Spiffy wrote:Agree about Owens' terrible reffing performance - the All Blacks were allowed to pass the ball forwards the whole game. A shocker.


Moderator: morepork
Spiffy wrote:Agree about Owens' terrible reffing performance - the All Blacks were allowed to pass the ball forwards the whole game. A shocker.
Haha. Very good.Spiffy wrote:Agree about Owens' terrible reffing performance - the All Blacks were allowed to pass the ball forwards the whole game. A shocker.
Hehe.francoisfou wrote:The grapes have turned sour!
Good man. A year of building up to revenge....see you 7/11/20. It’ll be a cracker.Spy wrote:Smashed. Utterly outplayed. Well done England.
Tell me about it! I've already had the daughter's in-laws round whanging on about it! If I was a believer, I just might have to ask all you Kiwis to pray for me!Lizard wrote:Ah well. Nice to let someone else have a go for a change.
I really Hope England don’t win the whole thing though - it would be unbearable. I’d prefer Wales (unlikely) but even the Boks would be better than England.
Mind you, bit of a damp squib if the 100th All Blacks v Springboks test is a bloody bronze final.
Haha. Jesus Christ. You really have outdone yourself there.cashead wrote:And that should have been at least a penalty to Slade, if not a penalty try and a yellow. You know the one I'm talking about. Fuck that shit.
Is the tackle from Slade that put yet another Kiwi carrier into touch? If so that's a quality rantMikey Brown wrote:Haha. Jesus Christ. You really have outdone yourself there.cashead wrote:And that should have been at least a penalty to Slade, if not a penalty try and a yellow. You know the one I'm talking about. Fuck that shit.
Oh Please.cashead wrote:Owens let the English backline play offside all night to the point where they might as well have been running around behind the All Blacks goalposts with the reserves. It put the All Blacks attack under pressure, naturally, and forced them towards the touchline, where the English defence could easily just shove them into touch. And with Itoje playing the way he did, they had no worries about retaining ball there.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Why do you keep running into touch? I cannot understand it.
Farrell also played the ref with his blatant dive from Whitelock's retaliation. Why this wasn't penalised, I'd say is anyone's guess, but we all know that Farrell is protected.
And that should have been at least a penalty to Slade, if not a penalty try and a yellow. You know the one I'm talking about. Fuck that shit.
Us pushing the offside line, I will give you, but this is utterly bizarre. The first contact was by Slade's outstretched arm - how on earth could that possibly have been a penalty, let alone a yellow? And as for penalty try, do you not think the fact that he was already being tackled low by another Englishman might have had an influence on the discussion that a try would definitely have been scored without Slade's input?cashead wrote:And that should have been at least a penalty to Slade, if not a penalty try and a yellow. You know the one I'm talking about. Fuck that shit.
Tru Say, Tru Say.Puja wrote:Us pushing the offside line, I will give you, but this is utterly bizarre. The first contact was by Slade's outstretched arm - how on earth could that possibly have been a penalty, let alone a yellow? And as for penalty try, do you not think the fact that he was already being tackled low by another Englishman might have had an influence on the discussion that a try would definitely have been scored without Slade's input?cashead wrote:And that should have been at least a penalty to Slade, if not a penalty try and a yellow. You know the one I'm talking about. Fuck that shit.
I appreciate the urge to nitpick the ref after losing a game that hurt - gods knows I've had enough experience across the last 16 years - but you can't genuinely say Nige cost you that game, especially when he gave you two final last warnings for yellow cards and only gave a penalty for a deliberate open hand strike to the head. He was iffy all around, as Nige often is, and both sides could reasonably complain that he screwed them - the truth is that he balanced out and didn't change the result.
Puja
I don't think refs would have blown us off the pitch. Nige caught Rettalick coming in from the side - we weren't doing that.canta_brian wrote:Partly agree Puja.
Nige always lets the tackle area be a free for all. Some refs would have blown England off the park today. However, that didn’t effect the result. What did was NZ refusing to adjust and put more bodies into the rucks and fight fire with fire.
Just a penalty for open hand strike however is bull. Honestly that was some football worthy fake injury rot from Farrell. Oh, a hand lightly pushed me, I’ll fake an injury until the tele ref notices and looks in slowmo to see if it looks like a penalty.
England smashed us today. That is what counts.
Feck the minute by minute breakdown. This is the in-depth analysis I’m looking for.morepork wrote:That was an old fashioned good hard jobbing.
They certainly failed to do their jobs, but there's also plenty of alternative selections in the forwards. Some were overlooked for one reason or another (Owen Franks, Karl Tu'inukuafe, Dalton Papali'i). Others are uncapped big lumps of human ripe for physical confrontations (Akira Ioane, Andrew Makalio, Pari Pari Parkinson).paddy no 11 wrote:Ye missed franks ability to cheat successfully today and laumape to bring some physicality in hindsight beauden at 10 and smith at 15 was a better option, still forwards were smashed and not sure ye had any answers there in selection terms?
Aye, same.Puja wrote:Bad luck guys - it's a testament to how great a side that you are that I only stopped being terrified that you'd snatch it from us when there were 2 minutes to go. We had to work ridiculously hard for that and you pushed us all the way.
Puja
+2WaspInWales wrote:Aye, same.Puja wrote:Bad luck guys - it's a testament to how great a side that you are that I only stopped being terrified that you'd snatch it from us when there were 2 minutes to go. We had to work ridiculously hard for that and you pushed us all the way.
Puja
Even when the clock was in the red I thought we may still lose.
NZ were not at their clinical best, but England deserve a lot of credit for that imo.
It was the best I've seen us play for a number of years.
I would say more neutralised than butchered. Mind, I don't know who looks at this England team and decides that the way to attack them is through the maul.Cameo wrote:NZ also butchered their first three attempts at mauls. Having picked Barret for that power game, those mistakes helped stop them really going for it.