You're not kidding. One might also surmise that it should've been done before even lighting the Article 50 fuse or having an election. But, then at that point, May and the Conservatives were still at "Crush the Saboteurs!" levels of confidence in their own rectitude, and so didn't need to talk to or compromise with anyone.Lizard wrote:I’m no expert, and I’m not even UKish, but all this canvassing of options for Brexit by Parliament, and a cross-party leadership summit, aimed at finding bipartisan support for a workable, broadly acceptable way to undergo this major, practically irreversible constitutional change, shouldn’t this have been done as soon as possible after the referendum, if not before?
Only getting on to it now seems a bit like an unseemly, last-minute Charlie Foxtrot.
The best kind of May compromise is where everyone just agrees that they were wrong to disagree with her. The second best is just agreeing that we'll discuss that part at some point later.Which Tyler wrote:Just got in; surely I've got this wrong. Please tell me I've got this wrong.
So... She's asking the EU for an extension, but not giving them any reason to.
She's inviting Corbyn to talk about compromise, but A] not actually telling him this, and B] compromise JUST include her existing working agreement, and all of her red lines, and no new negotiating.
WTF?
Puja