Cricket fred

Post Reply
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

This about as close to watching test match cricket as I can recall in a while. There have been a few SA sides willing to grind things out, but there are two teams here willing to work their way into a match
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Anderson still has it
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Will be disappointed not to get the follow on option.
Good to see the pair properly in tandem sgain .
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote:Will be disappointed not to get the follow on option.
Good to see the pair properly in tandem sgain .
They only need c30 now though, so unlikely I'd think; both these two are decent bats.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Banquo wrote:
Galfon wrote:Will be disappointed not to get the follow on option.
Good to see the pair properly in tandem sgain .
They only need c30 now though, so unlikely I'd think; both these two are decent bats.
I’d think around 230 is where they’ll get to.

Btw, what was the name of that other obese wi spinner?
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Jofra not having a great time. Not sure why he and woakes opened this am- though in fairness jofra had an over to finish
Big D
Posts: 5595
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Broad has 4No. 3 wicket spells this year. Pretty good going.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Galfon wrote:Will be disappointed not to get the follow on option.
Good to see the pair properly in tandem sgain .
They only need c30 now though, so unlikely I'd think; both these two are decent bats.
I’d think around 230 is where they’ll get to.

Btw, what was the name of that other obese wi spinner?
He wasn't WI, that's why I was confused. Bermudan: Dwayne Leverock
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Feels like a poor decision not to promote Stokes and Buttler to 3 and 4. It was right to open with Sibley and Burns as we weren't far enough ahead that we could gamble, but they've done a fine job, got the lead over 270, taken the shine off the ball, wearied the bowlers, and now we need to take a chance to accelerate and try and beat the weather to get a result. It's overcautious captaincy from Root - looking to erase any possibility of defeat rather than looking at ways to win.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:Feels like a poor decision not to promote Stokes and Buttler to 3 and 4. It was right to open with Sibley and Burns as we weren't far enough ahead that we could gamble, but they've done a fine job, got the lead over 270, taken the shine off the ball, wearied the bowlers, and now we need to take a chance to accelerate and try and beat the weather to get a result. It's overcautious captaincy from Root - looking to erase any possibility of defeat rather than looking at ways to win.

Puja
I disagree. Root is going at a run a ball and Burns is scoring well since Sibley left.

When one of these is out, we’ll have plenty of time for Stokes to go mad.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:
Puja wrote:Feels like a poor decision not to promote Stokes and Buttler to 3 and 4. It was right to open with Sibley and Burns as we weren't far enough ahead that we could gamble, but they've done a fine job, got the lead over 270, taken the shine off the ball, wearied the bowlers, and now we need to take a chance to accelerate and try and beat the weather to get a result. It's overcautious captaincy from Root - looking to erase any possibility of defeat rather than looking at ways to win.

Puja
I disagree. Root is going at a run a ball and Burns is scoring well since Sibley left.

When one of these is out, we’ll have plenty of time for Stokes to go mad.
If Monday's a washout, as every forecast seems to suggest, it's leaving us one day to bowl the Windies out. Granted, we'd fancy our chances on current form, but it only takes a rain shower or bad light or an obdurate partnership to thwart us. I'd've said come out after tea with instructions to go full T20 and give us an hour and a bit to bowl at them tonight.

May all be absolutely fine in the end, but it does feel like playing it safe to me.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
Puja wrote:Feels like a poor decision not to promote Stokes and Buttler to 3 and 4. It was right to open with Sibley and Burns as we weren't far enough ahead that we could gamble, but they've done a fine job, got the lead over 270, taken the shine off the ball, wearied the bowlers, and now we need to take a chance to accelerate and try and beat the weather to get a result. It's overcautious captaincy from Root - looking to erase any possibility of defeat rather than looking at ways to win.

Puja
I disagree. Root is going at a run a ball and Burns is scoring well since Sibley left.

When one of these is out, we’ll have plenty of time for Stokes to go mad.
If Monday's a washout, as every forecast seems to suggest, it's leaving us one day to bowl the Windies out. Granted, we'd fancy our chances on current form, but it only takes a rain shower or bad light or an obdurate partnership to thwart us. I'd've said come out after tea with instructions to go full T20 and give us an hour and a bit to bowl at them tonight.

May all be absolutely fine in the end, but it does feel like playing it safe to me.

Puja
If it doesn’t rain tomorrow... they’re scoring well, it’ll be over soon.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:
Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
I disagree. Root is going at a run a ball and Burns is scoring well since Sibley left.

When one of these is out, we’ll have plenty of time for Stokes to go mad.
If Monday's a washout, as every forecast seems to suggest, it's leaving us one day to bowl the Windies out. Granted, we'd fancy our chances on current form, but it only takes a rain shower or bad light or an obdurate partnership to thwart us. I'd've said come out after tea with instructions to go full T20 and give us an hour and a bit to bowl at them tonight.

May all be absolutely fine in the end, but it does feel like playing it safe to me.

Puja
If it doesn’t rain tomorrow... they’re scoring well, it’ll be over soon.
I think it's foolish to be relying on Manchester weather, especially when the forecast is rain rain rain.

Do we really think the Windies can get 357 in a 4th innings anyway? And if they do, it'll be because our attack fell apart, not because we didn't have enough runs on the board. We should be bowling at them now and, if we'd put in Stokes at 3, we could have been in this position and bowling at them 20 minutes ago.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
Puja wrote:
If Monday's a washout, as every forecast seems to suggest, it's leaving us one day to bowl the Windies out. Granted, we'd fancy our chances on current form, but it only takes a rain shower or bad light or an obdurate partnership to thwart us. I'd've said come out after tea with instructions to go full T20 and give us an hour and a bit to bowl at them tonight.

May all be absolutely fine in the end, but it does feel like playing it safe to me.

Puja
If it doesn’t rain tomorrow... they’re scoring well, it’ll be over soon.
I think it's foolish to be relying on Manchester weather, especially when the forecast is rain rain rain.

Do we really think the Windies can get 357 in a 4th innings anyway? And if they do, it'll be because our attack fell apart, not because we didn't have enough runs on the board. We should be bowling at them now and, if we'd put in Stokes at 3, we could have been in this position and bowling at them 20 minutes ago.

Puja
Root scored plenty quick enough.

And that’s what I mean on the weather: you can’t trust it. If there’s 2 sessions tomorrow, that’s 5 sessions, plenty to bat through. England needed a good target.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Fair play to Burns, sacrificed an easy ton. Think the target and time are about right- guess they all remember Windies chasing 322 a couple of years ago.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:
Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
If it doesn’t rain tomorrow... they’re scoring well, it’ll be over soon.
I think it's foolish to be relying on Manchester weather, especially when the forecast is rain rain rain.

Do we really think the Windies can get 357 in a 4th innings anyway? And if they do, it'll be because our attack fell apart, not because we didn't have enough runs on the board. We should be bowling at them now and, if we'd put in Stokes at 3, we could have been in this position and bowling at them 20 minutes ago.

Puja
Root scored plenty quick enough.

And that’s what I mean on the weather: you can’t trust it. If there’s 2 sessions tomorrow, that’s 5 sessions, plenty to bat through. England needed a good target.
Yeah, fair play to Root - he turned in a very useful innings indeed and you can't complain too much - Stokes could have been put in and then out first ball for all we know.

I still think we've been overcautious - every weather forecast says no play tomorrow and, while they've been wrong before, I wouldn't bank on 5 sessions. 330 seemed like a good enough target given this Windies batting lineup and this England bowling lineup. However, it may be a moot point on both our parts as they're already 1 down and wobbling!

Correction, 2 down.

Puja
Backist Monk
fivepointer
Posts: 5896
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Turned out very well for England. The late wickets completely vindicated the timing of the declaration. Broad has had a sensational match and there has been runs for 5 of the top 6.
Today looks very wet but even if they dont get on, its hard to see Windies holding out on day 5.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Turned out very well for England. The late wickets completely vindicated the timing of the declaration. Broad has had a sensational match and there has been runs for 5 of the top 6.
Today looks very wet but even if they dont get on, its hard to see Windies holding out on day 5.
Had to also factor in bowler rest to the declaration, so think it was spot on.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

I tend to be of the view just declare and get after them. But I can't really argue with declaring with a lead of 400 and over 2 days left in the match, if the rain does us from here on out so be it
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Windies looking comfy.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Successful jinx, 500 for Broad who imo has somewhat prematurely been written off :)
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Eng back on track - Woakes is well tailored for home conditions..it's changeable+ up in Manc. today.
Broad was heading for a write-off due to inconsistencies, but form is temporary of course; as long as you put the hard work in! He'll be chasing Jimmy's top spot now.
and a new gong of course :)
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote:Eng back on track - Woakes is well tailored for home conditions..it's changeable+ up in Manc. today.
Broad was heading for a write-off due to inconsistencies, but form is temporary of course; as long as you put the hard work in! He'll be chasing Jimmy's top spot now.
and a new gong of course :)
It was a technical issue with Broad, which he sorted.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Bess is a good un, hope we keep the faith there. Shocking running though.

Rain not overly helping again- looks like on and off all day.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Woakes giving selectors a good problem to have.
Post Reply