I for one am simply jesting. He’s a quality young prospect, we have very few 12s... 2+2=5.Epaminondas Pules wrote:What has anyone seen from Barbeary (other than school vides) that makes anyone possibly think he could be a centre?
I doubt many have seen his set piece, but there weren't any real issues there, that said age grade scrums and lineout are not really as competitive as Prem rugby and beyond. The only issue really was at scrum time where his hook could be a little hit and miss, but compensated with power to drive over.
Oh and Banquo - you called it mate!
Alfie Barbeary
Moderator: Puja
- Stom
- Posts: 5866
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
- jngf
- Posts: 1625
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Yes, given England are so reliant on a fit Billy and that Barbeary has a similar stocky physical prescence and tight carrying qualities too, you’ld think he’d be worth a look at as a test 8? Certainly seems to conform to England norm (Starting from time of Morgan tbh) of having a Front rowish build used at 8twitchy wrote:He just looked incredibly comfortable at 8 and can seemingly do all different sorts of different ball carries well. Even his control of the ball at the base of the scrum looked very natural (I've seen international 8's struggle to do this).
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
I assume it's another weird piece of trolling, but Billy really doesn't play like a front row player, Curry and Simmonds really, really don't look like front row players, and we cannot possibly know if Barbeary can carry in remotely similar fashion to Billy.
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 11:04 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
If anything, I'd say Barbeary is more similar to Underhill. He's a dynamic ball carrier who breaks the line and causes chaos with the offload. Billy's more about tight carries that work more over time to wear down the opposition and cause chaos on a more general scale later in the game. Barbeary relies more on a bit of space. Which might be a problem with the current gameplay.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Can't really decide where to play him until we've seen how he goes at hooker. Can he scrummage, can he throw in, can he carry on creating this level of havoc and perform his set piece roles?
If he can, surely we're better off with him in the front row, frequently acting like a back row, than actually in the back row?
If he can, surely we're better off with him in the front row, frequently acting like a back row, than actually in the back row?
-
- Posts: 8615
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
He might be of similar build to Underhill but he seems to try and get on the ball a lot unlike Underhill who rarely carries. Might be youthful exuberance but soon he'll have played enough games to have settled into senior rugby proper. If he keeps the carrying work rate up and keeps putting in barnstorming performances he'll be difficult to overlook. If he starts doing it from hooker he'll be impossible to overlook.Dan. Dan. Dan. wrote:If anything, I'd say Barbeary is more similar to Underhill. He's a dynamic ball carrier who breaks the line and causes chaos with the offload. Billy's more about tight carries that work more over time to wear down the opposition and cause chaos on a more general scale later in the game. Barbeary relies more on a bit of space. Which might be a problem with the current gameplay.
- Puja
- Posts: 17929
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
This is the key issue for me. It's all very well saying, "If we put him at hooker, then we get all this loose performance without using a back row spot," but this could be like the "Croft could play lock!" argument in that moving him to a more strenuous scrummaging position loses a chunk of his impact in the loose. Plus, we don't want a neo-LCD where he specialises at hooker and then we're afraid to pick him cause his darts are wobbly.Tom Moore wrote:Can't really decide where to play him until we've seen how he goes at hooker. Can he scrummage, can he throw in, can he carry on creating this level of havoc and perform his set piece roles?
If he can, surely we're better off with him in the front row, frequently acting like a back row, than actually in the back row?
I hope he can convert to the front row and still keep this impact, but we'll have to wait and see.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Except he is a hooker, playing in the backrow for now to get him on the pitch because he's potentially that good. And LCD has had the best darts percentage in the Prem for three years running.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Yeah, the only way you're going to easily liken him to another is saying he's like a combination of others, since there's potentially no one like him, combination of George and LCD, got the soft skills (maybe better) of George, with the physicality of LCD. He's special, I'm hopeful that his set piece work will be upto snuff.
- Stom
- Posts: 5866
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Someone can have good numbers but regularly choke on the really important moments... while another can have poor numbers but regularly choke and be called THE ICEMAN.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Except he is a hooker, playing in the backrow for now to get him on the pitch because he's potentially that good. And LCD has had the best darts percentage in the Prem for three years running.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
Oh, whoops, wrong thread

-
- Posts: 12345
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Don’t worry. Every thread is a Farrell thread.Stom wrote:Someone can have good numbers but regularly choke on the really important moments... while another can have poor numbers but regularly choke and be called THE ICEMAN.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Except he is a hooker, playing in the backrow for now to get him on the pitch because he's potentially that good. And LCD has had the best darts percentage in the Prem for three years running.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
Oh, whoops, wrong thread
Remember that time he scored a disallowed try and then injured himself celebrating. Ah, memories.
- Puja
- Posts: 17929
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Disagree - he's an age grade hooker who has never played it at men's level, and the form that people are effusing about has come solely at back row. We *don't know* if his form will translate to him moving back to hooker, cause he's never played a minute of men's rugby there.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Except he is a hooker, playing in the backrow for now to get him on the pitch because he's potentially that good. And LCD has had the best darts percentage in the Prem for three years running.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 11:04 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
It's not quite the same as saying Maro to 8 or Underhill to 12! He does have some history there...
- jngf
- Posts: 1625
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Ben Clarke rarely played openside at all prior to British Lions 93’ tour yet he managed to adapt to being an England starter there (albeit not in Backy’s class) so just because Itoje’s not played at 8 before or Barbeary’s not played at 12 In senior rugby before doesn’t mean they couldn’t adapt to a switch of roles well if their build and athleticism can cope with it . That said the idea of Underhill at 12 has now put me off dinner so thanks for that!Dan. Dan. Dan. wrote:It's not quite the same as saying Maro to 8 or Underhill to 12! He does have some history there...
- Puja
- Posts: 17929
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Ben Clarke at 7. That's the argument you're going with? Ben Clarke. At 7.jngf wrote:Ben Clarke rarely played openside at all prior to British Lions 93’ tour yet he managed to adapt to being an England starter there (albeit not in Backy’s class) so just because Itoje’s not played at 8 before or Barbeary’s not played at 12 In senior rugby before doesn’t mean they couldn’t adapt to a switch of roles well if their build and athleticism can cope with it . That said the idea of Underhill at 12 has now put me off dinner so thanks for that!Dan. Dan. Dan. wrote:It's not quite the same as saying Maro to 8 or Underhill to 12! He does have some history there...
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Keeping up with the current game.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Eh? We musta been watching different Underhills.Dan. Dan. Dan. wrote:If anything, I'd say Barbeary is more similar to Underhill. He's a dynamic ball carrier who breaks the line and causes chaos with the offload. Billy's more about tight carries that work more over time to wear down the opposition and cause chaos on a more general scale later in the game. Barbeary relies more on a bit of space. Which might be a problem with the current gameplay.
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 11:04 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Meant Simmonds... 

-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Yes he has. He played hooker for Notts before getting injured and also for Wasps in the Prem Cup and several times in the A league.Puja wrote:Disagree - he's an age grade hooker who has never played it at men's level, and the form that people are effusing about has come solely at back row. We *don't know* if his form will translate to him moving back to hooker, cause he's never played a minute of men's rugby there.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Except he is a hooker, playing in the backrow for now to get him on the pitch because he's potentially that good. And LCD has had the best darts percentage in the Prem for three years running.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
Puja
- Puja
- Posts: 17929
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
And did he show this level of form there? Genuine question.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Yes he has. He played hooker for Notts before getting injured and also for Wasps in the Prem Cup and several times in the A league.Puja wrote:Disagree - he's an age grade hooker who has never played it at men's level, and the form that people are effusing about has come solely at back row. We *don't know* if his form will translate to him moving back to hooker, cause he's never played a minute of men's rugby there.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Except he is a hooker, playing in the backrow for now to get him on the pitch because he's potentially that good. And LCD has had the best darts percentage in the Prem for three years running.
I'm also not sure why we have to liken him to another player. He's his own player.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Pretty much from what I saw. To be fair the level of competition, at set piece certainly, is not quite what it is at the top level. The only issue I've seen in him is sometimes his hook could be a bit hit and miss. Was something that came out occasionally at schools/grade, where compensating through power made up for it somewhat.Puja wrote:And did he show this level of form there? Genuine question.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Yes he has. He played hooker for Notts before getting injured and also for Wasps in the Prem Cup and several times in the A league.Puja wrote:
Disagree - he's an age grade hooker who has never played it at men's level, and the form that people are effusing about has come solely at back row. We *don't know* if his form will translate to him moving back to hooker, cause he's never played a minute of men's rugby there.
Puja
Puja
Wasps do have somewhat of a quandary though with Oghre and Barbeary coming through alongside Taylor and Cruse. 4 into 2 is a tough call.
That said, I'm just pleased he's playing and making an impact. It all builds experience and exposure.
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Surgery on Monday, maybe out for 12 weeks
-
- Posts: 12345
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
FFS- which is it? 2? 6? 8? 12?
- Puja
- Posts: 17929
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Alfie Barbeary
Very good. Very good indeed.Mikey Brown wrote:FFS- which is it? 2? 6? 8? 12?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 6030
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Alfie Barbeary
TBH, 12wks is quite a good outcome. When I first saw him shout in pain and hobble off, I thought it was a knee ligament which could have been a lot longer lay off.