Super Rugby

Moderator: morepork

Post Reply
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

Man buns.....sorry, Canes 21-0 up V Lions after 20 mins...
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

Coles doesn't eff around hooking the ball. Good stuff.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

41-17 to the Man Buns.

Coles is just smooth with the ball in hand. Sets up a try like a center.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Len »

morepork wrote:41-17 to the Man Buns.

Coles is just smooth with the ball in hand. Sets up a try like a center.
Better skills than Jamie Roberts
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

They put 50 on them. Canes look to have some beasts in the forwards. The Bus got two, but still looks like Bill Cosby in a diabetic coma.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

Canes - best team never to win the title !!!!!
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

I believe the Stormers & Bulls are marginally ahead of the Lions, with the Bulls having a couple of games in hand. Right now the Pretorians look like the only side capable of breaking the Kiwi stranglehold . . .
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Lizard »

rowan wrote:I believe the Stormers & Bulls are marginally ahead of the Lions, with the Bulls having a couple of games in hand. Right now the Pretorians look like the only side capable of breaking the Kiwi stranglehold . . .
Stormers and Bulls are ahead of the Lions in the SA division, but they're both in the conference that is not playing any NZ teams (ie they avoid arguably the 4 top teams). It's no surprise they're ahead on points.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

Yeh, but I think the Bulls are on about a 6-game winning streak since losing in the opening round. Their last couple of victories against Aussie sides have been very comprehensive.

Speaking of which, the Jaguares annihilated the Kings 73-27 today 8-)
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Lizard »

rowan wrote:Yeh, but I think the Bulls are on about a 6-game winning streak since losing in the opening round. Their last couple of victories against Aussie sides have been very comprehensive.

Speaking of which, the Jaguares annihilated the Kings 73-27 today 8-)
That's comprehensive, even if the Kings are a joke.

The Bulls are 6 from 8, with 5 wins coming consecutively after an opening heavy loss to the Stormers, a win v the Rebels and a draw with the Sharks. You can only beat what's in front of you but 5 in a row isn't much to write home about when what's in front of you are Sunwolves, Cheetahs, Kings, Reds and the Force.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

Is an all-Kiwi semi-finals possible? On form, that's the way it's shaping up...
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Spy
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Spy »

Cracker of a South Island derby on at the moment. Highlanders leading the Crusaders 20-12, having scored 3 tidy tries. Cru were dominating the game, had 2 tries disallowed, but resolute Highlanders defence kept them in the game before equally shoddy Crusaders D let the Highlanders strike back.
User avatar
Spy
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Spy »

FT 34-26 Highlanders, a late Dagg try making it sound closer than it really was. The Crusaders totally dominated the first quarter, but a couple of Highlanders tries against the run of play turned it round. Highlanders were excellent in the end. Good rugby.
UGagain
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:39 am

Re: Super Rugby

Post by UGagain »

Spy wrote:FT 34-26 Highlanders, a late Dagg try making it sound closer than it really was. The Crusaders totally dominated the first quarter, but a couple of Highlanders tries against the run of play turned it round. Highlanders were excellent in the end. Good rugby.

Brilliant match. Hard to see the Kiwi teams being beaten on that performance.

C****s. ;)
As for the maths. There are mathematic 'theories' on both sides, they are not the same as mathematical facts. I asked for maths.

Mellsblue.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Len »

Romano robbed. Stupid ref ect ect.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Len »

cashead wrote:
Len wrote:Romano robbed. Stupid ref ect ect.
I'm sorry your stupid loser team of stupid loser idiot losing losers lost to a team that the Blues smashed to smithereens without breaking a sweat.
Rolfcoptr

The Blues are the New Zealand rugby equivilent of anal prolapse.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

Such jolly japes.
UGagain
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:39 am

Re: Super Rugby

Post by UGagain »

Do I need one of those Rolf copters?
As for the maths. There are mathematic 'theories' on both sides, they are not the same as mathematical facts. I asked for maths.

Mellsblue.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

Len has one UG. Few miles on the clock, but popular with the ladies.

Just watched the game. How good are the two Smiths? Benjamin just Zen and right decisions almost every time. The little Smith has such a mean flat pass and keeps his dick in his pants, focusing instead on getting on with continuity.

Crusaders have an issue at centre maybe. They are relying a lot on consistent paint by numbers players like Todd. Forwards are definitely carrying them. Len, your mate at 14 had a good go at being Owen Farrell for the first 15.
UGagain
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:39 am

Re: Super Rugby

Post by UGagain »

morepork wrote:Len has one UG. Few miles on the clock, but popular with the ladies.

Just watched the game. How good are the two Smiths? Benjamin just Zen and right decisions almost every time. The little Smith has such a mean flat pass and keeps his dick in his pants, focusing instead on getting on with continuity.

Crusaders have an issue at centre maybe. They are relying a lot on consistent paint by numbers players like Todd. Forwards are definitely carrying them. Len, your mate at 14 had a good go at being Owen Farrell for the first 15.
I thought Len had a Dyslexia.
As for the maths. There are mathematic 'theories' on both sides, they are not the same as mathematical facts. I asked for maths.

Mellsblue.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

Kiwis still a cut above the others...
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by Len »

rowan wrote:Kiwis still a cut above the others...
Apart from Blues poos.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

Yeh, bit shocked by the magnitude of that result. I thought they were coming right now, since axing JK as the coach. Possibly just an aberration? I guess that's why they call them the 'Blues!' :evil: Anyway, let's see what the rest of the competition brings. . .
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Super Rugby

Post by rowan »

Graham Henry is disappointed in this year's Super Rugby competition, including the Kiwis' dominance, and says expansion to Argentina and Japan has diluted the quality:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/ar ... Henry.html
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Super Rugby

Post by morepork »

Ted you dick. What do you want?

Imagine how bad the Bloos would look without the new boys in the comp.
Post Reply