All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Moderator: morepork
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Moody
Taylor
Sinckler
Whitelock
Retallick
Savea
Curry
Read
Smith
Mo'unga
May
ALB
Goodhue
Bridge
Barrett
Bench
George
Mako
Laulalu
Itoje
Cane
Perenara
Tuilagi
Watson
Taylor
Sinckler
Whitelock
Retallick
Savea
Curry
Read
Smith
Mo'unga
May
ALB
Goodhue
Bridge
Barrett
Bench
George
Mako
Laulalu
Itoje
Cane
Perenara
Tuilagi
Watson
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Mako is the best handling prop around, and George is pretty damn good.Lizard wrote:I guess it depends on whether you’re picking a team to play England’s game plan or NZ’s. I would probably go for Moody and Coles for their handling game. Sinckler is good though.
Take Coles or Moody out of a black shirt and you'll see how they match up. It's always hard to compare as you guys have had a team situation that has evolved really nicely over 15 bloody years. There has always been continuity and there has always been change, and it's meshed together to create an environment it seems easy to flourish in.
I think our pack is as good as anyones. The front row are superb, Itoje is excellent, and the backrow is fantastic. The only certainty I'd pick from NZ in that pack is Retallick. The backrow would scrap it out, and Itoje would oust Whitelock for me.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
It’s going to be a bloody good scrap, isn’t it!Stom wrote:Mako is the best handling prop around, and George is pretty damn good.Lizard wrote:I guess it depends on whether you’re picking a team to play England’s game plan or NZ’s. I would probably go for Moody and Coles for their handling game. Sinckler is good though.
Take Coles or Moody out of a black shirt and you'll see how they match up. It's always hard to compare as you guys have had a team situation that has evolved really nicely over 15 bloody years. There has always been continuity and there has always been change, and it's meshed together to create an environment it seems easy to flourish in.
I think our pack is as good as anyones. The front row are superb, Itoje is excellent, and the backrow is fantastic. The only certainty I'd pick from NZ in that pack is Retallick. The backrow would scrap it out, and Itoje would oust Whitelock for me.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Yeah. But if we can’t deal with your ability to suddenly speed up play and spread it wide, we’ll be hammered. The difference in quality at 9, and at 10 if Farrell is there, is huge.Lizard wrote:It’s going to be a bloody good scrap, isn’t it!Stom wrote:Mako is the best handling prop around, and George is pretty damn good.Lizard wrote:I guess it depends on whether you’re picking a team to play England’s game plan or NZ’s. I would probably go for Moody and Coles for their handling game. Sinckler is good though.
Take Coles or Moody out of a black shirt and you'll see how they match up. It's always hard to compare as you guys have had a team situation that has evolved really nicely over 15 bloody years. There has always been continuity and there has always been change, and it's meshed together to create an environment it seems easy to flourish in.
I think our pack is as good as anyones. The front row are superb, Itoje is excellent, and the backrow is fantastic. The only certainty I'd pick from NZ in that pack is Retallick. The backrow would scrap it out, and Itoje would oust Whitelock for me.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Yeah, I really struggled to not pick a pack with England + Retallick
But the backs are much closer, with probably only May and Tuilagi making it
Interesting that our flankers are even an option in this conversation now, that would have been laughable 18 months ago (or even shorter)!
But the backs are much closer, with probably only May and Tuilagi making it
Interesting that our flankers are even an option in this conversation now, that would have been laughable 18 months ago (or even shorter)!
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Which is better, Curnderhill or Cavea?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Eddie looking a bit panicky with the spy gate accusations followed by a swipe at the media, feeling the pressure maybe?
Queue the trademark Hansen super dry come back.
Queue the trademark Hansen super dry come back.
- Puja
- Posts: 17747
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Instinctually, I want to say Cavea, but that's possibly back to pig ignorance on both sides again, this time with us both favouring the other's.Lizard wrote:Which is better, Curnderhill or Cavea?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12185
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Hard to tell because he’s such a petulant dickhead basically all the time.J Dory wrote:Eddie looking a bit panicky with the spy gate accusations followed by a swipe at the media, feeling the pressure maybe?
Queue the trademark Hansen super dry come back.
I believe that sometimes it’s a genuine act of making himself the lightning rod it most of the time I think he’s just being a twat.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Eddie or Slim Steve?Mikey Brown wrote:Hard to tell because he’s such a petulant dickhead basically all the time.J Dory wrote:Eddie looking a bit panicky with the spy gate accusations followed by a swipe at the media, feeling the pressure maybe?
Queue the trademark Hansen super dry come back.
I believe that sometimes it’s a genuine act of making himself the lightning rod it most of the time I think he’s just being a twat.
- Puja
- Posts: 17747
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
It feels like this week he's making a song and dance so that the players are mostly left alone. It's a good tactic IMO.Mikey Brown wrote:Hard to tell because he’s such a petulant dickhead basically all the time.J Dory wrote:Eddie looking a bit panicky with the spy gate accusations followed by a swipe at the media, feeling the pressure maybe?
Queue the trademark Hansen super dry come back.
I believe that sometimes it’s a genuine act of making himself the lightning rod it most of the time I think he’s just being a twat.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
For the love of god - any god; fuck it, ALL gods - can we please stop this insistance on amalgamating 2 names into 1.
I hate it with dog breeds; it has absolutely no place when talking about human!
We're not German, we're allowed to use the space bar when required!
I hate it with dog breeds; it has absolutely no place when talking about human!
We're not German, we're allowed to use the space bar when required!
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Which Tyler wrote:For the love of god - any god; fuck it, ALL gods - can we please stop this insistance on amalgamating 2 names into 1.
I hate it with dog breeds; it has absolutely no place when talking about human!
We're not German, we're allowed to use the space bar when required!
Just to clarify Edd and Dee are not separate people, his name actually is Eddie, hope this helps.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Now that genuinely made me chuckle out loud - well played sirDigby wrote:Which Tyler wrote:For the love of god - any god; fuck it, ALL gods - can we please stop this insistance on amalgamating 2 names into 1.
I hate it with dog breeds; it has absolutely no place when talking about human!
We're not German, we're allowed to use the space bar when required!
Just to clarify Edd and Dee are not separate people, his name actually is Eddie, hope this helps.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Suggestions that S.Barrett will start at blindside, Savea at openside, and Cane on the bench.
I'm unconvinced this isn't just a ploy to make sure Cane sets some sort of unbeatable record for 'most caps without playing all of the top tier nations'.
EDIT: And supposedly some other suggestions that Moli will start ahead of Ta'avao, which I would not be at all opposed to. Quite the opposite, really.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/a ... d=12279196The All Blacks are in line to spring a major surprise when naming their team to play England in their Rugby World Cup semifinal on Saturday.
NZME understands that Scott Barrett is set to be given the nod to start at blindside flanker, with Ardie Savea moving to openside flanker and Sam Cane dropping to the bench.
I'm unconvinced this isn't just a ploy to make sure Cane sets some sort of unbeatable record for 'most caps without playing all of the top tier nations'.
EDIT: And supposedly some other suggestions that Moli will start ahead of Ta'avao, which I would not be at all opposed to. Quite the opposite, really.
Last edited by zer0 on Wed Oct 23, 2019 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 12185
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
I feel like I’ve literally never seen Cane do anything. Like, anything at all. I mean he’s played a lot of games so he must have done something. What does he do? Unseen work I’m guessing.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
He's a blindside flanker who pretends to be an openside; mostly makes a lot of tackles in-close to the breakdown and shifts bodies. He's just a more brutal, head-on, version of that Welsh blindside from a few years ago who used a lot of chop tackles.
EDIT: Dan Lydiate is the Welsh flanker I was thinking of.
EDIT: Dan Lydiate is the Welsh flanker I was thinking of.
- Puja
- Posts: 17747
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Is he a good back row? I've only ever seen him at lock. Bear in mind that our experience of shoving a spare lock in at 6 (please god, don't let Eddie be thinking of following suit) inevitably ends up with us being hilariously outmatched at ruck time, so it feels like a very odd decision from our perspective.zer0 wrote:Suggestions that S.Barrett will start at blindside, Savea at openside, and Cane on the bench.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/a ... d=12279196The All Blacks are in line to spring a major surprise when naming their team to play England in their Rugby World Cup semifinal on Saturday.
NZME understands that Scott Barrett is set to be given the nod to start at blindside flanker, with Ardie Savea moving to openside flanker and Sam Cane dropping to the bench.
I'm unconvinced this isn't just a ploy to make sure Cane sets some sort of unbeatable record for 'most caps without playing all of the top tier nations'.
EDIT: And supposedly some other suggestions that Moli will start ahead of Ta'avao, which I would not be at all opposed to. Quite the opposite, really.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Barrett has played there plenty for the Crusaders, and 9 of his 34 test caps (26%) are on the flank. He also came on at blindside in two of our more important recent matches: against you guys at Twickenham in 2018, and against Ireland in the quarterfinal. Both of those changes came at, or around, halftime, so they're at least confident that he can produce against the big boys for long periods.
He's typically done a good job as he strengthens the lineout significantly (doubly so with the Savea/Cane/Read trio) without giving too much away at the breakdown. Though, if it does eventuate, this would obviously be his greatest test to date.
He's typically done a good job as he strengthens the lineout significantly (doubly so with the Savea/Cane/Read trio) without giving too much away at the breakdown. Though, if it does eventuate, this would obviously be his greatest test to date.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
I don’t like the idea of playing guys out of their best position in RWC play offs. It never ends well.
I hope that Hanster know what they’re doing. I guess they want the presence of S Barrett but without breaking up the Whitallick locking partnership. Unless they’ve been doing some huge shifts in training, this move on top of using Beau’unga could be a shift too far. Even having Breece on the wings instead of Nahoane is a bit recent, as is using Moolala as props in place of Frankuafe.
I hope that Hanster know what they’re doing. I guess they want the presence of S Barrett but without breaking up the Whitallick locking partnership. Unless they’ve been doing some huge shifts in training, this move on top of using Beau’unga could be a shift too far. Even having Breece on the wings instead of Nahoane is a bit recent, as is using Moolala as props in place of Frankuafe.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Puja
- Posts: 17747
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
{golfclaps} Excellent work.Lizard wrote:I don’t like the idea of playing guys out of their best position in RWC play offs. It never ends well.
I hope that Hanster know what they’re doing. I guess they want the presence of S Barrett but without breaking up the Whitallick locking partnership. Unless they’ve been doing some huge shifts in training, this move on top of using Beau’unga could be a shift too far. Even having Breece on the wings instead of Nahoane is a bit recent, as is using Moolala as props in place of Frankuafe.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
And on the English side of things...
Potentially dual playmakers and reinforced lineout's on both sides. Have a sneaky suspicion that there just may be a bit of kicking in this one.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rug ... -semifinalGeorge Ford has been tipped to make shock return to the England starting team for Saturday's World Cup semifinal against the All Blacks. UK newspaper, the Telegraph, has reported that Ford will come into the starting team at first-five, with Owen Farrell moving out to No 12 and Manu Tuilagi playing at centre.
England coach Eddie Jones is also expected to tinker with his forwards and call up George Kruis to play a lock, in place of Courtney Lawes. Kruis is expected to be more of a handful in the lineouts than Lawes, with Jones believing this will be a crucial part of Saturday's game in Yokohama.
Jonny May, the winger who scored two tries against the Wallabies last weekend, is expected to recover from his hamstring injury and will be available to play.
...
Ford's recall will be bad news for Henry Slade, who'll be making way in the starting team for him. Slade got the nod to play against Australia because Jones feared the physical presence in the midfield of Samu Kerevi. The expected All Blacks midfield of Anton Lienert-Brown and Jack Goodhue will provide England with challenges, but running directly up the middle of the field won't one that features as prominently as it did with the Wallabies.
Potentially dual playmakers and reinforced lineout's on both sides. Have a sneaky suspicion that there just may be a bit of kicking in this one.
-
- Posts: 12185
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
All sounds about right. Big question with May's fitness concern is Slade on bench covering midfield/fullback (and wing via Daly) or take a proper winger? There's only rookie Coka or semi-fit Nowell.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
Team named.
1. Joe Moody (44 caps)
2. Codie Taylor (49)
3. Nepo Laulala (24)
4. Brodie Retallick (79)
5. Samuel Whitelock (116)
6. Scott Barrett (34)
7. Ardie Savea (43)
8. Kieran Read (125) (C)
9. Aaron Smith (90)
10. Richie Mo’unga (15)
11. George Bridge (8)
12. Anton Lienert-Brown (41)
13. Jack Goodhue (12)
14. Sevu Reece (6)
15. Beauden Barrett (81)
16. Dane Coles (67)
17. Ofa Tu'ungafasi (34)
18. Angus Ta'avao (12)
19. Patrick Tuipulotu (28)
20. Sam Cane (66)
21. T J Perenara (63)
22. Sonny Bill Williams (56)
23. Jordie Barrett (15)
So the speculation was spot on about S.Barrett, not so much about Moli.
1. Joe Moody (44 caps)
2. Codie Taylor (49)
3. Nepo Laulala (24)
4. Brodie Retallick (79)
5. Samuel Whitelock (116)
6. Scott Barrett (34)
7. Ardie Savea (43)
8. Kieran Read (125) (C)
9. Aaron Smith (90)
10. Richie Mo’unga (15)
11. George Bridge (8)
12. Anton Lienert-Brown (41)
13. Jack Goodhue (12)
14. Sevu Reece (6)
15. Beauden Barrett (81)
16. Dane Coles (67)
17. Ofa Tu'ungafasi (34)
18. Angus Ta'avao (12)
19. Patrick Tuipulotu (28)
20. Sam Cane (66)
21. T J Perenara (63)
22. Sonny Bill Williams (56)
23. Jordie Barrett (15)
So the speculation was spot on about S.Barrett, not so much about Moli.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: All Blacks v England. Oh sh**.
I love Sbarrett, but not sure if he is really a starting test 6.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================