Hey, gin is medicinal, tonic is medicinal, lime is medicinal. I think we just drink G&T or Gimlets all day long.Banquo wrote:If only it was a G and T, Sauvignon Blanc and beer combo.Mellsblue wrote:Could nicotine be the answer?!?!?
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 9-11977460
COVID19
- Stom
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: COVID19
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: COVID19
Yuh - Frankee studies mirror findings floated here last week from US & China..Vape manufacturers will be cursing the worrying link to fatalities a few months back.Mellsblue wrote:Could nicotine be the answer?!?!?
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 9-11977460
(Of course, this is only a sky news article so may not count.)
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Also key is a plan enacted by government which includes early action, testing and contact tracing, social and workplace distancing measures, checks on new arrivals to the country.Donny osmond wrote:Interesting in the guardian today. A compliant populace who take responsibility for their actions is pretty much key to flattening the curve.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... irus-curve
A populace willing to follow government guidance is, of course, vital, but we have that in the UK. We've exceeded the government's expectations in how hard we've locked down. This is a nation with a queuing obsession, after all.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
The downside of an open border from an Irish perspective.canta_brian wrote:
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: COVID19
Not an envirogeek but would say it has to, as there have been a number of close calls before this one.Mellsblue wrote:For any built environment geeks amongst you:
https://www.buildingsandcities.org/insi ... eyond.html
Will COVID alter how we design, plan and build?.
Slum clearances due to overcrowding and insanitory conditions resulted in large sub-urban or peri-urban estates and New Towns - on the premise that ammenities and work could easily be reached from your green and open spaces by hopping on a bus or getting in your car..
Loss of local employment, commuting nightmares to new business centres, costly maintaining or installing new utility networks - all problematic for these sprawls - so Mega-cities crammed with vertical congested living spaces and mini appartments are here.In a way, we have re-invented insanitory environments..
Working from home has proven a seamless transition for
some, so it would depend on the weighting of human interaction by organisations and employees.It's a big cultural shift for some.
** Lowest weekday increase in deaths for 3 weeks reported (616), so the gentle crawl down the other side continues..
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: COVID19
It looks as if those 400,000 Turkish gowns have turned out to be 32,000. Only enough for a few hours supply.
https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/exclu ... 78.article
This in itself is not the fault of the government. However, the government may struggle to convince people of this seeing as they made such a song and dance about how clever they had been to procure the shipment in the first place.
https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/exclu ... 78.article
This in itself is not the fault of the government. However, the government may struggle to convince people of this seeing as they made such a song and dance about how clever they had been to procure the shipment in the first place.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: COVID19
I think Spain is the same. See also USA.Banquo wrote:thanks, that's why I raised the question on tracing. Spain similar I assume? I'm keen to understand the different implementation models, and also why mortality rate vary so wildly (even accounting for reporting discrepancies).Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Banquo, Italy has higher power capita testing NOW. They started much too late, rather like us, and there's no way of catching up once the virus has got beyond your ability to trace contacts.
Interestingly Hancock had naively said that we'll take the South Korean approach once we start relaxing lock down.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 20889
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: COVID19
taEugene Wrayburn wrote:I think Spain is the same. See also USA.Banquo wrote:thanks, that's why I raised the question on tracing. Spain similar I assume? I'm keen to understand the different implementation models, and also why mortality rate vary so wildly (even accounting for reporting discrepancies).Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Banquo, Italy has higher power capita testing NOW. They started much too late, rather like us, and there's no way of catching up once the virus has got beyond your ability to trace contacts.
Interestingly Hancock had naively said that we'll take the South Korean approach once we start relaxing lock down.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
This is what happens when media people feel under pressure to get a good news story out. They jump on something like this and then when there are problem (almost inevitably) it all looks a bit daft.canta_brian wrote:It looks as if those 400,000 Turkish gowns have turned out to be 32,000. Only enough for a few hours supply.
https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/exclu ... 78.article
This in itself is not the fault of the government. However, the government may struggle to convince people of this seeing as they made such a song and dance about how clever they had been to procure the shipment in the first place.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
It happens because the government can't stop itself from overpromising and spinning.Sandydragon wrote:This is what happens when media people feel under pressure to get a good news story out. They jump on something like this and then when there are problem (almost inevitably) it all looks a bit daft.canta_brian wrote:It looks as if those 400,000 Turkish gowns have turned out to be 32,000. Only enough for a few hours supply.
https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/exclu ... 78.article
This in itself is not the fault of the government. However, the government may struggle to convince people of this seeing as they made such a song and dance about how clever they had been to procure the shipment in the first place.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?Son of Mathonwy wrote:It happens because the government can't stop itself from overpromising and spinning.Sandydragon wrote:This is what happens when media people feel under pressure to get a good news story out. They jump on something like this and then when there are problem (almost inevitably) it all looks a bit daft.canta_brian wrote:It looks as if those 400,000 Turkish gowns have turned out to be 32,000. Only enough for a few hours supply.
https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/exclu ... 78.article
This in itself is not the fault of the government. However, the government may struggle to convince people of this seeing as they made such a song and dance about how clever they had been to procure the shipment in the first place.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisisSandydragon wrote:If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?Son of Mathonwy wrote:It happens because the government can't stop itself from overpromising and spinning.Sandydragon wrote:
This is what happens when media people feel under pressure to get a good news story out. They jump on something like this and then when there are problem (almost inevitably) it all looks a bit daft.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Agreed. Promising something that's beyond your control, and that in fact does not arrive, is pretty much the definition of overpromising.Digby wrote:It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisisSandydragon wrote:If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?Son of Mathonwy wrote: It happens because the government can't stop itself from overpromising and spinning.
If that's not overpromising, I'd like to know what is.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
Promising something within your control and not deliveringSon of Mathonwy wrote:Agreed. Promising something that's beyond your control, and that in fact does not arrive, is pretty much the definition of overpromising.Digby wrote:It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisisSandydragon wrote: If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?
If that's not overpromising, I'd like to know what is.
-
- Posts: 20889
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: COVID19
Digby wrote:Promising something within your control and not deliveringSon of Mathonwy wrote:Agreed. Promising something that's beyond your control, and that in fact does not arrive, is pretty much the definition of overpromising.Digby wrote: It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisis
If that's not overpromising, I'd like to know what is.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Yeah, that is another example of overpromising.Digby wrote:Promising something within your control and not deliveringSon of Mathonwy wrote:Agreed. Promising something that's beyond your control, and that in fact does not arrive, is pretty much the definition of overpromising.Digby wrote: It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisis
If that's not overpromising, I'd like to know what is.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
Or, does anyone have a good news story that we can use to show that we are in top of this crisis because the fucking media are pressing us daily?Digby wrote:It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisisSandydragon wrote:If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?Son of Mathonwy wrote: It happens because the government can't stop itself from overpromising and spinning.
Yep, we’ve just placed an order for 400000 PPEitems arriving Sundaynfrom Turkey.
Great we’ll mention that.
Anyone in their right mind knows that supply chains are fragile at the moment so it might be delayed but as soon as it’s mentioned in a press briefing it has to be delivered on time or else, even if not the governments fault.
The media helps to drive this and something that is pretty straight down the line is suddenly distorted into a spin operations with Laura From the BBC suddenly making comments on it. We have al lost our sense of proportion.
So no, I don’t think the government set out to spin this one. They perhaps should have qualified the statement a little but that would have been torn apart as well so frankly you can’t win.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Sandy, seriously is there anything you'd hold this government to account for? It is entirely the fault of government that they promised this consignment would arrive on Sunday. And then again on Monday. No one forced them to promise a particular amount on a particular day. They could easily have given an honest answer, which is we have an order for X, which we expect to arrive in the next few days.Sandydragon wrote:Or, does anyone have a good news story that we can use to show that we are in top of this crisis because the fucking media are pressing us daily?Digby wrote:It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisisSandydragon wrote: If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?
Yep, we’ve just placed an order for 400000 PPEitems arriving Sundaynfrom Turkey.
Great we’ll mention that.
Anyone in their right mind knows that supply chains are fragile at the moment so it might be delayed but as soon as it’s mentioned in a press briefing it has to be delivered on time or else, even if not the governments fault.
The media helps to drive this and something that is pretty straight down the line is suddenly distorted into a spin operations with Laura From the BBC suddenly making comments on it. We have al lost our sense of proportion.
So no, I don’t think the government set out to spin this one. They perhaps should have qualified the statement a little but that would have been torn apart as well so frankly you can’t win.
Yes, this is not in itself the worst thing the government has done, by a long way, but please don't blame this one on the media.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16084
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
This just isn’t true. They signed a contract with a supplier. The supplier was full of BS. The country needs good news at the moment. There are lots of things in each press conference that are designed to give subconscious messages to the nation. Read ‘Inside the Nudge Unit’ for more info. This is such a strange thing to attack the govt on.Son of Mathonwy wrote:It is entirely the fault of government that they promised this consignment would arrive on Sunday.Sandydragon wrote:Or, does anyone have a good news story that we can use to show that we are in top of this crisis because the fucking media are pressing us daily?Digby wrote:
It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisis
Yep, we’ve just placed an order for 400000 PPEitems arriving Sundaynfrom Turkey.
Great we’ll mention that.
Anyone in their right mind knows that supply chains are fragile at the moment so it might be delayed but as soon as it’s mentioned in a press briefing it has to be delivered on time or else, even if not the governments fault.
The media helps to drive this and something that is pretty straight down the line is suddenly distorted into a spin operations with Laura From the BBC suddenly making comments on it. We have al lost our sense of proportion.
So no, I don’t think the government set out to spin this one. They perhaps should have qualified the statement a little but that would have been torn apart as well so frankly you can’t win.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
No. It is precisely true. No one forced them to promise it. They could have given the answer anyone else would have when a delivery is due - we have an order and the expected date of delivery is X, or we expect it to arrive in the next few days.Mellsblue wrote:This just isn’t true. They signed a contract with a supplier. The supplier was full of BS. The country needs good news at the moment. There are lots of things in each press conference that are designed to give subconscious messages to the nation. Read ‘Inside the Nudge Unit’ for more info. This is such a strange thing to attack the govt on.Son of Mathonwy wrote:It is entirely the fault of government that they promised this consignment would arrive on Sunday.Sandydragon wrote: Or, does anyone have a good news story that we can use to show that we are in top of this crisis because the fucking media are pressing us daily?
Yep, we’ve just placed an order for 400000 PPEitems arriving Sundaynfrom Turkey.
Great we’ll mention that.
Anyone in their right mind knows that supply chains are fragile at the moment so it might be delayed but as soon as it’s mentioned in a press briefing it has to be delivered on time or else, even if not the governments fault.
The media helps to drive this and something that is pretty straight down the line is suddenly distorted into a spin operations with Laura From the BBC suddenly making comments on it. We have al lost our sense of proportion.
So no, I don’t think the government set out to spin this one. They perhaps should have qualified the statement a little but that would have been torn apart as well so frankly you can’t win.
The country may need good news, but it doesn't need false hope. How much good does it do, to reduce the people's confidence in their government's ability to achieve vital things, if they fail in such a visible way? It was totally unnecessary. I blame the media for many things, but not for this. You say the supplier was full of BS. Maybe, but this "nudge" has left people with the impression that the government is full of BS.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16084
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
‘Precisely true’....if you say so.Son of Mathonwy wrote:No. It is precisely true. No one forced them to promise it. They could have given the answer anyone else would have when a delivery is due - we have an order and the expected date of delivery is X, or we expect it to arrive in the next few days.Mellsblue wrote:This just isn’t true. They signed a contract with a supplier. The supplier was full of BS. The country needs good news at the moment. There are lots of things in each press conference that are designed to give subconscious messages to the nation. Read ‘Inside the Nudge Unit’ for more info. This is such a strange thing to attack the govt on.Son of Mathonwy wrote: It is entirely the fault of government that they promised this consignment would arrive on Sunday.
The country may need good news, but it doesn't need false hope. How much good does it do, to reduce the people's confidence in their government's ability to achieve vital things, if they fail in such a visible way? It was totally unnecessary. I blame the media for many things, but not for this. You say the supplier was full of BS. Maybe, but this "nudge" has left people with the impression that the government is full of BS.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
They do own there's insufficient domestic supply and/or domestic products are inferior to (in this case) Turkish ones such we don't want them, so if their justification is we can't source from abroad as we want fine, but then they've got to take the hit along with some previous Labour governments, that they've been caught not having done their jobs on the domestic frontSandydragon wrote:Or, does anyone have a good news story that we can use to show that we are in top of this crisis because the fucking media are pressing us daily?Digby wrote:It's part an illustration of how hard it is to order supplies and part they're wanting to look good and counting their chickens before they're hatched. We will need to look at our redundancy plans around sourcing materials, manufacture and storage/distribution of PPE as it's clearly shite, and I've got a feeling this is a known thing which has been outstanding for over a decade, though successive governments haven't spent time/money on the issue and they've all assumed they'd not need redundancy coverage for a global crisisSandydragon wrote: If it has ordered 400000 items and has a deadline for delivery, how is that spinning or over promising?
Yep, we’ve just placed an order for 400000 PPEitems arriving Sundaynfrom Turkey.
Great we’ll mention that.
Anyone in their right mind knows that supply chains are fragile at the moment so it might be delayed but as soon as it’s mentioned in a press briefing it has to be delivered on time or else, even if not the governments fault.
The media helps to drive this and something that is pretty straight down the line is suddenly distorted into a spin operations with Laura From the BBC suddenly making comments on it. We have al lost our sense of proportion.
So no, I don’t think the government set out to spin this one. They perhaps should have qualified the statement a little but that would have been torn apart as well so frankly you can’t win.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16084
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: COVID19
OK, I can't say it more clearly. We'll just have to disagree on that point.Mellsblue wrote:‘Precisely true’....if you say so.Son of Mathonwy wrote:No. It is precisely true. No one forced them to promise it. They could have given the answer anyone else would have when a delivery is due - we have an order and the expected date of delivery is X, or we expect it to arrive in the next few days.Mellsblue wrote: This just isn’t true. They signed a contract with a supplier. The supplier was full of BS. The country needs good news at the moment. There are lots of things in each press conference that are designed to give subconscious messages to the nation. Read ‘Inside the Nudge Unit’ for more info. This is such a strange thing to attack the govt on.
The country may need good news, but it doesn't need false hope. How much good does it do, to reduce the people's confidence in their government's ability to achieve vital things, if they fail in such a visible way? It was totally unnecessary. I blame the media for many things, but not for this. You say the supplier was full of BS. Maybe, but this "nudge" has left people with the impression that the government is full of BS.
So, related points: Do you think it was wise to promise something they couldn't deliver? Do you think this broken promise has reduced public confidence in the government? Do you think it's good for the public to have reduced confidence in their government at this time?