickname was Hilda.Scrumhead wrote:What are the ‘Hildas’?
I’m a big fan of Wilson. As Pie Man and Banquo have said he’s been a real asset since getting a run in the side.
As I said earlier in the thread, I don’t expect or want there to any non injury related changes to our side, but I’m curious to see what Brunel will do.
France are clearly hurting after Friday’s defeat and I think we should be on high alert. However, it’s difficult to know whether Brunel sticks with the same/similar side to round 1 or whether he brings back the likes of Bastareaud.
- morepork
- Posts: 7534
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Team for France
He wouldn't bring Shields in.....would he?
- Puja
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team for France
Please don't. We're all in such a good mood right now.morepork wrote:He wouldn't bring Shields in.....would he?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
Guaranteed.morepork wrote:He wouldn't bring Shields in.....would he?
- morepork
- Posts: 7534
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Team for France
He is frickin stubborn. I reckon he'll do it.
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for France
No speculation on the French team?
If I were Brunel I’d definitely be reconsidering my side after Friday’s game. The ginger guy Lambey was much better than whoever he replaced (clearly they were anonymous) and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Ntamack dropped for Bastareaud.
If I were Brunel I’d definitely be reconsidering my side after Friday’s game. The ginger guy Lambey was much better than whoever he replaced (clearly they were anonymous) and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Ntamack dropped for Bastareaud.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Team for France
Oakboy wrote:Hilda - our best ever 6.
Not sure about that - Mike Teague ?
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Team for France
morepork wrote:He wouldn't bring Shields in.....would he?
Shields in the defend the Raeburn Shield ?
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6430
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
Teague was a tough nut but had a limited game compared to Hill.Rich wrote:Oakboy wrote:Hilda - our best ever 6.
Not sure about that - Mike Teague ?
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
I've heard it mention, numerous times, that Dallaglio is our best ever 6.Oakboy wrote:Teague was a tough nut but had a limited game compared to Hill.Rich wrote:Oakboy wrote:Hilda - our best ever 6.
Not sure about that - Mike Teague ?
I would have Hill every day of the week
-
- Posts: 19364
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
Dallaglio was a better 6 than an 8, but Hill was a superb 7.p/d wrote:I've heard it mention, numerous times, that Dallaglio is our best ever 6.Oakboy wrote:Teague was a tough nut but had a limited game compared to Hill.Rich wrote:
Not sure about that - Mike Teague ?
I would have Hill every day of the week
And 6.
(and who said Dayglo was our best ever 6?)
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6430
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
Hill was intelligent enough to be a back!



- Puja
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team for France
I believe the answer to your question is probably Dallaglio himself.Banquo wrote:Dallaglio was a better 6 than an 8, but Hill was a superb 7.p/d wrote:I've heard it mention, numerous times, that Dallaglio is our best ever 6.Oakboy wrote:
Teague was a tough nut but had a limited game compared to Hill.
I would have Hill every day of the week
And 6.
(and who said Dayglo was our best ever 6?)
Hill also did a good spot as no 8 at one point to allow Moody and Back on the flanks. He was truly superb.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
actually just been searching and it would appear I read a Lynagh XV ...................... so forget I said anything.Puja wrote:I believe the answer to your question is probably Dallaglio himself.Banquo wrote:Dallaglio was a better 6 than an 8, but Hill was a superb 7.p/d wrote:
I've heard it mention, numerous times, that Dallaglio is our best ever 6.
I would have Hill every day of the week
And 6.
(and who said Dayglo was our best ever 6?)
Puja
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Team for France
Nick Isiekwe called into the england squad.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Team for France
Interesting, positive too
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
-
- Posts: 2543
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Team for France
France will be without fat prop Atonio (no great loss in my opinion) and classy centre Wesley Fofana. I hope Brunel resists the temptation to bring in Bastareaud and keeps faith with Ntamack and calls on Racing’s Henri Chavancy. Ginger Lambert more than deserves his chance in the starting XV replacing fat Saffa Willemse!
-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for France
Fofana is a much bigger loss than Antonio. TBH, I would have preferred the latter to be playing as I really don’t rate him.
-
- Posts: 12256
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
Is Fofana still good?
He seemed to appear and be incredible a good few years back, then was in and out of the side for a long time and had lots of injuries I think.
He seemed to appear and be incredible a good few years back, then was in and out of the side for a long time and had lots of injuries I think.