Our Squad
Moderator: Sandydragon
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
Our Squad
LH: Smith, Wynn Jones, Carre
HK: Owens, Dee, Elias
TH : Francis, Lewis
SR: AWJ, Ball, Hill, Beard
BR : Shingler, Wainwright, Tipuric, Davies, Navidi, Moriaty
SH: Davies, Williams, Davies
OH: Biggar, Patchell
CE: Parkes, Davies, Watkin
B3: Adams, North, Amos, Williams, Halfpenny
HK: Owens, Dee, Elias
TH : Francis, Lewis
SR: AWJ, Ball, Hill, Beard
BR : Shingler, Wainwright, Tipuric, Davies, Navidi, Moriaty
SH: Davies, Williams, Davies
OH: Biggar, Patchell
CE: Parkes, Davies, Watkin
B3: Adams, North, Amos, Williams, Halfpenny
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
Re: Our Squad
From that, Id go:
Williams, Adams, Davies, Parkes, North, Patchell, Williams
Smith, Owens, Francis, AWJ, Beard, Navidi, Tipuric, Moriaty
B: Dee, Wynn Jones, Lewis, Ball, Wainwright, G Davies, Biggar, Amos
In it to win it.
Williams, Adams, Davies, Parkes, North, Patchell, Williams
Smith, Owens, Francis, AWJ, Beard, Navidi, Tipuric, Moriaty
B: Dee, Wynn Jones, Lewis, Ball, Wainwright, G Davies, Biggar, Amos
In it to win it.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Our Squad
The omission of Lee and Rob Evans are probably the main headlines, but neither can really claim to be on form at the moment.
Otherwise, no major shocks given availability.
Otherwise, no major shocks given availability.
-
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Our Squad
Not a fan of the 18-13 split
Especially as you've still only got 5 props
Especially as you've still only got 5 props
- Numbers
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: Our Squad
Wyn Jones is covering tighthead as well as loosehead.Renniks wrote:Not a fan of the 18-13 split
Especially as you've still only got 5 props
-
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Our Squad
I know - but in my view that should definitely mean a leaning towards a 17-14 splitNumbers wrote:Wyn Jones is covering tighthead as well as loosehead.Renniks wrote:Not a fan of the 18-13 split
Especially as you've still only got 5 props
(An 18-13 makes slightly more sense to me when there is 6 props)
You're looking really quite light in the 10/12 department
*Shrug*
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Our Squad
Watkin is our only specialist centre cover.Renniks wrote: You're looking really quite light in the 10/12 department
*Shrug*

I rate him highly but you could hardly argue he's proven at test level yet. I presume Scott is considered too raw from his lay-off otherwise he's the no-brainer pick in that slot.
I know we can always call replacements out but we're talking about the other side of the planet here. What if Foxy suddenly pulls up on the morning of the Aus game? Do they really think Watkin is ready for that? Maybe they do, and maybe they're right... I hope so.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Our Squad
Watkin's inclusion over Scott Williams is my biggest disagreement with this selection. Watkin is good, but he still has yet to really prove himself at test level. Scott has done that, and had a better game on Saturday.Sourdust wrote:Watkin is our only specialist centre cover.Renniks wrote: You're looking really quite light in the 10/12 department
*Shrug*![]()
I rate him highly but you could hardly argue he's proven at test level yet. I presume Scott is considered too raw from his lay-off otherwise he's the no-brainer pick in that slot.
I know we can always call replacements out but we're talking about the other side of the planet here. What if Foxy suddenly pulls up on the morning of the Aus game? Do they really think Watkin is ready for that? Maybe they do, and maybe they're right... I hope so.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: Our Squad
NORTH or Amos can both cover 13, you would have thought tho that Owen Lane's versatility may have seen him picked ahead of Amos as we already have three other players who can cover fullback.Sourdust wrote:Watkin is our only specialist centre cover.Renniks wrote: You're looking really quite light in the 10/12 department
*Shrug*![]()
I rate him highly but you could hardly argue he's proven at test level yet. I presume Scott is considered too raw from his lay-off otherwise he's the no-brainer pick in that slot.
I know we can always call replacements out but we're talking about the other side of the planet here. What if Foxy suddenly pulls up on the morning of the Aus game? Do they really think Watkin is ready for that? Maybe they do, and maybe they're right... I hope so.
-
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Our Squad
Rob Evans better than what's heading to Japan
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Our Squad
Completely agree. He’s a bit rusty but I’d rather have him in the squad than Carre who is one for the future.paddy no 11 wrote:Rob Evans better than what's heading to Japan