Jack Clifford retires.

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
twitchy
Posts: 3297
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Jack Clifford retires.

Post by twitchy »

Very sad news. Poor guy.

https://www.quins.co.uk/news/100-cap-qu ... gh-injury/


Battling through two major shoulder surgeries following a dislocation while playing for Harlequins in his 100th game for the Club, the 27-year-old brings to an end a career that saw the impressive young flanker lead the England U20 side to a Junior Rugby Championship title in 2013, going on to earn ten senior England caps and playing in two of the national side’s three-match series white wash in Australia in 2016, all in addition to a fourteen-year relationship with the Club, having first linked up with Harlequins at 13.

On confirming his retirement, Clifford said: “I am absolutely gutted to be have to call time on my career at a relatively early stage. I have been at Quins since I was 13 years old and made so many good friends here. It has been an absolute pleasure training and playing with the lads each week and I will miss this environment greatly. I feel proud to have reached 100 appearances for Quins and it is ironic that the injury was sustained in my 100th game!”
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14580
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Mellsblue »

This comes as no surprise but I am gutted for him.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17842
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Puja »

As you say, it's been coming, but it is such a shame.

Puja
Backist Monk
fivepointer
Posts: 5932
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by fivepointer »

Thats really disappointing news.
Always very sad when a player has to retire early, and particularly so when that player showed such potential.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Digby »

It's a shame he never got the shot at the career he wanted, it also seems something of a relief he's not going out to get broken again
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Mikey Brown »

Ah bollocks.

What a shame, but sadly it seemed like only a matter of time. I guess if he wasn't able to get himself right in this off-period it's possible he never would have.
Scrumhead
Posts: 6004
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Scrumhead »

A huge shame. He had the skills and attitude to be a top player but his body wasn’t up to it.
FKAS
Posts: 8553
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by FKAS »

Really sad to see him retire at just 27. Had more to give, particularly internationally. Shame.
Scrumhead
Posts: 6004
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Scrumhead »

I’m not sure he did have that much more to give internationally.

If he’d not got injured a few years back, I think he certainly would have played more in the period where were really lacking in back row talent. Maybe that’s what you meant?

It’s very different now though and we’re genuinely spoilt for choice. Even if he’d been a regular in the squad, I don’t think he would have been able to keep the likes of Curry and Underhill at bay.

Losing Clifford, Kunatani and Robshaw (soon), leaves us very light in the back row.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14580
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Mellsblue »

Who knows what he could’ve become had he had 3 or 4 seasons without a serious injury. All academic now really.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Digby »

Mellsblue wrote:All academic now really.
Does one grade on the potential or the delivery? Or just through it into a Cummings approved algorithm for any old piece of nonsense?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17842
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:All academic now really.
Does one grade on the potential or the delivery? Or just through it into a Cummings approved algorithm for any old piece of nonsense?
As it turns out, the algorithm says that Jack Clifford played for Moseley 3rd XV and no higher.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1596
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by jngf »

Very sad to here this. Clifford pre-injury was just the sort of pacy forward that could have added some much needed attacking flair to complement the more defence focussed qualities of the current England flankers. Ben Earl and Lewis Ludlum are the nearest thing we’ve got to this in current England group of backrow forwards imo.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Mikey Brown »

Clifford pace yes, injured bad.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by 16th man »

As wages start to be cut down, I think we'll see more players taking this choice sooner, as the cost benefit starts to tip into "not worth the damage" territory.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14580
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Mellsblue »

Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:All academic now really.
Does one grade on the potential or the delivery? Or just through it into a Cummings approved algorithm for any old piece of nonsense?
As it turns out, the algorithm says that Jack Clifford played for Moseley 3rd XV and no higher.

Puja
We let the coaches decide, obvs. Half of the players in the Prem are now world class.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Digby »

Mellsblue wrote:
Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:
Does one grade on the potential or the delivery? Or just through it into a Cummings approved algorithm for any old piece of nonsense?
As it turns out, the algorithm says that Jack Clifford played for Moseley 3rd XV and no higher.

Puja
We let the coaches decide, obvs. Half of the players in the Prem are now world class.
Who wanted everyone to be above the average?
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Banquo »

jngf wrote:Very sad to here this. Clifford pre-injury was just the sort of pacy forward that could have added some much needed attacking flair to complement the more defence focussed qualities of the current England flankers. Ben Earl and Lewis Ludlum are the nearest thing we’ve got to this in current England group of backrow forwards imo.
Yeah Tom Curry and Billy are all about the D.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
jngf wrote:Very sad to here this. Clifford pre-injury was just the sort of pacy forward that could have added some much needed attacking flair to complement the more defence focussed qualities of the current England flankers. Ben Earl and Lewis Ludlum are the nearest thing we’ve got to this in current England group of backrow forwards imo.
Yeah Tom Curry and Billy are all about the D.
Billy does do a good Meghan Trainor
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Mikey Brown »

The article with Charlie Morgan is good.

Beyond that horrendous music, I found it interesting in that highlights video just how small he looked in the age grade clips. I don't know how much was gym and how much was genetics but he had a pretty enormous upper body by the end of his career. Never been quite clear on whether building that kind of muscle if supposed to help or hinder regarding injuries.
Scrumhead
Posts: 6004
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Scrumhead »

To be fair, you could probably say that about a lot of the age-grade forwards.

In Clifford’s case, I think he bulked up a bit more when he started to lose a bit of gas and was adapting to play a tighter game.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5846
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Jack Clifford retires.

Post by Stom »

Scrumhead wrote:To be fair, you could probably say that about a lot of the age-grade forwards.

In Clifford’s case, I think he bulked up a bit more when he started to lose a bit of gas and was adapting to play a tighter game.
Also, he never looked bulky. He seems quite well proportioned
Post Reply