COVID19
-
- Posts: 5833
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: COVID19
Dont get this. Its OK to lambast the Govt for lack of PPE but not to question how we've got into this situation because its banging on about things that have happened.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: COVID19
This.fivepointer wrote:Dont get this. Its OK to lambast the Govt for lack of PPE but not to question how we've got into this situation because its banging on about things that have happened.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
We should be criticising the government for their reaction to this event, as we would any government at any time. And we should be directing most of our ire toward Boris for his catastrophic failure of leadership. 5 Cobra meetings missed is appalling, especially as he wasn't exactly doing anything else...
This should be the end of this government before it's even begun, but because of the mess on the opposition benches, they can't manage it yet.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14539
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
I’m not sure anyone has said you shouldn’t criticise the govt for lack of PPE. Though, there is also the point that some hospitals are hoarding.fivepointer wrote:Dont get this. Its OK to lambast the Govt for lack of PPE but not to question how we've got into this situation because its banging on about things that have happened.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
The issue is everyone is rushing to say we have our strategy completely wrong yet we’re only at approx 20%, hopefully, of the way through this until a vaccine is developed and distributed, and and single figure % through the economic fallout and the myriad of issues that arise from that. This isn’t as simple as how many COVID deaths do you suffer in the first two months.
It’s also the issue that just using COVID deaths as the metric for ‘success’ is too crude. Partly because of the above but also because COVID doesn’t treat all pops the same. Ethnicity and age demos are key, pop density, pop movement, living arrangements are key. Different cultures will also react differently, ie the U.K. pop under reacted against modelling when the govt asked them to use their common sense and went further than anticipated when given clearer direction. Yet, all we have, so far, is country A has X deaths compared to Y & Z country therefore they’re doing better or worse.
For context, I don’t think the govt have covered themselves in glory. They underplayed this at the start, possibly based on being too optimistic and possibly based on the fact they were playing off a flu pandemic hymn sheet, and have been scrambling ever since.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
No, but to expand I'm not fussed about someone black using white makeup. I am a little concerned about the Michael Jackson approach to not having a black face, and I am concerned about the whitening lotions one founds around the world, not so common here but very common in places like India.Puja wrote:Out of interest, are you black?Digby wrote:That would depend on context, if it's celebratory and for fun it doesn't bother memorepork wrote:Fair enough. Do it in black face then. That'll show them.
Puja
I have a massive problem with the idea someone owns their cultural heritage and others can't avail themselves of it. Whether that's in the arts, in technology, industry, sports... It's like some bastardised reverse hybrid version of the Tebbit Test. I was wondering what the closest I've come to cultural appropriation is, at least over a sustained a period, and on balance I think it would have come with wearing a Gi, mostly in karate but also some other martial arts, and for sure there are those who don't think that should be acceptable and that something like Karate should be limited to those from Japan, and then there are those who'd probably say ah, but Karate itself was like born from Kung Fu so the Japanese are only themselves cultural thieves
- Puja
- Posts: 17487
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: COVID19
Digby wrote:No, but to expand I'm not fussed about someone black using white makeup. I am a little concerned about the Michael Jackson approach to not having a black face, and I am concerned about the whitening lotions one founds around the world, not so common here but very common in places like India.Puja wrote:Out of interest, are you black?Digby wrote:
That would depend on context, if it's celebratory and for fun it doesn't bother me
Puja
You're drastically missing the cultural context. Things like blackface aren't bad because people are being greedy about their cultural heritage and want to stop people from using them, they're bad because historically they have been used to be racist, to promote racist stereotypes, or at the very, very best to make a joke out of pretending not to be a privileged white person. If there was no history of slavery, segregation, racism, systematic abuse and persecution in the world, then it would just be makeup. However, there is, so it isn't.
Also, giving permission for white makeup to be used is a massive false equivalence. There's no history of black on white systemic racism (in any of the countries any of us hail from) - we are not the butt of the joke. In fact, as you've noted, there's cultures where people bleach and lighten their skin because whiteness is valued higher (hooray Empire) and to be whiter is to gain societal and social benefits.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: COVID19
I’m very conscious of my hay fever right now...
- morepork
- Posts: 7517
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Stom wrote:I’m very conscious of my hay fever right now...
You got a thermometer at home boss? If so keep a daily watch on your actual fever if you are worried.
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: COVID19
More that when I'm out, I'm worried I'm going to sneeze and everyone look at me like I'm the second coming of lucifer!morepork wrote:Stom wrote:I’m very conscious of my hay fever right now...
You got a thermometer at home boss? If so keep a daily watch on your actual fever if you are worried.
And my face is oh so damn itchy! Glad I'm at home 99% of the time so I can itch to my heart's content, lol.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9041
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: COVID19
It will be interesting to see what the analysis suggests the non covid jump in deaths is down to. Is it undiagnosed/tested covid or is it a fair representation of how many lives are able to be saved by the NHS if they are not dealing with a pandemic.Which Tyler wrote:Covid 19.jpg
- morepork
- Posts: 7517
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
canta_brian wrote:It will be interesting to see what the analysis suggests the non covid jump in deaths is down to. Is it undiagnosed/tested covid or is it a fair representation of how many lives are able to be saved by the NHS if they are not dealing with a pandemic.Which Tyler wrote:Covid 19.jpg
The second one is what matters right now. If there is an increased probability of mortality over historical data and Coronavirus is the primary variable in this increase (lock down/restricted socialising meaning less cars on the road/ less brawls in pubs etc), then, I mean fuck, do you need a neon sign?
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: COVID19
Actually that's utter shite. There have been careful and nuanced points made and I'm not sure a single person on this thread has made that point, never mind "all we've had".Mellsblue wrote:I’m not sure anyone has said you shouldn’t criticise the govt for lack of PPE. Though, there is also the point that some hospitals are hoarding.fivepointer wrote:Dont get this. Its OK to lambast the Govt for lack of PPE but not to question how we've got into this situation because its banging on about things that have happened.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
The issue is everyone is rushing to say we have our strategy completely wrong yet we’re only at approx 20%, hopefully, of the way through this until a vaccine is developed and distributed, and and single figure % through the economic fallout and the myriad of issues that arise from that. This isn’t as simple as how many COVID deaths do you suffer in the first two months.
It’s also the issue that just using COVID deaths as the metric for ‘success’ is too crude. Partly because of the above but also because COVID doesn’t treat all pops the same. Ethnicity and age demos are key, pop density, pop movement, living arrangements are key. Different cultures will also react differently, ie the U.K. pop under reacted against modelling when the govt asked them to use their common sense and went further than anticipated when given clearer direction. Yet, all we have, so far, is country A has X deaths compared to Y & Z country therefore they’re doing better or worse.
For context, I don’t think the govt have covered themselves in glory. They underplayed this at the start, possibly based on being too optimistic and possibly based on the fact they were playing off a flu pandemic hymn sheet, and have been scrambling ever since.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14539
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
It’s all it’s boiled down to but whatever you want to think.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Actually that's utter shite. There have been careful and nuanced points made and I'm not sure a single person on this thread has made that point, never mind "all we've had".Mellsblue wrote:I’m not sure anyone has said you shouldn’t criticise the govt for lack of PPE. Though, there is also the point that some hospitals are hoarding.fivepointer wrote:Dont get this. Its OK to lambast the Govt for lack of PPE but not to question how we've got into this situation because its banging on about things that have happened.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
The issue is everyone is rushing to say we have our strategy completely wrong yet we’re only at approx 20%, hopefully, of the way through this until a vaccine is developed and distributed, and and single figure % through the economic fallout and the myriad of issues that arise from that. This isn’t as simple as how many COVID deaths do you suffer in the first two months.
It’s also the issue that just using COVID deaths as the metric for ‘success’ is too crude. Partly because of the above but also because COVID doesn’t treat all pops the same. Ethnicity and age demos are key, pop density, pop movement, living arrangements are key. Different cultures will also react differently, ie the U.K. pop under reacted against modelling when the govt asked them to use their common sense and went further than anticipated when given clearer direction. Yet, all we have, so far, is country A has X deaths compared to Y & Z country therefore they’re doing better or worse.
For context, I don’t think the govt have covered themselves in glory. They underplayed this at the start, possibly based on being too optimistic and possibly based on the fact they were playing off a flu pandemic hymn sheet, and have been scrambling ever since.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9041
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: COVID19
Yup, and most of them will be the second - they're still deaths caused by Covid, even though Covid wasn't the "cause of death".morepork wrote: The second one is what matters right now. If there is an increased probability of mortality over historical data and Coronavirus is the primary variable in this increase (lock down/restricted socialising meaning less cars on the road/ less brawls in pubs etc), then, I mean fuck, do you need a neon sign?
There are people not wanting to bother their GP about that mole, or a difficulty peeing, who would normally go get seen.
There are people too scared to go to a GP / hospital in case they contract Covid.
There are people dying before the ambulance gets there, or the ambulance gets there. But there's no ITU bed for them.
There are people who'd normally see ANOther therapist who might pick up a warning sign.
There's increased domestic abuse, and suicide.
Etc etc.
Of course, this will be balanced against fewer traffic accidents and alcohol related trauma / poisoning etc.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter. They're deaths that wouldn't have happened if Covid wasn't with us. IMO, it's the most important figure for analysing the impact of COVID.
FTR, for week 15, the 5-year average was around 10,520. The 2020 figure was 18,516. 6,213 had Covid on the death certificate (whether cause of death, or incidental).
With the mild winter, we'd been running below average before Covid struck.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
It will take a while before we can distinguish between countries such as the UK, France, Italy, Sweden, and the USA.Sandydragon wrote:Actually that's perfectly reasonable. Given that there will be multiple waves of this virus.Son of Mathonwy wrote:We can always count on the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg to hold the government to account:
As we have discussed here before, it will be a long time - perhaps years rather than months - before a reasoned consensus can be reached about which countries took the best approaches to this and which made the most egregious mistakes.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52358676
That's tough journalism for you.
It will take a while before we can distinguish between countries such as South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.
But we've already had enough time to distinguish between these two groups and to point out which made the most "egregious mistakes".
What do you mean by multiple "waves" of this virus?
If we get the cases and deaths well down, the only reason for them rising to this kind of level again is if we mishandle the epidemic.
Its not a foregone conclusion that there will be "waves" and saying so is handing our leaders an excuse in advance.
South Korea and Singapore will not be experiencing anything other than slight ripples in their death and case rates, and that's because they're doing the right things.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10462
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
Many experts are suggesting that this virus will disappear then reappear. Hence more than one wave. Part of that will be due to the virus hitting different countries at different times.Son of Mathonwy wrote:It will take a while before we can distinguish between countries such as the UK, France, Italy, Sweden, and the USA.Sandydragon wrote:Actually that's perfectly reasonable. Given that there will be multiple waves of this virus.Son of Mathonwy wrote:We can always count on the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg to hold the government to account:
As we have discussed here before, it will be a long time - perhaps years rather than months - before a reasoned consensus can be reached about which countries took the best approaches to this and which made the most egregious mistakes.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52358676
That's tough journalism for you.
It will take a while before we can distinguish between countries such as South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.
But we've already had enough time to distinguish between these two groups and to point out which made the most "egregious mistakes".
What do you mean by multiple "waves" of this virus?
If we get the cases and deaths well down, the only reason for them rising to this kind of level again is if we mishandle the epidemic.
Its not a foregone conclusion that there will be "waves" and saying so is handing our leaders an excuse in advance.
South Korea and Singapore will not be experiencing anything other than slight ripples in their death and case rates, and that's because they're doing the right things.
Yes South Korea took a different path and so far they are managing this well. But there have been different approaches in Europe and we will see which is the most successful.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10462
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
I’m suggesting that it’s all about the timing. How we got into this and wasted so much time is definitely for the inquest. But now it’s a distraction and the focus should on managing the situation we are in, not the situation we wish to be in.fivepointer wrote:Dont get this. Its OK to lambast the Govt for lack of PPE but not to question how we've got into this situation because its banging on about things that have happened.
It's precisely because things weren't done that we face a PPE shortage, surely. Why wasn't Deighton appointed to deal specifically with this issue weeks ago. Govt must have known there would be a high demand for PPE over an extended period. Why haven't there been a far greater effort to utilise UK based manufacturers, who seem to have been largely ignored?
The time has come to put a stop to this "working day and night and straining every sinew" line. We expect Govt to be pulling out all the stops. That should be a given. The Govt has to deliver.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10462
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
Hay fever is a bitch.Stom wrote:More that when I'm out, I'm worried I'm going to sneeze and everyone look at me like I'm the second coming of lucifer!morepork wrote:Stom wrote:I’m very conscious of my hay fever right now...
You got a thermometer at home boss? If so keep a daily watch on your actual fever if you are worried.
And my face is oh so damn itchy! Glad I'm at home 99% of the time so I can itch to my heart's content, lol.
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: COVID19
You’re coming across as nothing more than a Tory apologist now.Mellsblue wrote:It’s all it’s boiled down to but whatever you want to think.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Actually that's utter shite. There have been careful and nuanced points made and I'm not sure a single person on this thread has made that point, never mind "all we've had".Mellsblue wrote: I’m not sure anyone has said you shouldn’t criticise the govt for lack of PPE. Though, there is also the point that some hospitals are hoarding.
The issue is everyone is rushing to say we have our strategy completely wrong yet we’re only at approx 20%, hopefully, of the way through this until a vaccine is developed and distributed, and and single figure % through the economic fallout and the myriad of issues that arise from that. This isn’t as simple as how many COVID deaths do you suffer in the first two months.
It’s also the issue that just using COVID deaths as the metric for ‘success’ is too crude. Partly because of the above but also because COVID doesn’t treat all pops the same. Ethnicity and age demos are key, pop density, pop movement, living arrangements are key. Different cultures will also react differently, ie the U.K. pop under reacted against modelling when the govt asked them to use their common sense and went further than anticipated when given clearer direction. Yet, all we have, so far, is country A has X deaths compared to Y & Z country therefore they’re doing better or worse.
For context, I don’t think the govt have covered themselves in glory. They underplayed this at the start, possibly based on being too optimistic and possibly based on the fact they were playing off a flu pandemic hymn sheet, and have been scrambling ever since.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14539
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
Singapore might beg to differ:Son of Mathonwy wrote: South Korea and Singapore will not be experiencing anything other than slight ripples in their death and case rates, and that's because they're doing the right things.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14539
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
I wouldn’t expect you to think anything else.canta_brian wrote:You’re coming across as nothing more than a Tory apologist now.Mellsblue wrote:It’s all it’s boiled down to but whatever you want to think.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: Actually that's utter shite. There have been careful and nuanced points made and I'm not sure a single person on this thread has made that point, never mind "all we've had".
- morepork
- Posts: 7517
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Which Tyler wrote:Yup, and most of them will be the second - they're still deaths caused by Covid, even though Covid wasn't the "cause of death".morepork wrote: The second one is what matters right now. If there is an increased probability of mortality over historical data and Coronavirus is the primary variable in this increase (lock down/restricted socialising meaning less cars on the road/ less brawls in pubs etc), then, I mean fuck, do you need a neon sign?
There are people not wanting to bother their GP about that mole, or a difficulty peeing, who would normally go get seen.
There are people too scared to go to a GP / hospital in case they contract Covid.
There are people dying before the ambulance gets there, or the ambulance gets there. But there's no ITU bed for them.
There are people who'd normally see ANOther therapist who might pick up a warning sign.
There's increased domestic abuse, and suicide.
Etc etc.
Of course, this will be balanced against fewer traffic accidents and alcohol related trauma / poisoning etc.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter. They're deaths that wouldn't have happened if Covid wasn't with us. IMO, it's the most important figure for analysing the impact of COVID.
FTR, for week 15, the 5-year average was around 10,520. The 2020 figure was 18,516. 6,213 had Covid on the death certificate (whether cause of death, or incidental).
With the mild winter, we'd been running below average before Covid struck.
Mate, less people out and about and a significant increase in deaths is not that hard to process.
- Stom
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: COVID19
Don't get it in the UK. It's only from 2 plants, one is ragweed, that's not in the UK. The second I don't know yet, but is a lot milder. Started when I came here, but only very mildly because I lived in the city centre. Now I'm out in the leafy suburbs, it's much worse, but I'm lucky I only get itchiness and sneezing, some get it a lot, lot worse.Sandydragon wrote:Hay fever is a bitch.Stom wrote:More that when I'm out, I'm worried I'm going to sneeze and everyone look at me like I'm the second coming of lucifer!morepork wrote:
You got a thermometer at home boss? If so keep a daily watch on your actual fever if you are worried.
And my face is oh so damn itchy! Glad I'm at home 99% of the time so I can itch to my heart's content, lol.
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: COVID19
So the nightingale hospital in London. Opened to great fanfare and built with an initial capacity of 500 and the ability to expand to 4000, has so far treated 41 patients.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... y-patients
Now I know that I’m only posting these sorts of things because of my left wing bias, but anyone who doesn’t think that this government has treated the covid crisis to the same infowars methodology as they did with brexit is an idiot.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... y-patients
Now I know that I’m only posting these sorts of things because of my left wing bias, but anyone who doesn’t think that this government has treated the covid crisis to the same infowars methodology as they did with brexit is an idiot.