Agreed. But WR doctors (the HIA ones?) could do this quite easily.Sandydragon wrote:Completely agree. The only stipulation for me would be that it was a genuine injury.normanski wrote:Why are people getting so het-up over a back replacing an injured forward?
Each team is allowed 31 players in their squad but how that squad is made up is down to selection by each country. I guess the only stipulation is that there has to be at least six front row specialists.
We don’t know if North, Amos and Halfpenny are all carrying knocks possibly making them ineligible for the next match. With only two games maximum to go it would be daft to call up a back row forward who would twiddle his thumbs because we already have back row cover by five experienced players.
Somebody as vital as Navidi coming off after 30 minutes would surely point the way to genuine injury.